Posted on May 28, 2016
A1C Cyber Systems Operations
49K
844
660
24
20
4
39da27fb
I am an atheist, but I also believe strongly in the right to practice your own religion freely. When it comes to ceremonies, I believe that prayer could be seen as a violation of the establishment clause of the first amendment. I believe this because there are many different beliefs recognized by the government (atheism/agnosticism, satanism, Buddhism/Hinduism, etc...) that fall outside of the Christian spectrum, and having a Chaplin lead prayer before mandatory events forces non-believers and followers of different faiths to participate in a practice outside of their own. Is it just me, or should prayer during non-religious ceremonies be banned when it comes to mandatory events such as promotion/graduation ceremonies and commander calls to ensure religious freedom is enforced?
Posted in these groups: Atheism symbol AtheismAfp getty 511269685 CeremonyWorld religions 2 Religion
Avatar feed
Responses: 102
PO1 David M Burns
2
2
0
Get your sorry ass on the receiving end of an ak 47 and tell me what you think,
(2)
Comment
(0)
Capt Gregory Prickett
Capt Gregory Prickett
8 y
PO1 David M Burns

I've been shot at.

Still don't believe in your imaginary guy in the sky.

Any other questions?
(3)
Reply
(0)
SSG CID Special Agent
SSG (Join to see)
8 y
MSgt Burns, shame on you. No atheist I know, including me, would ever resort to violence when religious beliefs are involved. You know who you remind me of? ISIS. You are no better than ISIS with that comment.
(2)
Reply
(0)
PO1 David M Burns
PO1 David M Burns
8 y
Hang around sonny,unless you are a remf you make run into a real realigiouscl clown known as Isis,
(0)
Reply
(0)
PO1 David M Burns
PO1 David M Burns
8 y
Steven obviously you are a REMf Americans don't use ak 47!, the bad guys use it
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
1px xxx
Suspended Profile
As it is presently (and traditionally) practiced, I think prayer at official - and in particular, mandatory - events does test the limits of the Establishment Clause. Because regulations permit Chaplains to recite prayers in keeping with their personal faith, and because 97% of the Chaplain Corps identifies as Christian, few (if any) official prayers are truly non-sectarian, regardless of whether the Chaplain in question omits specific words (e.g., Jesus) or not. This cannot help but imply official endorsement.

However, I don't think banning it is a solution. First, human beings have a strong preference for ritual and ceremony that transcends traditional boundaries. Second, when it's done right, I see some limited value in prayer. Not in the sense of invoking gods or spirits, but rather as a means of quieting the mind and focusing intent. Third, Chaplains have the authority to find and recruit representatives of other traditions for the purpose of serving everyone. Typically, this is only done in response to specific requests for accommodation, but I see no reason whatsoever a Chaplain couldn't arrange to have a representative of another religious identity - he/she doesn't need to be ordained - offer an invocation and/or benediction. An official prayer might therefore be given by a Jew, Muslim, Hindu, or Humanist (for example), as well as Christian, possibly on a rotating basis, and possibly upon receiving a request for just that sort of accommodation. In fact, this is how some civil authorities are addressing the question in response to pressure to remove sectarian prayer from official meetings. I think this is a more equitable solution than either keeping things as they are or banning it entirely.
SSG Program Control Manager
1
1
0
A moment of silence so that people can pray or meditate or mentally run through the list of things they need to pick up from the commissary on the way home from work is appropriate. It respects peoples right to pray or not pray, and affords everyone who wants to take a moment in prayer the opportunity. Should someone presume to be able to speak in prayer for everyone in attendance at a mandatory event? Never.
(1)
Comment
(0)
CPT Pedro Meza
CPT Pedro Meza
8 y
SSG (Join to see) - The First Church of Cannabis was approved after Indiana’s religious freedom law was passed; imagine the ARMY Chaplin from this church "“If someone is smoking in our church, God bless them,” Levin said. “This is a church to show a proper way of life, a loving way to live life. We are called ‘cannataerians.'”
(0)
Reply
(0)
SSG Program Control Manager
SSG (Join to see)
8 y
CPT Pedro Meza - A modern day Cult of Liber Pater?
(1)
Reply
(0)
CPT Pedro Meza
CPT Pedro Meza
8 y
SSG (Join to see) - In ancient Roman religion and mythology, Liber /ˈlaɪbər/ ("the free one"; Latin: Līber [ˈliːbɛr]), also known as Liber Pater ("the free Father") was a god of viticulture and wine, fertility and freedom. I drink wine, and I am a father too.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SSG Program Control Manager
SSG (Join to see)
8 y
CPT Pedro Meza - We should all honor the Free Father. :)
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
MSG Dan Castaneda
1
1
0
After surviving some of the things I've seen, I have become very religious. It has been a great change in my life and enjoy praying at military functions. Especially before Airborne operations.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SPC Air Defense Enhanced Early Warning System Operator
1
1
0
I think it's an important part of our Country's and Military's heritage. Talking about Christianity here. I am not religious either but a lot of our founding fathers were and the principles of this great Country is very much so founded on Christian principles. It's not there to offend you or coerce or recruit you to Christianity. It's there to show you and others that we are all brothers and sisters working together. I've never heard a Chaplain say "Let us pray to Jesus". It's always just "Let us pray". You can pray to anything or anyone or just sit quietly with your head down and reflect. If your offended by that then you probably shouldn't be in the Military.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CPT Robert Boshears
1
1
0
As a famous saying goes: There are no atheists in fox holes.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Capt Gregory Prickett
Capt Gregory Prickett
8 y
That's not correct, there have been plenty of atheists in foxholes.
(1)
Reply
(0)
CPT Robert Boshears
CPT Robert Boshears
8 y
Not knowing the estimated numbers, how many prayed? Every day we had a Full Bull Chaplain, with a CIB, make his rounds, and he prayed for all of us...married, single, gay, straight and atheists. My dog tags, that one is still with me and one I left in Vietnam, for religion has "no preference". I don't demand that the Ten Commandments be removed from court houses to please a few, anymore than I demand that the Rebel Flag be removed. I, personally have gone to Christian services, Jewish services...and even went to a Mosque. For all I care you can pray to a Donkey. It is not up to me to tell you different, I just didn't see any non-believers sticking their heads up any higher than I would.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SPC Gerardo Aguilar
1
1
0
Let them pray. It never hurt me to do so. I don't happen to care what they believe. As long as we all fight side by side, nothing else matters.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
COL Sam Russell
1
1
0
NO.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Capt Gregory Prickett
Capt Gregory Prickett
8 y
COL Sam Russell - Sir, I'm sorry that you feel that it is appropriate to violate your oath to uphold the Constitution and to protect the religious rights of non-believers.

Hopefully you will not be in a position to mandate such violations in the future.
(0)
Reply
(0)
COL Sam Russell
COL Sam Russell
8 y
Capt Gregory Prickett - I know what I swore to defend, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof."

So, let me get this right, or allow me to "clarify" your last statement. You believe that any commander who sanctions, endorses, supports, or tolerates his or her chaplain saying an invocation and/or benediction, in accordance with their faith, at a change of command ceremony, such commanders are unfit to command? That would mean... EVERY commander in the history of our military is/was unfit to command. What a preposterous notion.
Your expression of ill will toward me at the end of your statement speaks more of you than of me.
Again, may God bless you, and may his peace be with you.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Capt Gregory Prickett
Capt Gregory Prickett
8 y
COL Sam Russell - Sir, to clarify for you, I believe that it is inappropriate to force people to participate in a religious exercise. I further believe that the law is very clear on this, that the government may not coerce individuals to participate in prayer. That's based on my personal research of the law, and not only the relevant court decisions (several of which I mentioned above), but on related scholarship on the issue. That includes an article by two professors of law at the U.S.A.F. Academy (see Religion in the Military: Navigating the Channel Between the Religion Clauses, 59 A.F. L. Rev. 1 (2007)); an evaluation of coercion in an article on chaplains (see Entangled Choices: Selecting Chaplains for the United States Armed Forces, 56 Ala. L. Rev. 247 (2004)); and an in-depth review of religion in the military (see The God Exclusion: The Constitutional Implications of Proselytization and Religious Discrimination in the U.S. Military, 76 Brooklyn L. Rev. 807 (2011)). I'm not pulling this out of thin air, nor is it based on my opinion, but on the law.

Second, your statement on all other commanders having violated the Establishment Clause by having a Chaplain-led prayer at at change of command ceremony is just incorrect. I have attended a number of those ceremonies where there was no such invocation; indeed, my own change of command ceremonies (both incoming and outgoing) did not have a prayer or invocation. It's not required by TC 3-21.5 (the old FM 22-5)--indeed, it is not mentioned except for military funerals. It's labeled as optional in AFPAM 34-1202 (Guide to Protocol). It is an optional part of the ceremony and I've been to both Army and Air Force ceremonies without an invocation or prayer.

Third, I have expressed no ill-will towards you, please do not read more into my comments than I have stated. I hope that you will not coerce people into participating in religious activity, that's all. That says nothing about anything else, neither potential future commands or promotions are commented on. To be clear, I have no problem with you being promoted to flag rank, nor to future commands, but I do hope that you don't order people to events and then force religion on them. I hope that you are not in a position to do so, which can mean that you have a superior that would prevent it. My comment had nothing to do with ill-will towards you, but more to do with protecting the rights of service members.

Finally, since you feel the need to bring your faith into our conversation...let me offer a prayer for you.

In his name we pray our glorious Flying Spaghetti Monster show Col. Russell the error of his ways. Touch him with your noodly appendage and show him that he must accept you. In your name we pray. R'Amen.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Sgt Jim Weeder
Sgt Jim Weeder
8 y
I have never heard a Chaplin say "let us pray, that's an order". If that was said then it would be forcing you to pray. Since it is not, it isn't. I do not know when the chaplin tool box was written but most likely before we were pissing everyone off with everything. My ex wife had no religion and she was in the Air Force also and I never heard her say "That chaplain at the commanders call today pissed me off because he made me pray". To this day I do not get upset when a invocation is said because I know for some or most in the group it brings comfort to them. At 63 years old I have bigger fish to fry than get pissed off at an invocation. They are not forcing me to join their religion so why make a mountain out of a mole hill.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Capt Jason S.
1
1
0
As long as each faith is allowed to pray then it should not be banned, we have a right of freedom of speech and freedom of religion in the USA, people have died for that right! We live in a free country and people are going to say things that are not believed by others and that is ok. It is even ok not to agree with them. If we can't be adults about it. Then accept that people have a right to their opinion and vice versa, then maybe you should rethink why you have such a problem with what the other person is saying and why you can't give them the respect, love and time to honor their God/Gods or whatever they draw strength from that helps them be a better person? The problem is not them but yours. You are infringing on their freedoms of public speech.
We made choices to join the military or take jobs. These jobs require us to do certain things but The Government can’t take our rights away to pray in public (even in school) or private away, no matter how much we dislike it. Our Constitution is manly there to protect from the oppression of the Government! The British and other European Countries denied certain rights which our Constitution now guarantees because people died for them.
Now I agree no Atheist should be forced to pray, just like no Muslim, Jew, Christian, Buddhist or any other religious person should be denied their right to pray. If you don’t want to say the pledge of allegiance to the US Flag no one is forced to do so but if you want to do it you can. Now I will tell you I am a Christian and I pray. I also say the pledge in honor to all the service members who served the flag and died defending The Flag! Now I hope everyone would say the pledge of allegiance but I would not want to force anyone because it might be against their beliefs for some reason. It doesn’t make me mad or upset.
I respect the other religions too, I would like to see all my friend become Christians but understand that some are Jews, Muslims, Atheist and so forth. All I can do is pray for them and show the love of Christ. I know I fall short and have my moments that I sin and I pull myself back up again. I hope this helps shed light on the situation from a Christian’s point of view. I hope I do not offend too many people but educate many. May God bless all who read this in some way.
(1)
Comment
(0)
A1C Cyber Systems Operations
A1C (Join to see)
8 y
I like that you were respectful in your rebuttal. Very rare, so I will do the same. I would never take someone's right to pray in private, even if the constitution disagreed with me. Even prayer in appropriate events (individual ceremonies such as graduations and promotions where the promoter requests it, chaple lead events, and funerals) I agree with and am 100% ok with. The issue I have is when a mandatory event is lead with a Christian prayer when all in attendance are not Christian. I feel the same for schools. I believe it should be allowed for all students to have their religious clubs, allow them to pray on their own at lunch or in their own groups, and allow them to carry their religious text around. The issue I have with schools is when the bible or other religious text is taught as fact in history and science classes, and when it is faculty lead prayer in an open setting. Refrence is fine (this religion believes this, that religion believes that etc...). I would never take away someone's religion, but I don't feel it's appropriate to force others to tolerate your religious practices when the same religion is not tolerating the practices of others.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Capt Jason S.
Capt Jason S.
8 y
Thank you for being respectful and mature. I believe more people should have adult conversations and be gentlemen.
It has been shown that up to 60% of Church goers may not believe but attend for the social aspect. So if by what you are saying then people in religious institutions should not teach, pray or practice their faith in their institutions unless everyone is a believer?
Tolerance is expected by people of religious background in all instances by society. We seem to be held to an extremely high standard and I don’t blame them. I only wish we all were perfect but sadly we are not made that way. Christian’s strive to be like Christ and we are told to Love God above all else then love your neighbor as yourself. We are expected to tolerate people swearing, some don’t drink or smoke and that is intolerable for them. Porn in society is extremely intolerable to many religious people but we are forced to endure it in America. Christians are forced to adapt to the work culture. I am pressured or flat out told I had to work Sundays and Christmas regardless of my beliefs while non-Christians celebrated. So to tell me that learning about the history of religious groups or seeing people pray is intolerable or offensive seems like a pretty small offense.
Yet, when a person is a believer states their belief they are attacked. A non-believer may not like that God and Religion has been the driving force of history for almost all of history for most of the World in some way or another. When you don’t teach all of history then you are doomed to ignorance. People can’t make good decisions with partial information. I like to look at all the facts over a period of time and continue to reevaluate the information as it develops.
My faith over time has only grown from my experiences. As a critical care air transport (CCAT) nurse and ICU charge nurse I have seen traumas in the USAF that you would not ever want to see and few have seen in the civilian world.
I am glad you shared your point of view on the subject because it allows for a great back and forth discussion. Thank you for your respectful point of view. Hopefully we can continue this.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Sgt Jim Weeder
Sgt Jim Weeder
8 y
As of right now religion is not taught in public schools. Some churches have Sunday school where religion is taught. The parents of the children know what is being taught. The Catholics have schools that teach religion and once again the parents know this. Yes in the before said schools science is lacking an example; I was talking with one of my sons on evolution my ex wife came into the room when I was talking about Darwin theory, she had a quizzical look on her face. I then said after quick thought "Oh that's right you went to Catholic school". No one at these mandatory meetings if forcing you to do anything. An example of forcing would be the changing they did to the pledge of allegiance, "under God" was added in the 50's? I believe by Eisenhower if I recall right.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Capt Jason S.
Capt Jason S.
8 y
I understand Darwin theory and believe it should be taught in school, just as creation should be taught also, both should be examined. If we can't be open to looking at these theories in a school setting then there is little hope for our society.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
MSgt Darren VanDerwilt
1
1
0
I agree that mandatory formations are best to be prayer free. Military Chaplains normally stay "Deity" neutral at these events, it's awkward. Now for the hard part. Atheists are quick to mistake the establishment clause as a zero anything that may be construed religious, especially Christianity, law. It clearly states that Congress is prohibited from making any law that recognizes an establishment of religion, much like we see in Saudi Arabia and Iran. They fail to read the next clause in the first amendment that prohibits Congress from banning the exercise of religion. Key here, the Bill of Rights restricts what Congress can do, not what individuals, commanders, public school teachers, etc., can do. We, as citizens, have to put up with hearing and seeing many things we don't agree with. We, as citizens, have a choice, ignore it, look away, change the channel, develop a counter argument, or tune it out. That's what people of faith do when confronted with the ever growing number of things anti-religious zealots foist upon them.
(1)
Comment
(0)
A1C Cyber Systems Operations
A1C (Join to see)
8 y
The only way I can think to counter this would to say that the military is a government agency and cannot endorse any set religion. The chaplains I have seen use terms like, "God" "all mighty" and "the one and only" so I may be biased here.
(2)
Reply
(0)
MSgt Darren VanDerwilt
MSgt Darren VanDerwilt
8 y
Again, the key word in the 1st Amendment is "Congress." Since our constitution provides Congress as the only branch of the national government allowed to write legislation, they are the only ones that could come up with such a rule. However, Congress is restricted by the 1st Amendment from making such a law. Furthermore, only Congress is allowed to regulate the armed forces, not the President as so many think. Therefore, only Congress can provide a regulation limiting religious practice in the armed forces. But oops! Congress cannot make a law (regulation) because the 1st Amendment protects religious liberty. Be happy this is the case. What you propose leads down a slippery slope that our founders were wise enough to help us avoid. Be glad in the knowledge that we still have freedom of conscience. After all, that's what you swore/affirmed to uphold and defend.
(0)
Reply
(0)
MSgt Darren VanDerwilt
MSgt Darren VanDerwilt
8 y
I'll further add, it's only words. Words don't hurt. When someone is praying, they're not taking anything away from you. You're not required to bow your head, say Amen, or do anything. Relax and be glad it's not another suicide prevention, don't drink and drive, or please don't rape anyone briefings.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close