Should President Trump provide credibility back to UCMJ by charging to start with: Admiral Green, Adm Gilday, Secretary Spencer?

Unless they violate a direct order like Secretary Spencer, no charges necessary. But RADM Green and ADM Gilday should seriously consider whether or not they want to continue to lead Armed Forces. If they have an ethical problem with respecting the CINC they should honorably resign their commissions and enter the private sector.

the presidents actions have under minded a system that requires for a service member to act in an inhumane manner to the enemy forces, to be held accountable those acts of insanity and disrespect to the deceased. How would your family feel if that picture taken of their loved one being displayed as a war trophy, is on the cover of some new media?

What the CINC does is way above my pay scale. A previous President pardoned a known spy who was court martialed and less is being said about that. Both actions are their prerogatives.

The President of the Unites States is the Commander-in-Chief and the military officers have no say in what he does or does not do!

If you served in the field you would agree the decisions must be made by the one facing the enemy,not someone not there. He should never have been charged.

For everyone writing here, what part of "Commander" is not Understood. We have all seen injustices committed by All levels of Command, that's why we have the system we have.

Not only do I agree, there has ALWAYS been civilian leadership of the Armed Forces. Like it or not the UCMJ applies to all members of the military.
As far as President Trump being a draft dodger; get your head out of your a--. Medical issues is not being a draft dodger.

Best check out the professional political leaders in Congress first. Maybe some people will learn who authorized violation of the Declaration of war provision of our Constitution and have all these " Police Actions' for their political career. Hint started with Harry Truman

That C*nt in Chief has sold us out to the Saudis and Russians and you wanna talk about dereliction of duty when actual professional officers want to find a way around his idiot ideas for the betterment of the troops?! Really?!
There’s a reason you’re likely to never go further than SPC knowing so lottile about what leadership means. Get out now if you haven’t already.

As the late COL David Hackworth often spoke of, there are "perfumed princes" who have been promoted amidst the officer corps and they are all too often in lofty positions with little to no effectual experience in combat operations or support thereof. And if combat operations don't occur for a significant period of time, that experience is no where in their résumés. Those are the political junkies, who had the class rings or select membership/mentorship at the time of their promotions, and the march goes on, because like breeds like. One can have generations of a certain "type" of soldier, sailor, airman or Marine, and that's more likely to occur in the officer side of the house than the enlisted world. Why? Because the former is far more politically charged, especially at the flag officer ranks. That said, there can and there are echelons of promotions for such cheerleaders, and don't think for a nanosecond that they got there devoid of political leanings.