Posted on Jan 24, 2014
SSG Aircraft Powerplant Repairer
36.3K
159
80
1
1
0
In your opinion, do you believe these groups should have the right to be more lax? If so, with which standards should they be given privilege to waive? If you believe all standards should be followed regardless, have you honestly made proper on-the-spot corrections toward any of these members?
Avatar feed
Responses: 20
SSG V. Michelle Woods
18
18
0
Eagles cheerleader afghanistan
2671797000 f573708786
Of course not! We should adjust the Army to adhere to Special Forces and Spec. Ops. standards. Give every soldier the equal opportunity to look like A or B :)
(18)
Comment
(0)
CW2 Squadron Maintenance Technician
CW2 (Join to see)
>1 y
1LT Rachel Washburn (A) she was in my last unit's brigade cultural support team. Also former Philadelphia Eagles cheerleader. Airborne, Air Assault. Overall she's a really nice person. (Rank according to last I knew while we were in Afghanistan). All that jazz aside if the Army wants us to blend in with our surroundings then yes I agree every soldier should have the opportunity to look A or B. Then again our body sizes, all the gear, and carrying something other than an AK-47 sort of make us stand out like a sore thumb so I don't see how the beard will help, same goes with the headdress.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SFC First Sergeant
SFC (Join to see)
>1 y
there mission is different which requires them to operate and do certain things and be a certain way such as grow beards and blend in so yeah that is why they fall under socom not forscom 
(0)
Reply
(0)
SSG V. Michelle Woods
SSG V. Michelle Woods
>1 y
SSG Shane Welsh because I don't want to compete against her lol!
(0)
Reply
(0)
SGT Richard H.
SGT Richard H.
11 y
CW2 (Join to see) In the case of beards, etc., "blending in" isn't so much about making the other guys mistake us for them, but rather making them identify with us by having a common social standard.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Michael Hartwig
17
17
0
I have had the privilege to work with some of the SOF community. &nbsp;You will never find a more ready unit anywhere. &nbsp;As for standards? &nbsp;If their mission dictates a full beard and never using your last name or rank and they need to stay in that mind set then so be it. &nbsp;WE as NCOs should focus more on the Soldiers in our ranks and the standards falling year to year than those that put their lives in harms way daily and rarely get the limelight.<div><br></div>
(17)
Comment
(0)
SGT Cda 564, Assistant Team Sergeant
SGT (Join to see)
12 y
Very well said SFC!
(0)
Reply
(0)
MSG Gene Potocki
MSG Gene Potocki
12 y
Outstanding Comment!!
(0)
Reply
(0)
SFC William Swartz Jr
SFC William Swartz Jr
12 y
Well said!
(0)
Reply
(0)
1px xxx
Suspended Profile
>1 y
Well Said SFC
Avatar small
SFC Special Forces Communications Sergeant
12
12
0
We are absolutely upheld to the standards of AR670-1, Unless there is an operational requirement to deviate. If that is the case, we have a written order from an 0-5 or higher.<div>When you say standards, do you mean just 670-1 standards, or are you talking all Army standards.. From my experience, my team is required to meet all Army standards, whether it be PT, 670-1, Counseling, NCOER, NCOPD, marksmanship, UPL, DUI, Military drivers license, care of equipment, accountability (personnel and equipment).. you name it.</div><div><br></div><div>I have experienced both sides of the fence, and I will tell you first hand the average Special Forces Soldier takes standards very serious. In all aspects of our work. I feel this is what separates SF Soldiers from a lot of other Soldiers in our ranks. The level of responsibility that a SSG has in SF requires him to take standards personal, because if we deviate on the standards then we have the possibility for a National or Strategic level effect. Most Soldiers do not have this level of responsibility as a young SGT or SSG.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>The bottom line is, A standard is a standard...&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>vr</div><div>SFC Smith</div>
(12)
Comment
(0)
SGT Journeyman Plumber
SGT (Join to see)
12 y
More people need to read your words sergeant.
(2)
Reply
(0)
2LT Earl Dean
2LT Earl Dean
7 y
Amen, if can't do the small stuff you will for sure not be able to do the hard stuff. Assigned to a ranger company I thought I was gonna die before I cought up to their standards which to me was way above normal Army standard.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Avatar feed
Should Special Forces & Spec. Ops. be exempt from certain Army Standards?
1SG(P) First Sergeant
11
11
0
Edited 12 y ago
The key consideration is the operational environment.&nbsp; The good SF soldier should know when it's necessary to be in what were once called "starches and spits" and when such matters are trivial.&nbsp; As for relaxed grooming standards, they're typically approved by an O-6 and usually as an FP measure.<br>
(11)
Comment
(0)
MAJ Brian Miller
MAJ Brian Miller
12 y
As a prior operator and Infantry enlisted soldier there are many differences between unconventional (SOF units) and conventional (Reg Army Combat Arms Units) units and their related missions.  The operational environment is key to both sides of the house as stated above.  SOF missions are completely different from the conventional military during combat operations.  Don't compare apples to oranges in the combat environment.  When we were back in garrison we kept to the conventional standards but when we were in the operational mode we were/are allowed relaxed standards the befitted the missions.  This is a common problem with the conventional side of the house because you don't understand what SOF does so you assume they should be following the same regulations or standards you have. Regulations are only guidelines not to be taken verbatim because the battle space is an ever changing monster.  If you want to know more about the SOF community than show your metal, go through one of the SOF programs i.e. SFAS, SEAL School, PJ school, FORCE RECON and earn the right to be one of the 10%ers who can grow their beards out.  Don't get on an open format like this and start saying it's not fair that they can do this so why can't I.    
(9)
Reply
(0)
SPC Engine Mechanic
SPC (Join to see)
12 y
ok so they have a mission that doesn't give them 3-5 minutes in 24 HOURS to shave? hmmm...
(0)
Reply
(7)
SSG(P) G6 Ncoic
SSG(P) (Join to see)
12 y
absolutley, mission dependent of course.  Someone is always going to hate though!
(0)
Reply
(0)
SGT Bn C&E Ncoic
SGT (Join to see)
>1 y
SSG Shane Welsh you got lucky. Infantry uplift teams now have to shave DAILY. But they do an outstanding job out there with the teams never the less.

Regarding the shaving thing, while I'm not an operator, I am SOF support in Afghan right now and we do have to shave everyday in our camp because the SOF Command is here, but we are allowed civilian clothes and when I go out on mission I do not shave. I've had a few SNCO's from Big Army question me because I'm walking around in civie's with a military issued M9 on my waist.
Regarding the team guys, they're not allowed to grow beards to be cool, it's more about operational requirements.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Cda 564, Assistant Team Sergeant
5
5
0
There is a time and place for everything! Would you give a medic a negative counseling statement for being out of uniform because he used his shirt as a bandage for a casualty?? No you wouldn't even thought the regulations say you should.<div><br></div><div>I have had the opportunity to train as part of an ODA and deployed with two different ODAs, and contrary to popular belief these guys are not cowboys. Their moves are calculated and precise, if they need to look like American soldiers they will be in regulation per their command teams orders. If they need to look the opposite they do, also per their command. &nbsp;They are not doing it to push the rules, or be different, they are doing it because it is part of their skill set. Even the simplest thing like hands in the pockets, calling one another by first names, no parade rest or saluting unless absolutely necessary. You see it all day every day in the SOF community. No one says anything. Unconventional Warfare, is as much a state of mind and muscle memory as it is anything.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>&nbsp;If you take a regular army soldier and a SOF soldier shave head and clean shave both, have them separately talk to one person for 20 min then afterwards ask that person which one of those was a soldier, they will choose the regular Army guy 9 out of 10 times. Not because of haircut or shave, because of mannerisms and speech. &nbsp;You cant expect these men to act like super squared away extreme regulation soldiers like regular army guys, because their job is to blend in not stand out. &nbsp;Its something you are taught when studying UW. Dress and appearance are the obvious ones, but anyone can change clothes, grow hair and not shave. Its not having those other tell tell signs of being a soldier that can save your life.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>As a regular Army soldier your first instinct when approached by a senior NCO is parade rest. Imagine that muscle memory kicks in while you are conducting pilot team ops in a foreign country where you must keep a low signature(or no signature at all), you not only endanger your team but the entire mission. You may not get shot on spot by a sniper, they may follow and observe you for months instead exposing your whole team and the whole organization you are working with just by seeing that one instant of military in you!! Patterns of life are hard to train out of someone, that is why they are allowed to look and act different. There is a reason for the madness, a very well warranted reason.&nbsp;</div>
(5)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
1SG Visual Information Operations Chief
5
5
0
Leave the Army best kept secret alone. I enjoyed my sideburns and longer hair when I was in usasoc.
(5)
Comment
(0)
SSG V. Michelle Woods
SSG V. Michelle Woods
12 y
So you could be either B or C :)
(2)
Reply
(0)
1SG Visual Information Operations Chief
1SG (Join to see)
12 y
I'm more like D
(1)
Reply
(0)
SSG V. Michelle Woods
SSG V. Michelle Woods
12 y
HAHA! well thats alright too :)
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CMDCM Gene Treants
3
3
0
Edited 12 y ago
I really do not have any problem with SF Teams having to blend in and have different grooming standards.  If a Team is aboard for a Deployment, however, when they are are on my ship, I do have a hard time with being on the mess decks in ragged, unkempt PT attire that does not look or smell good.  I have jumped all over their chiefs because of this lack of personal hygiene on the part of their Sailors and they in turn have taken care of the idiots who embarrassed their unit.  Grooming is different, but dress and hygiene aboard ships and stations should still meet the standards of the community.  As a good host, if you are here for a short stay or after a combat stop, that is different from a long term deployment.
(3)
Comment
(0)
CMDCM Gene Treants
CMDCM Gene Treants
>1 y
I remember once upon a time in the IO our Squadron was in extremely hot weather and we modified our uniforms for all hands except engineering personnel. CHiefs and Officers wore Khaki Shorts and White tee-shirts, E-6 and below wore Blue Shorts and White tee-shirts, everyone was authorized to wear sandals with straps that came around the back. Normal uniforms had to be worn in case of emergencies or for deck evolutions of course including Flight Quarters.
(0)
Reply
(0)
CPO Ars/Fod Lcpo
CPO (Join to see)
>1 y
The one group of people i don't think anyone would mind using up all the hot water on the boat for showers after they return from a mission. As long as they take one. Or two.
(2)
Reply
(0)
CMDCM Gene Treants
CMDCM Gene Treants
>1 y
CPO (Join to see) SHIP - unless it is a submarine - Darn Abuators! I want to see you land any aircraft on a boat. And remember SHIPS carry BOATS and airplanes.
(2)
Reply
(0)
CPO Ars/Fod Lcpo
CPO (Join to see)
>1 y
Silly Boat chucks...
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SPC Incoming Personnel
2
2
0
The Special Forces and Special Operations should be exempt in order to fit their own needs and missions.    Let them do their thing, so we can do ours.  
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CW2 15 B
2
2
0
I think the majority of them do stay with in the standard. At least the ones I've seen here on Bragg. I walked by a full bird with his green beret the other day and he was sharp! If I become a CSM and see a Spec Ops soldier all messe up I would not say a thing. He earned that right.
(2)
Comment
(0)
SSG Aircraft Powerplant Repairer
SSG (Join to see)
12 y
SGT Robinson,

Allowing him to remain outside of regulation, wouldn't that be going against your charge as a Noncommissioned Officer to uphold the standards of the Army?
(0)
Reply
(0)
SSG Aircraft Powerplant Repairer
SSG (Join to see)
12 y
Just playing Devil's Advocate by the way. In my opinion, some standards are ridiculous to me. Who cares if my shades are on my head or around my neck? Even hands in pockets. They're unprofessional from someone's point of view who just happened to have the position to make them prohibited acts. I hate to walk in a DFAC downrange to see all foreign forces doing the things we can't do. They still get the job done. That's what should matter, again, in my opinion.
(0)
Reply
(0)
CW2 15 B
CW2 (Join to see)
12 y
Yes SGT Brassfield but I think at that TIS as a CSM he also earned that right to make that decision on what he thinks is right to enforce or not. For instance a CSM with 31 years is a survivor. I think if he was to be calls out on not I forcing an ate up green beret he can tell that army cook that if he wants to do what he wants. Go to selection.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SFC James Baber
2
2
0

SGT B,


In reality these types of units pretty much are unofficially exempt from most grooming standards and some others that are not made known to the general consensus. If you have ever seen any of these types of troops or units during deployments, that should be obvious, I know it is easy to say that it is always somewhat lax for everyone when deployed, but this is more so for these types of units.


This is somewhat true in garrison as well, if you have ever, I am assuming maybe not since most people unless they are in the community/environment have never been anywhere near the unit AOs of some of these units on the parts of Bragg that don't even register on maps or GPS satellites, the same goes for some other SF/Spec Ops units locations across the nation. These SMs can be seen still at times looking nothing like the regulation would state that a SM should be per standards. Although I wouldn't have an issue if they made a permanent change to the regulation for their necessary needs as well.

(2)
Comment
(0)
1px xxx
Suspended Profile
12 y
I went to SFAS twice in 2012 and leading up to going, I did prep training with 10th SFG here at Ft Carson... They have their own standards in so many ways and for many good reasons. They need to be left alone in my opinion. All spec ops groups are in their own category.
SSG Aircraft Powerplant Repairer
SSG (Join to see)
12 y
SFC Baber,

Yes I've seen them around Bragg, and of course down range as well. I also agree that they have more pressing matters than sticking to regulation, most of the time.
(2)
Reply
(0)
SGT Journeyman Plumber
SGT (Join to see)
12 y
SFC Baber,

There is nothing unofficial about it. After reading SFC Steven S's post apparently they have an O-5 or higher sign off on a written order anytime SOF soldiers need to deviate from normal standards.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close