Posted on May 17, 2016
CW2 C2 Systems Integrator
23.8K
180
92
6
6
0
2371aa6
What are the implications of not being able to wear a Pro-Mask while having a beard?

Should Soldiers with dietary needs based on religion receive more BAS to pay for additional food costs?
Avatar feed
Responses: 47
Votes
  • Newest
  • Oldest
  • Votes
SGM Frederic Smith
1
1
0
"NO ECEPTIONS"!
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CPT Cmoc/ Cat Tl
1
1
0
If the Army makes exceptions to the uniform policy, then the "uniform" policy will not be uniform. The uniform policy should be call the "Army Dress Code" policy. There are temporary exceptions to the policy and that is as far as it should go, anything else defeats the purpose (and it has as you may have noticed).
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
COL Ted Mc
1
1
0
CW2 (Join to see) - Warrant; The implication of not being able to wear a "Pro-Mask" (regardless of why) is that you are likely to die if you should have been wearing one and aren't.

No. soldiers should NOT receive different rates of BAS because of their religions.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
TSgt Kenneth Ellis
1
1
0
They would not do it for Jews who wanted to wear a Yamaka.
(1)
Comment
(0)
SFC Senior Culinary Management Nco
SFC (Join to see)
9 y
They are aloud to wear them in uniform if you do not know the reg stop with the non sense a lot of you don't meet the army or military standard at all but so quick to down play one cause of a difference chaplains of all religions are represented and just want to serve they country yes I said they country... So grow up to the new world if u don't like it go home... But please stop with the racist shit
(0)
Reply
(0)
TSgt Kenneth Ellis
TSgt Kenneth Ellis
9 y
SFC (Join to see) - So you are calling me a racist because I made a statement from 1992..
(0)
Reply
(0)
SFC Senior Culinary Management Nco
SFC (Join to see)
9 y
TSgt Kenneth Ellis - No I'm saying all these statements are never called you one but those remarks are very bigot like take it how u want
(0)
Reply
(0)
SPC Clinic Ninja
SPC (Join to see)
9 y
TSgt Kenneth Ellis - Making a statement from 1992 requires you to annotate that your statement is from 1992.
This discussion is about the current military, and its accommodations. A lot has changed since '92..... I no longer wear diapers, and computers are now handheld.

Yamakas are plain black or the uniform pattern.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSgt Robert Dant
1
1
0
This should be simple - we are soldiers here to protect this great nation. We all have our own brand of religion, sexual preference, and other situations.

End of the day it is simple in my mind - we protect, we fight, we kill. An effective fighting unit cannot be worrying more about religious or PC issues.

They have to focus on the task at hand. Everyone is equal and should not get any special preference or money.

I am a Christian - you think it is not difficult for us to grow up turning the other cheek but when it comes to combat, aim, squeeze, fire!

Should we be given something for the rest of our life's for violating and Lord and Savior's commandment.

No, stay out of the pan if you cannot handle the fire!
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SPC(P) Battalion Schools Nco
1
1
0
Opinions will vary from person to person. This is only the beginning to so many more changes that will come within time with these specific things.
Do I agree with this? No. But I can't speak for anyone else. The military does try to adapt with society, should it? I don't think so, to an extent. The military isn't here to ensure that everyone gets what they want, because everyone won't. There will always be the people that get upset because they don't get what they want. In my opinion, people need to adapt. Something we all learn. Let people have their holidays, let them have veggie MRE's but there is no need to completely change certain regs because people don't want to adapt.
We are soldiers, we are to adapt to any conditions. If they wanted to have all these changes maybe they should have re thought their choices on joining.

Again. This is only an opinion.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSG John Oliver
0
0
0
The British and their Commonwealth make it work so should we.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SMSgt Bob W.
0
0
0
The military already does it. It may not be to the degree you desire. So...why the big deal. BAS increase--NO. That is the individual right to select their religion and provide support for their dietary requirements.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
LTC Raymond Buenteo
0
0
0
No. That is a Pandora’s box subject to exploitation by every dumb ass.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Jimmy Cernich
0
0
0
No no and no.United states Military United States Uniform,United States Military chow hall,United States Soldier.If you want to live by your culture go back to your country's military because they sure wouldn't let us live up to our culture.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

How are you connected to the military?
  • Active Duty
  • Active Reserve / National Guard
  • Pre-Commission
  • Veteran / Retired
  • Civilian Supporter