Posted on Jan 18, 2016
CPO Andy Carrillo, MS
2.06K
12
1
E921944c
REPORT: Petraeus, arguably the most well-known and revered military officer of his generation, retired from the Army in 2011 with the rank of a four-star general, the highest rank an Army officer can achieve. If Carter decides to strip Petraeus of his fourth star, he could be demoted to the last rank at which he “satisfactorily” served, according to military regulations.

Reducing Petraeus’s rank, most likely to lieutenant general, could mean he’d have to pay back the difference in pension payments and other benefits that he received as a retired four-star general. That would amount to hundreds of thousands of dollars over his retirement. According to Pentagon figures, a four-star general with roughly the same years of experience as Petraeus was entitled to receive a yearly pension of nearly $220,000. A three-star officer would receive about $170,000.
Posted in these groups: Original CrimeHandcuffs 2249048b PunishmentEthics logo Ethics
This is a duplicate discussion and the contents have been merged with the original discussion. Click below to see more on this topic...
SFC Dave Wynn
I think it stinks that after this long the Sec of Def. can reduce someone in rank. Even if he or she is a General officer. Yes I know he was convicted of mishandling of classified material. They should have reduced him back then. Maybe we as military community should let our voices be heard.
Responses: 1
SSgt Jamie Ritter LeBlanc
If the information was leaked during his time in the service then yes. You can not ask of your troops what you do not ask of yourself.

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close