Posted on Mar 6, 2015
MSgt Charles Johnson
4.77K
15
12
2
2
0
Electromagnetic pulse - An electromagnetic pulse (EMP), also sometimes called a transient electromagnetic disturbance, is a short burst of electromagnetic energy. Such a pulse may occur in the form of a radiated, electric or magnetic field or conducted electrical current depending on the source, and may be natural or man-made. The term "electromagnetic pulse" is commonly abbreviated to the initialism EMP. In military terminology, a nuclear warhead detonated hundreds of kilometres above the Earth's surface is known as a high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) device. Typically the HEMP device produces the EMP as its primary damage mechanism. The nuclear device does this by producing gamma rays, which in turn are converted into EMP in the mid-stratosphere over a wide area within line of sight to the detonation.

NEMP weapons are designed to maximise such effects, especially on electronic systems, and are capable of destroying susceptible electronic equipment over a wide area. The popular media often depict such EMP effects incorrectly, causing misunderstandings among the public and even professionals, and official efforts have been made in the USA to set the record straight

Apparently any unshielded electronics, can be affected by a pulse generated of sufficient strength and at a specific altitude (say over the Western USA) and it will affect such things as electronic ignitions on vehicles, electronics on aircraft and cell phones or power stations. If it has a antenna it can be affected within the zone.
Posted in these groups: Dod Defense
Avatar feed
Responses: 6
Lt Col Instructor Navigator
2
2
0
Not really. The things that will cause an EMP have other, much more immediate concerns.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Lt Col Instructor Navigator
Lt Col (Join to see)
10 y
So...will the guys be forced to wear them as well?
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Avionic Special Equipment Repairer
1
1
0
I believe that the US Military does have its assets (e.g. electronic equipment) protected from EMP. There's a component inside most military electronics and avionics equipment called a Nuclear Event Device or NED. It looks like an IC chip. A NED detects the initial bombardment of gamma radiation emitted in a nuclear blast. Once the NED detects this, the NED sends a signal to shut down the electronic equipment so as not to destroy the semiconductor device through the over saturation of electrons.

Below are some links to help you understand the principles of semiconductors, a company that manufactures NEDs :
http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/diode/diode_1.html

http://www.maxwell.com/products/microelectonics/space-nuclear-event

However, in regards shielding your civilian or commercial electronic equipment, unless it's MIL Standard design, it may not be fully protected. I'm including a link on how to protect your computer (and the Internet):
http://www.extremetech.com/computing/102633-how-to-make-sure-your-computer-and-the-internet-survives-a-nuclear-holocaust
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Program Control Manager
1
1
0
Shielding items against EMP is expensive and in most cases unnecessary. If you have a system with 6 electronic devices and 5 of them have EMP shielding, you've just wasted a lot of money. If EMP shielding going to be done it should be at the platform or system level only.
(1)
Comment
(0)
MSgt Charles Johnson
MSgt Charles Johnson
10 y
Good Comment. From what I've read if it does not have an antenna it will not be affected. Antenna being almost anything that will connect the electronics to the burst.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SGT Jim Z.
SGT Jim Z.
10 y
SSG (Join to see) EMP shielding is like having a UPS if not everything is plugged in the protection is not complete.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SSG Program Control Manager
SSG (Join to see)
10 y
MSgt Charles Johnson The thing is pretty much every device that communicates has an antenna or at least cabling that will act as an antenna. EMP resistant is a requirement for a slew of devices which are then installed in racks next to standard civilian equipment which is not EMP resistant. I believe the requirement should be removed from all equipment and only leveraged onto systems and platforms.
SGT Jim Z. Exactly, a system is only as robust as its most fragile/sensitive device. Costs and the demand to get technology into the field quickly means we integrate a lot commercial products.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close