Posted on Jun 22, 2015
SGM Matthew Quick
190K
1.73K
755
66
66
0
6e0d3e68
What do these US military bases have in common?

Fort Bragg
Fort Rucker
Fort Hood
Fort Lee
Fort Benning
Fort Gordon
Fort A.P. Hill
Fort Polk
Fort Pickett
Camp Beauregard (Operated by the Louisiana National Guard)

They are all named for Confederate generals. There’s been talk for years about whether this is appropriate, and now in wake of Charleston and the South Carolina Confederate flag, it’s coming up again.

Do you think these posts should be renamed to honor people who fought in the U.S. Army exclusively? Vote, and share your thoughts in the comments section below.

Take the Poll:
http://www.stripes.com/military-life/military-history/poll-should-us-military-bases-named-after-confederates-be-renamed-1.353890#
Posted in these groups: E83e9618 Confederate Flag
Edited 9 y ago
Avatar feed
Responses: 282
SFC(P) Petroleum Supply Specialist
2
2
0
NO!!!
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGM Senior Adviser, National Communications
2
2
0
OK--and what is the only southern base to be named after a Union general? Fort McClellan, Ala....
(2)
Comment
(0)
SFC Rollie Hubbard
SFC Rollie Hubbard
9 y
What's your point SGM? Maybe there were not a lot of great union generals to have bases named after them.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SGM Senior Adviser, National Communications
SGM (Join to see)
9 y
SFC Hubbard, the point here is military history trivia. There is only one southern base named for a union general. All the others are named for confederates. How did that happen?
(0)
Reply
(0)
1LT William Clardy
1LT William Clardy
9 y
SGM (Join to see), you are being extraordinarily trivial in a trivial discussion.

I salute you!
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SPC Miguel Rosario Cruz
2
2
0
I will say no because they were great Gen the only thing wrong was that they lost the war lol
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Rollie Hubbard
2
2
0
Why would you even ask that stupid question? No don't rename these bases.
(2)
Comment
(0)
SGM Matthew Quick
SGM Matthew Quick
9 y
Why would you respond to such a "stupid question", SFC Rollie Hubbard?
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSG John Erny
2
2
0
No, to much time has passes and the Bases have taken an Identity of their own.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
MSG Brad Sand
2
2
0
While I think I might have a problem with Fort Forrest, I think it would be a travesty to ignore our own military history. The long standing standard of naming posts, bases, centers...anything in and everything in the military...for accomplished military members should not strip these names.

As a side note, I am so very honored that the Army in their infinite wisdom would name Sand Hill for me...even naming it such before I enlisted. I really do not know how I can ever thank them enough. What an honor.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGM Steve Wettstein
2
2
0
Totally disagree! Could you imagine calling any of our bases anything but Bragg, Benning, Hood, Lee, etc?
(2)
Comment
(0)
SFC Jeff L.
SFC Jeff L.
9 y
Yes! We could rename Fort Hood in honor of a brave, freedom loving American with strong ties to the area. Proposed new name: Fort Reno.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
MAJ David Vermillion
2
2
0
You can't erase history, leave the way they are now.
(2)
Comment
(0)
CDR Michael Goldschmidt
CDR Michael Goldschmidt
9 y
Ah, MAJ David Vermillion, unfortunately you can, and this is part of an attempt to do so.
(3)
Reply
(0)
1SG Michael Blount
1SG Michael Blount
9 y
MAJ David Vermillion - yah, we're fighting our own civil war right on this page as it is.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Jeff Stevenson
2
2
0
Edited 9 y ago
I also vote NO, and here is my reasoning, First and foremost, they were all decorated military, US Military leaders. Guess history forgot that both sides were US Military and hence the military bases being named. This is in part due to the deeds and accomplishments while serving. I really have no opinion on what side they served, it was still US Military service and they should be honored. I also have to agree with Cpl Craig Smith on the PC BS. Indian names to show awesomeness of an aircraft, now in question, Battle flags from the Civil War, Yes a very dark chapter, but history none the less. Until people continue to learn from our mistakes from the past, we will forever continue on our path to self destruction. History needs to be taught and learned and past down so that these issues never again darken our great nation.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
TSgt Scott Hurley
2
2
0
If I am not mistaken. All those generals served in the US Army during the Mexican American war which took place about 20yrs before the Civil War. I would also like to say that some would rejoin the US Army after the Civil War and distinguished themselves out west. I know General Lee retired to civilian life after the war. That is my take on why those posts were named after them. Of course, they could have been named after another famous Army person who served after the Civil War. Which has been lost to history.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close