Posted on Jun 15, 2015
RallyPoint Shared Content
19
19
0
Screen shot 2015 06 15 at 1.42.32 pm
Screen shot 2015 06 15 at 1.42.49 pm
Screen shot 2015 06 15 at 1.42.40 pm
Originally published on finance.yahoo.com:
--
The US Army is finally set to phase out one of the most consistent images of modern American military power: the Humvee.
Earlier this year, the US Army announced the three finalists for the massive contract to replace the iconic Humvee, which has been in service for almost three decades.

Oshkosh Corporation, defense contractor Lockheed Martin, and Humvee-maker AM General each delivered 22 prototypes of their Joint Light Tactical Vehicles (JLVT) to military evaluators, who are running elaborate tests on the vehicles to determine the best fit.

Since the 1990s, AM General's Humvee has been the US military's workhorse, first seeing action in the Gulf War.

Despite its ubiquity, the Humvee has caused some serious headaches for American forces. As Wired notes, the Humvee was designed in the 1980s as an off-road carrier to transport troops and equipment quickly across Eastern Europe in a theoretical ground war against the then Soviet Union.

But after the collapse of the Soviet Union, the Humvee's mission changed. It was deployed to the front lines in Iraq and Afghanistan, where US commanders quickly discovered that it was dangerously under equipped to protect troops against close-combat urban fire and improvised explosive devices.

With this problem in mind, the vehicles in this summer's competition are all far more resistant to explosive blasts. The new vehicles are smaller, so they can be more easily airlifted and transported. They're also light and better equipped to deal with the urban and off-road patrol duties that the Humvee took on in Afghanistan and Iraq.

The winning payout for the contract will be huge. As the Dallas Morning News reports, the US Army plans to spend billions on at least 20,000 vehicles, and the Marine Corps will likely buy around 5,000. If the vehicle is more successful, it could be an even greater windfall — since the '80s, the AM General has produced 250,000 Humvees for the US military.

Here are the three vehicles that could replace the Humvee:

Oshkosh's L-ATV

Oshkosh's entry into the competition is the Light Combat Tactical All-Terrain Vehicle.

The company has one advantage. After the Army realized in the early 2000s that the Humvee left troops vulnerable to blasts, the Pentagon ordered thousands of Oshkosh's Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) vehicles for deployment in Iraq and Afghanistan.

As the name suggests, Oshkosh's MRAP was much better suited to transport troops through these environments. Wired notes that the MRAP was so successful at sustaining blasts that some troops reportedly didn't realize when they ran over bombs.

Oshkosh's entry in the JLTV contest attempts to expand upon the MRAP's success. The L-ATV is a lighter, smaller vehicle than the MRAP and can be more quickly and easily airlifted. This makes the vehicle preferable to the MRAP, which is large and can't be deployed to areas where it needs to maneuver in crowded spaces.

Oshkosh believes that since the company demonstrated its proficiency with the MRAP, the JLTV is a natural transition.

"The Oshkosh M-ATV is the only vehicle performing the JLTV mission profile in operations today," Oshkosh Vice President of Business Development Jennifer Christiansen told Business Insider in an email.

"This is where Oshkosh is truly unique because no other company has successfully transitioned more new military vehicle programs into production for the US Department of Defense," Christiansen said.

The vehicle also has some unique features. If the military wishes to make their vehicles a little greener, Oshkosh threw an optional hybrid-diesel engine into the mix to help increase fuel efficiency.

Lockheed Martin's JLTV

Designed with anti-guerilla combat in mind, Lockheed is playing on somewhat unfamiliar ground in the ground fight. Oshkosh and AM General both have troop carriers in use by the US military, while Lockheed is still more widely known for its high-tech aircraft and missile systems.

Like the other competitors, Lockheed aimed to make its slightly boxier vehicle lighter and tested it for blast-resistance.

"It can take a soldier everywhere, but can survive everything that they could survive in an MRAP," Trevor McWilliams, a former soldier whose truck was hit with an IED, said in a Lockheed promotional video.

Lockheed is also hoping that the vehicle's price tag will persuade the military to adopt its proposal. The defense contractor's website touts the vehicle's gas mileage, low production cost, and easy adaptability in case mechanics want to add on or upgrade the car in the shop.

"We are providing the most capable vehicle to our soldiers and our marines, and we're going to do it a very affordable cost," Lockheed Martin program director Katheryn Hasse told Army Recognition in 2014.

AM General's BRV-O

Though the Humvee itself may be on the way out, the lessons it learned have been passed on to AM General's 21st century version.

This time around, AM General has built the Humvee's largest weakness into the vehicle's name: the Blast-Resistant Vehicle Off-Road. The company is highlighting the renewed safety of their BRV-O, touting its blast-resistant frame and space for amour add-ons.

"The Humvee was not designed for underbody protection, so the BRV-O has a higher ground clearance and is able to apply a protection kit to the bottom of the vehicle," AM General Vice President of Business Development Chris Vanslanger told CNN in 2012.

According to AM General, the BRV-O is also the only vehicle equipped with a system that allows all passengers to connect to the military's C4ISR network, which helps troops, aircraft, and commanders link up and coordinate movements on the battlefield.

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/3-high-tech-vehicles-vying-182352504.html
Posted in these groups: Vehicle Vehicle
Avatar feed
Responses: 45
SPC David Hannaman
2
2
0
THANK GOD!

- I thought it was a POS when I traded in the 1008's and 1009'.
- I thought it was stupid that there was a center console big enough to sleep in, but there wasn't enough room for my legs, gas mask, Kevlar, and flack vest.
- I thought it was a POS when trying to start it in the "chilly" winters at Ft Campbell incorrectly required an engine change (I'd hate to see what happened at bases where it got cold).
- I thought it was a POS when the top speed couldn't keep up with a 5 Ton.
- I thought it was idiotic when they came out with the H2 and soccer mom's everywhere started banging their doors into other people because the freaking thing barely fits into a parking spot.

The only thing good I can say about it is it had a heck of a lot of ground clearance for something with a center of gravity that low.
(2)
Comment
(0)
SPC David Hannaman
SPC David Hannaman
9 y
SFC James Sczymanski - I"m guessing you're able to park your H2 in a single parking spot in addition to not being a soccer mom... ?

Yup, it's like they designed the suspension and drive train, then ran out of money and started slapping leftover parts on it.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SPC David Hannaman
SPC David Hannaman
9 y
TSgt David L. - There's a video on you tube of a H1 playing "tug of war" with a Ford pickup. The video ends with the Ford snapping a drive shaft and the camera operator yelling "That's a 4 cylinder Cummins" meaning they had swapped in a 4BT most likely. It would be a good engine swap, but still doesn't address the drivers compartment being too small for even an average sized person.
(0)
Reply
(0)
TSgt David L.
TSgt David L.
9 y
SPC David Hannaman, I haven't seen that. I'll have to see if I can find that one.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
PV2 Senior Web Designer, Web Team Lead
2
2
0
Nooooooooooooooo!
(2)
Comment
(0)
SSG Roger Ayscue
SSG Roger Ayscue
9 y
DEAR GOD I loved the Jeep!
(2)
Reply
(0)
1LT William Clardy
1LT William Clardy
9 y
SFC James Sczymanski and SSG Roger Ayscue, are you gents referring to the WW2 Willys MB and Ford GPWs, or to the Vietnam-era M151 quarter-ton truck?
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SrA Daniel Hunter
1
1
0
It's an Oshkosh by gosh...someone was going to say it, why not me?
(1)
Comment
(0)
SGT Infantryman (Airborne)
SGT (Join to see)
>1 y
I'm sure that will become the slogan used by the troops. Glad you said it first, SrA Daniel Hunter.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SGT James Allen
1
1
0
I always thought the humvee was a bad truck. Give me a jeep any day.
I had a hand in building the first armored humvees. We started out making under armor kits to send to Somalia. We formed, fitted and welded them by hand. Then we made the fully armored prototypes. They were way too heavy. We had to put rear springs on the front so it didn't look like a hot rod. And forget about going off road; I test drove the prototype and as soon as I hit a little mud I was axle deep in it.
(1)
Comment
(0)
SGT Infantryman (Airborne)
SGT (Join to see)
>1 y
Thanks for your input SGT James Allen. That's very interesting to me. They sure took off and civilian Humvees were sold. No that has stopped. Maybe because of the the same reason as you experienced.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SPC Infantryman
1
1
0
Cigarette smoke-proof interiors and built-in spitter holders are a must.
(1)
Comment
(0)
SGT Infantryman (Airborne)
SGT (Join to see)
>1 y
I think I saw that as some of the changes, SPC (Join to see). LOL
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSgt Carpenter
1
1
0
I really hope that the Oshkosh LATV has more room than the MATV does. I really have a hard time believing anybody ever approved purchase of the MATV. Can't see out of it, and if you're over 6 feet tall, you pretty much have to be a gunner, because you can't fit in the thing.
(1)
Comment
(0)
SGT Infantryman (Airborne)
SGT (Join to see)
>1 y
SSgt (Join to see), Thank you for your input. I enjoy hearing true stories from those who experienced them.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CPT Owner
1
1
0
That BRV-O looks Really cool
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CPT Graduate Student
1
1
0
A) what ever the winner is we won't see them for another ten years. B) Are they going to test their applicability to all the uses of the HMMV? How applicable will these vehicles be to a FA unit for moving Howitzers? How much ammo can they carry? How many of these will it take to carry all the required BII and crew? How about ADA units requirements? I'm sure there are several other army branches that have requirements that will go overlooked aswell.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SPC Danny Eldridge
1
1
0
What I'm feeling must be similar to how the previous generation felt when they phased out the Jeep
(1)
Comment
(0)
1LT William Clardy
1LT William Clardy
9 y
Kids these days!
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CW2 Squadron Maintenance Technician
1
1
0
If I had my choice I'd go with Oshkosh. Tired of having to fix stuff from multiple manufacturers when it comes to the wheeled vehicle fleet. The company itself has an excellent upgrade program and already took over the FMTV platform from Stewart/Stevenson--making it way more reliable in the process. Add the Tac-4 suspension to the JLTV and you wont have as much of an issue when it comes to adding the armor. My only suggestion if they were awarded the contract is to get rid of the master kill switch that that of the M-ATV--it's garbage and none of the vehicle operators follow the proper shut down sequence for it--killing the ECU. It would also save from having different FSR's for these since it'd be the same company that produces the HEMTT, PLS and again the FMTV.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close