Posted on Nov 16, 2016
Maj John Bell
6.68K
6
6
2
2
0
Avatar feed
Responses: 3
CDR Michael Goldschmidt
1
1
0
How would I know? I served on a Spru Can, but never on a Zoomie!
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
LT Marc Blaydoe
0
0
0
Edited >1 y ago
I was on the Arthur W. Radford, I remember going through sea state 8 around Cape Hatteras. It was not a pleasant experience, but I really am interested in seeing how the Zumwalt does in rough seas. The Spru suffers from the stupid design with that "break" just forward of the superstructure instead of a smooth transition like the Burkes, that creates a major stress point. On the Zumwalt, with that crazy sail of a superstructure and so much flat surface freeboard, I predict she is going to be a real hog in heavy seas.

Besides that, the Zumwalt is just plain butt-ugly. Give me an Arleigh Burke any day.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
LCDR Vice President
0
0
0
Edited 8 y ago
Zumwalt with her wave-piercing inverted bow and tumblehome hull is much more advanced then the old Spruance cans, with all the other issues sprucans had I would take a ride in the Zumwalt over one of them anyday.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Maj John Bell
Maj John Bell
8 y
It seems to me that the tumble home would produce more cases of green water over the bow, and reverse slamming. Also Tumble home doesn't do much the reduce pitch and heave.
(0)
Reply
(0)
LCDR Vice President
LCDR (Join to see)
8 y
Lots of research and science supports the hull design. I know the one exotic hull design I got to sail on (HSV2 Swift) was a far superior and fast ride than the conventional hull ships I have driven. And in the hands of a good ship driver you really do not have to worry about pitch and heave in heavy seas.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Maj John Bell
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close