Posted on Jan 10, 2015
To join a reserve component, should it be a required to serve X amount of active duty time first?
63.7K
288
160
16
13
3
It seems there is a lack of experience or a "different" mentality in the reserves, from what I can only guess is from not being immersed in the military lifestyle every day for longer than basic training. I think a good answer to this is make a two year active duty minimum prerequisite to join any reserve component. Just a thought. Might not be THE way, but it's A way.
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 99
Most of the officers I served with in the Reserves had significant active duty service. I am also impressed with the professionalism of many of our younger reserve soldiers. Many have had multiple combat tours while deplyed to Iraq and Afghanistan. The difference is not as great as some would have us believe.
(0)
(0)
I've been in the Army National Guard for 14 years, 10 of those as ADOS/AGR/Deployed status. First of all, I don't see an issue of a 'different mentality' as mentioned. We all go through the same training, the same requirement, and same deployments. We have the same standards as well, the ONLY difference is full-time vs. Part-time. I know many Soldiers who have never been part of Active Army who lack nothing in comparison. I would actually argue that it takes an immense amount of responsibility, accountability and self control to lead the two lives Reservists lead.
(0)
(0)
"Immersed in the military lifestyle" is a fairly subjective phrase. Do Reserve component Soldiers have a more relaxed demeanor? Yes. Does this affect their performance during a deployment? I would argue that it does not.
My first question when receiving a new Soldier in the unit is whether she or he can do their job to or above standard. Proficiency is built at the unit level, whether Active, Guard, or Reserve. I have had excellent Soldiers who have spent their entire careers in the Guard and Soldiers just off Active duty that I wished I could give back, and vice-versa.
My first question when receiving a new Soldier in the unit is whether she or he can do their job to or above standard. Proficiency is built at the unit level, whether Active, Guard, or Reserve. I have had excellent Soldiers who have spent their entire careers in the Guard and Soldiers just off Active duty that I wished I could give back, and vice-versa.
(0)
(0)
I think it's a great idea. Speaking from experience with over nine years in a Infantry Guard Unit. I think one year or two would be extremely beneficial. The experience and knowledge of AD soldiers could only benefit the unit. The way I understand this discussion it's not about the Guards ability to fight rather the professionalism and customs,appearance of the individual soldier. The Guard soldiers I served with all wanted to be the best at everything, and never be out classed by any unit Guard or Active. I think many Guardsmen would be willing to do a few years AD.
(0)
(0)
AD lifestyle has a huge safety net...RC does not. AD folks who don't thing the RC doesn't measure up need go be put on indefinite deployment without RC backing them up in their bubble of superiority .
(0)
(0)
I spent 35 years Active, Reserve and National Guard before retiring in 2006. You are correct that there is a "different" mentality in the Reserves and more so in the Guard because the mission is different. They are not preparing for combat every day so priorities, training and attitudes change. It is not a lack of experience as it is a different way of looking at the mission.
(0)
(0)
PO1 Ron Clark
Chief, I spent 17 years in the Navy Reserve and four of those years were on a reserve ship, which during my time spent aboard, we only missed one weekend period not being out to sea and training for our mission during that four year period. That was the period when all of the powers that be were touting the military service as not active or reserve but one community.
(0)
(0)

Suspended Profile
Further thought on this, I'd guess that 50% of a reserve component unit is prior service anyways. Kind if a moot point...
SSG (Join to see)
At this point that's probably accurate. Question still stands. That's only half. And we all know it only takes one
(0)
(0)

Suspended Profile
It's always been that way. I got in in '90 and it was about a 50/50 split.
Only one to do what? I've seen as many poor performing AD as I have RC. They both go to the same Basic and AIT to the net-net is the same. I really don't get your point. Are you implying that AD is "superior" to RC? Seems to me you need a little more time on both sides.
Only one to do what? I've seen as many poor performing AD as I have RC. They both go to the same Basic and AIT to the net-net is the same. I really don't get your point. Are you implying that AD is "superior" to RC? Seems to me you need a little more time on both sides.
Read This Next