Posted on Oct 30, 2015
U.S. to send dozens of special forces to Syria as advisors. Your thoughts?
17.1K
113
44
9
9
0
The United States will deploy dozens of special operations troops to northern Syria from next month to advise opposition forces in their fight against Islamic State, a major policy shift for President Barack Obama and a step he has long resisted to avoid getting dragged into another war in the Middle East.
The planned deployment, along with the U.S. decision this week to include Iran in diplomatic efforts to end the conflict, represents the biggest change in the United States' Syria policy since it began a bombing campaign against Islamic State targets there in September 2014.
Announcing the measure on Friday, the White House said the troops would be on a mission to "train, advise and assist" and would number fewer than 50. Spokesman Josh Earnest declined to give details about their exact role.
The decision by Obama, deeply averse to committing troops to unpopular wars in the Middle East, would mark the first sustained U.S. troop presence in Syria and raise the risk of American casualties, although U.S. officials stressed the forces were not meant to engage in front-line combat.
"This is a dangerous place on the globe and they are at risk, and there's no denying that," said Earnest, who repeatedly rejected the idea that the deployment would constitute a ground combat mission, which Obama has long rejected as a solution in Syria.
Earnest said the new mission in Syria was open ended and did not rule out the possibility of sending additional special forces troops into Iraq. Obama spoke to Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi on Friday about the fight against Islamic State, Earnest said.
The Obama administration is under pressure to ramp up America's effort against Islamic State, particularly after the militant group captured the Iraqi city of Ramadi in May and following the failure of a U.S. military program to train and arm thousands of Syrian rebels.
The planned deployment adds to an increasingly volatile conflict in Syria, where Russia and Iran have increased up their military support for President Bashar al-Assad's fight against rebels in the four-and-a-half year civil war.
Russia said when it began air strikes last month that it would also target the Islamic State militant group, but its planes have hit other rebel groups opposed to Assad, including groups backed by Washington.
The decision to send U.S. special forces to Syria will put U.S. forces "in harm's way," U.S. Defense Secretary Ash Carter said on Friday, adding he did not rule out the possibility of further special forces deployments to Syria.
This month a U.S. soldier was killed in Iraq participating in a Kurdish-led mission to rescue Islamic State hostages.
He we go again , they are calling the Troops "Advisers." Where have we heard that before?
The planned deployment, along with the U.S. decision this week to include Iran in diplomatic efforts to end the conflict, represents the biggest change in the United States' Syria policy since it began a bombing campaign against Islamic State targets there in September 2014.
Announcing the measure on Friday, the White House said the troops would be on a mission to "train, advise and assist" and would number fewer than 50. Spokesman Josh Earnest declined to give details about their exact role.
The decision by Obama, deeply averse to committing troops to unpopular wars in the Middle East, would mark the first sustained U.S. troop presence in Syria and raise the risk of American casualties, although U.S. officials stressed the forces were not meant to engage in front-line combat.
"This is a dangerous place on the globe and they are at risk, and there's no denying that," said Earnest, who repeatedly rejected the idea that the deployment would constitute a ground combat mission, which Obama has long rejected as a solution in Syria.
Earnest said the new mission in Syria was open ended and did not rule out the possibility of sending additional special forces troops into Iraq. Obama spoke to Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi on Friday about the fight against Islamic State, Earnest said.
The Obama administration is under pressure to ramp up America's effort against Islamic State, particularly after the militant group captured the Iraqi city of Ramadi in May and following the failure of a U.S. military program to train and arm thousands of Syrian rebels.
The planned deployment adds to an increasingly volatile conflict in Syria, where Russia and Iran have increased up their military support for President Bashar al-Assad's fight against rebels in the four-and-a-half year civil war.
Russia said when it began air strikes last month that it would also target the Islamic State militant group, but its planes have hit other rebel groups opposed to Assad, including groups backed by Washington.
The decision to send U.S. special forces to Syria will put U.S. forces "in harm's way," U.S. Defense Secretary Ash Carter said on Friday, adding he did not rule out the possibility of further special forces deployments to Syria.
This month a U.S. soldier was killed in Iraq participating in a Kurdish-led mission to rescue Islamic State hostages.
He we go again , they are calling the Troops "Advisers." Where have we heard that before?
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 26
Sgt David G Duchesneau - Sergeant; It wouldn't have been so bad if ALL they had done was disclose plans to send some Special Forces troops to Syria - after all ISIS would know that they were there within hours of their actual arrival.
The BIGGER problem is that they also disclosed what the Pentagon was planning to do in the future.
I don't really expect that the media will fully understand the concept of OpSec, but I DO expect that military "leaders" will.
http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2015/10/28/pentagon-outlines-its-3-rs-islamic-state-strategy?int=96e208
The BIGGER problem is that they also disclosed what the Pentagon was planning to do in the future.
I don't really expect that the media will fully understand the concept of OpSec, but I DO expect that military "leaders" will.
http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2015/10/28/pentagon-outlines-its-3-rs-islamic-state-strategy?int=96e208
(1)
(0)
This is an international statement, which I'm surprised it took this long. Some ways I can see why it did, but now, I'm afraid of what this will drag on to be.
(1)
(0)
I think I have been stating from long ago that this is the best course of action against these thugs and losers. They are no competition against fully trained Special Forces troops weather they are trainers, advisors, or fighters. We need to surgically eliminate these bums from the planet without a full military commitment to anyone.
(1)
(0)
SPC Nathan Freeman
I don't volunteer for martyr duty which is what this is. You can't win a war with advisors
(2)
(0)
Sgt David G Duchesneau Question? Will the ROEs be in a clear gaseous state in a glass bottle that no one can see or comprehend?
(1)
(0)
Drones In Syria 'Serving Strictly In An Advisory Role'
"Do you expect us to talk?" "No, Mr. ISIS, we expect you to die!"
(0)
(0)
50 well trained and supported operators can make a real difference. 50 well trained and isolated operators become dead bodies quickly. Which will it be? Under Obama, I fear the latter. Why not take a heavily support brigade sized element and go kill the bastards and keep killing them until ISIS is a word no one will say? We now have us supporting rebels to Assad, the Soviets bombing the rebels we support. ISIS owning 1/3 of Iraq and a piece of Syria (which the Russians [my age is showing by first calling them Soviets - but hey a duck by any other name is still a duck.....]are not bombing). Assad killing boat loads of civilians every week. Tens of thousands of muslims invading Europe. Now that ISIS has established it's Caliphate - we have a nation/state to declare war on in congress and then just go do what we do best - kill the bastards - all of them. Then stand back up Iraq - and patrol the streets like we did for over 20 years in Germany after WWII. Finally yes, take their damn oil to pay for the whole shooting match, once the bill is paid they can have it back.
The idea that some how we lack the ability to subdue Assad, ISIS and the other muslim nut-jobs is a kin to saying that we didn't stand a chance against the unholy alliance of Germany, Japan and Italy.....well, I suppose if you try and fight a limited engagement at Omaha and Iwo Jima, one where your first goal is to limit civilian casualties rather than kicking the other guys ass - you might be right. But, roll over them like the pieces of human debris that ANYONE supporting ISIS is and it's very, very doable. Back to the 50 operators - God Bless and Keep Them, for our president will assuredly not.
The idea that some how we lack the ability to subdue Assad, ISIS and the other muslim nut-jobs is a kin to saying that we didn't stand a chance against the unholy alliance of Germany, Japan and Italy.....well, I suppose if you try and fight a limited engagement at Omaha and Iwo Jima, one where your first goal is to limit civilian casualties rather than kicking the other guys ass - you might be right. But, roll over them like the pieces of human debris that ANYONE supporting ISIS is and it's very, very doable. Back to the 50 operators - God Bless and Keep Them, for our president will assuredly not.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next


Military Advisor
War on Terror
