Posted on Oct 12, 2015
CPO Andy Carrillo, MS
4.46K
22
17
4
4
0
00f4992a
A Marine Corps base in Hawaii has decided to keep a controversial “God bless the military” sign that has riled some activists in recent weeks, saying that the placard serves as a “secular symbol.”
The Military Religious Freedom Foundation complained late last month that the sign at Marine Corps Base Hawaii in Kaneohe Bay, Hawaii, was inappropriate and should be moved to the base chapel, but a commander has declined that request.
Commander Col. Sean C. Killeen sent a letter on Friday to the Military Religious Freedom Foundation, explaining that the sign — which reads in full, “God bless the military, their families and the civilians who work with them” — will not be taken down.
“This sign will remain in its present location and not be altered in any way,” the commander wrote.
Killeen said that, following an intense legal review, it was determined that the sign is secular and does not represent a sectarian stance, the Associated Press reported.
Posted in these groups: World religions 2 ReligionFreedom Freedom
Avatar feed
Responses: 8
SFC Mark Merino
7
7
0
Ever notice EVERYONE is cool with In God We Trust on their money?
(7)
Comment
(0)
CPO Andy Carrillo, MS
CPO Andy Carrillo, MS
>1 y
Yes, and those are not cool with that motto can send their non-1st Amendment compliant money to me and I will dispose of it, for free...
(1)
Reply
(0)
SSgt Terry P.
SSgt Terry P.
>1 y
SFC Mark Merino Funny how that works,huh?
(0)
Reply
(0)
Maj Matt Hylton
Maj Matt Hylton
>1 y
I wouldn't exactly say everyone is "cool" with it. I don't like that it is on my money, but I have no other choice but to use it. I do support it's removal from our money and as a motto. Our motto should still officially be E Pluribus Unum (which if you didn't realize, is printed on all coins, but not bills).
(0)
Reply
(0)
Sgt Aaron Kennedy, MS
Sgt Aaron Kennedy, MS
>1 y
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CSM Michael J. Uhlig
4
4
0
I am sure we will see a good commander "moved" if it is determined to be a bad call by the higher HQs.....I agree with his call - especially after a thorough legal review.
(4)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
LCpl Mark Lefler
2
2
0
As an atheist I have no issue with this sign, yeah don't care, it holds no true importance to anything. The issue i have is "religious freedom".. freedom for who? Christians? what about the rest of us.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Cpl Software Engineer
Cpl (Join to see)
>1 y
No one says you can't practice your own religious beliefs and I did say "your religious beliefs." There wouldn't be a Church of Atheism if it wasn't a secular belief. It would be dishonest for me to say you didn't have a devoted belief in atheism.

re·li·gious
rəˈlijəs/
antonyms: secular
treated or regarded with a devotion and scrupulousness appropriate to worship.
"I have a religious aversion to reading manuals"
synonyms: scrupulous, conscientious, meticulous, sedulous, punctilious, strict, rigorous, close
"religious attention to detail"

http://firstchurchofatheism.com/
(0)
Reply
(0)
LCpl Mark Lefler
LCpl Mark Lefler
>1 y
Cpl (Join to see) - i wasn't saying you personally said anything, I was making a general statement about "religious liberty" nothing to do with anything you specifically said.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Cpl Software Engineer
Cpl (Join to see)
>1 y
I actually commend you on your restraint. I consider myself an agnostic atheist at best and seeing religious artifacts affects me in no way. There are still those on this site who have a vampiric aversion to all things Christian.
(0)
Reply
(0)
LCpl Mark Lefler
LCpl Mark Lefler
>1 y
Cpl (Join to see) - i dont have a problem with christian expressionism, I just have a problem with christians acting like they're the only good deal in town.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close