Posted on Jan 28, 2014
Veteran, Retired, Retired Veteran who cares? You should still respect others rank, right?
21.3K
156
74
12
12
0
...still respect others rank, right?<div><br></div><div>I have noticed that on many occasions SM no longer serving are extremely disrespectful to those senior in rank, on social media.<div><br></div><div> While they are not bound anymore by UCMJ, do you believe that respect should be given to seniors still serving even after your military service is finished?<br></div><div><br></div><div>Do you feel if a member of rally point can not conduct themselves in a professional manner in regards to rank structure or any other form of disrespect, even as retired or veteran, they should be barred from the site?</div></div>
Posted 12 y ago
Responses: 27
Respect begets respect. That's the law on the street, and it should apply here. I joined Rally Point because I often have something to contribute, funny or not. I no more right to disrespect anyone than you do, regardless of the rank we are holding or have held (veterans and retirees). This is a professional site and we should act accordingly. We are all brothers/sisters-in-arms and there is no reason at all to show animosity towards one another, in any form.
(1)
(0)
Suspended Profile
I find it hilarious that I'm reading this forum post. This is the exact reason why I have limited my activity on RallyPoint for the past few weeks. Yes, I absolutely, 100 percent agree that all personnel with an account on this site should still respect others who have surpassed them in rank regardless if they're still serving. I have actually ran into this issue a few weeks back in which a SM completely disrespected me in which the sad part is, she wasn't even an NCO. Wow! I get that many military members have separated and still maintain ill feelings towards those of higher ranks post-separation but coming on a site with nothing but service members is NOT the forum to vent or direct your frustrations to other members. It's extremely uncalled for and honestly should be restricted from having an account. Not once have I ever disrespected someone intentionally or not without consequence. It should be the same for these individuals. I'm pretty sure that every military branch has "respect" in their respective core values in which you should still live by regardless if you are currently serving. Anyway, just my opinion.....everyone has one
SPC (Join to see)
SSG while I think that you are correct in stating that is a poorly chosen location to vent one's anger on all things military I would rather keep it in house. I would hate for civilians to see it on facebook or twitter and think that it is the norm for a SM to talk to another SM that way. We don't need to have our dirty laundry aired out to the public.
(0)
(1)
Suspended Profile
PFC Mullins, that's not what I'm saying. Sure you can vent in the form of asking advice and/or seeking counsel. However, venting your frustrations and directing your anger towards members on this site just because "you can" due to the fact that you're a civilian is BS plain and simple. I'm all for military members using this forum to express their feelings towards certain aspects of the military because quite frankly, we are not perfect. However, one must remain respectful at all times and very much so professional.
SPC (Join to see)
SSG, that was failed communication on my part and I apologize for sending the wrong message. It is healthy to vent but to do so in a negative fashion towards others is wrong. That was what I intended to say. I'm in full agreement with you, SSG.
(1)
(0)
Yes, but social media gives some a forum to air their grievances about their time in service. There are ways to state one opinions while still being respectful. Golden Rule applies.
(0)
(0)
Once you are a veteran, I think the appropriate term, rather than rank, might be “Brother.”
When in the service, it was required to acquiesce and defer to a rank structure; hence the “rank structure.”
Once someone retired or is out of the service, the deference to rank no longer applies and equality then becomes the norm. Now, old titles of affection like “Skipper” or “Top” are exceptions, it is my opinion, that the appropriate term after service would be “Brother.”
As an afterthought, you never know what someone has worked hard to become since your days together in the military. I am a Combat Marine Sergeant of Artillery. Now, I certainly do not mind being addressed as sergeant, but I like the title I earned after the Corps and I described me today rather than who I was 30 years ago: Doctor
When in the service, it was required to acquiesce and defer to a rank structure; hence the “rank structure.”
Once someone retired or is out of the service, the deference to rank no longer applies and equality then becomes the norm. Now, old titles of affection like “Skipper” or “Top” are exceptions, it is my opinion, that the appropriate term after service would be “Brother.”
As an afterthought, you never know what someone has worked hard to become since your days together in the military. I am a Combat Marine Sergeant of Artillery. Now, I certainly do not mind being addressed as sergeant, but I like the title I earned after the Corps and I described me today rather than who I was 30 years ago: Doctor
(0)
(0)
I agree as long as you aren't saying that it's disrespectful to disagree with someone who holds a higher rank. It wouldn't be much of a forum then, would it?
With regard to maintaining proper decorum, yes, absolutely. It's a Military Forum and should be treated as such. Barring from the site would be a little much, except in the most extreme and repeated circumstances....for the most part, if someone is crossing lines, I think having some peer pressure applied would do the trick....after all, if we were all active duty, calling out a peer who was toeing the line with a senior would work (generally).
With regard to maintaining proper decorum, yes, absolutely. It's a Military Forum and should be treated as such. Barring from the site would be a little much, except in the most extreme and repeated circumstances....for the most part, if someone is crossing lines, I think having some peer pressure applied would do the trick....after all, if we were all active duty, calling out a peer who was toeing the line with a senior would work (generally).
(0)
(0)
SGT Blackburn,
A little unrelated to your post (but not completely off topic).
As far as the Terms and Conditions are concerned, this is a specific section:
"7.2 You shall not submit, post, upload to, distribute through or otherwise use in connection with the Services any User Content that:
(a) Is libelous, vulgar, defamatory, threatening, abusive, scandalous, obscene, pornographic or unlawful or that encourages a criminal offense;"
Some of this can obviously be very subjective.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Professionalism
Customs and Courtesies
