Posted on Jan 28, 2014
SGT Cda 564, Assistant Team Sergeant
21.3K
156
74
12
12
0
...still respect others rank, right?<div><br></div><div>I have noticed that on many occasions SM no longer serving are extremely disrespectful to those senior in rank, on social media.<div><br></div><div>&nbsp;While they are not bound anymore by UCMJ, do you believe that respect should be given to seniors still serving even after your military service is finished?<br></div><div><br></div><div>Do you feel if a member of rally point can not conduct themselves in a professional manner in regards to rank structure or any other form of disrespect, even as retired or veteran, they should be barred from the site?</div></div>
Avatar feed
Responses: 27
SFC Michael Hasbun
14
14
0
<p>I'll phrase my response this way; those who&nbsp;are deserving of&nbsp;respect should always be afforded it, regardless of rank or status.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Read that how you will...</p>
(14)
Comment
(0)
SFC Michael Hasbun
SFC Michael Hasbun
12 y
I've always felt that if an individual just isn't worthy of respect, no cloth on their chest is going to change that. It's up to each of us individually to be worthy of our ranks. The ranks themselves don't magically imbue us with knowledge, intelligence, character, or wisdom. Only we can bring that to the table. You're either worth respecting, or you're not. Rank or status has nothing to do with it. I know SPC's with more worth than some 1SG's.. It's all about the person..
(6)
Reply
(0)
SFC James Baber
SFC James Baber
12 y
100% on point.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SFC Michael Hasbun
SFC Michael Hasbun
12 y
I try my best...
(0)
Reply
(0)
MSgt Electrical Power Production
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
1SG Johnny Carter
13
13
0
Edited 12 y ago
I don't feel they should be banned, I mean this is a social media and yes there are former Soldiers who for whatever reason chose not to serve anymore or retired ( by retired I mean with 20 plus years. ) act a fool on here because they fear no reprisal. I do feel that respect is something earned not given. If these so called former Soldiers are disrespectful then just plain ignore then or just plain hit that DELETE button. Becasue regardless we as professionals should alwasy travel the higher ground. Some of the people get their kicks off being disrespectful because that's all they know in life. At the end of the day some snot nosed former SPC is not worth the time or effort. My momma always said to me " BOY IF YOU HAVE NOTHING NICE TO SAY KEEP YOUR MOUTH SHUT OR ELSE!!! " Love my momma!
(13)
Comment
(0)
MSgt Electrical Power Production
MSgt (Join to see)
>1 y
Very well put 1SG Johnny Carter even momma would be proud!
(0)
Reply
(0)
SSG Senior Supply Sergeant
SSG (Join to see)
10 y
1SG my Mom us to tell about the same but the Else go before....
(0)
Reply
(0)
SSG Charles Holleran
SSG Charles Holleran
10 y
I am a 55 year old retired Army SSG who whenever I can will shake the hand of WWII veterans and will sometimes go out of my way to say a good word to anyone who I can recognize as a vetern or active duty service man or woman.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SGT Peter Wilks
SGT Peter Wilks
>1 y
Well said Top!
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
LTC Executive Officer To Afc A Co S G 3/5/7
10
10
0
I've noticed a few posts that have made me scratch my head and wonder "What were they thinking when they wrote that, in that manner?".<div><br></div><div>While no longer bound by UCMJ - one would think that since they are on a professional forum…they would remain, well…professional. &nbsp;Disagreement is not disrespect…however, stating outright that "I'm not in anymore, so I can say what I want and you can't do a thing about it" leads me to believe that the individual had a bad experience in the military…or are disgruntled, with a chip on their shoulder.</div><div><br></div><div>No reason in the world to get personal, behave in an unprofessional manner, become hostile or anything else on here. &nbsp;Some folks don't take constructive criticism well and automatically become defensive. &nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div><br></div>
(10)
Comment
(0)
SGT Cda 564, Assistant Team Sergeant
SGT (Join to see)
12 y
Agree, it just seems to me that it is more often than not service members that are no longer serving. While any and all opinions, no matter your status, are encouraged (one thing that makes this site so unique) one should always conduct themselves as a professional. I have seen on occasion where the soldier (E4 talking to E7) point blank said I may have been a SPC then but im a civilian now &nbsp;rank no longer matters.&nbsp;<div><br></div><div>The other one that gets me is E4 or E5 veteran who uses their spouses current rank (E7-E8) in an argument. Well my E8 husband outranks you so you should respect me?!?! Do they not know that their spouse can still receive negative repercussions for their actions? Just plain unprofessional.</div>
(3)
Reply
(0)
1SG David Niles
1SG David Niles
7 y
Makes me wonder why they would join a forum such as this then
(1)
Reply
(0)
GySgt Mike Swisher
GySgt Mike Swisher
>1 y
1SG David Niles just thinking the same, if you come to these forums with "baggage" from your service, why come at all. This is the place to come and share those values that we as professionals all have in common, and carry with us into the private sector, including respect for what our peers have earned through their service, such as rank. Tradition, respect, and honoring what someone has earned through hard work is important.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Avatar feed
Veteran, Retired, Retired Veteran who cares? You should still respect others rank, right?
MAJ Joseph Parker
6
6
0

Interesting discussion on this thread! Would like to add a couple of cents here.


(1) Firstly, all RETIRED military personnel are subject to UCMJ. This is a fact. All of us "R" RPers are still in the service, but just on the retired rolls. When we are buried, our ranks will be on our tombstones. Until then, the President of the United States, the Congress, The Secretary of Defense, and the people of this nation who reposed special trust in our valor, fidelity, etc. expect us to conduct ourselves as leaders, soldiers, sailors, airmen, and professionals. I expect every active duty SM on this site below my grade to treat me and others appropriately, and I treat them as if they were in my unit and give them the respect, loyalty, and leadership required of me by my superiors and the President, just like it says on my DD1 and the UCMJ and just like I swore to do for the very first time on June 4, 1971. Doing this from the retired roles isn't a big burden, so there is absolutely no excuse for not doing with full measure. 


(2) Veterans who are not on the retired roles generally have little jurisdiction under the UCMJ. How they conduct themselves as Honorably Discharged Veterans is really up to them. Actually, most veterans are quite honorable, including the ones on this site. They offer respect to rank, and receive it back 98% of the time.


(3) This site does have Terms of Use. We as military personnel (Active, retired, and veteran) have professional ethos. Finally, as Americans and human beings, we all have common courtesy and human failings.


(4) It's easy to forget rank on this site. People get a little heated or sloppy on posts. Most of the time a gentle nudge in the way of friendly counseling response will fix it. No need to get ugly among professionals. When friendly, professional messages don't get through, a nudge to the site owners will usually fix the problem. It is, after all, their turf.


(5) Lastly; Yes, there are some rather bizarre comments and downright insolent posts that occur. That is going to happen with 100,000 plus members. We all learn from those, too! Respect is not only legislated, badged (like on RP), but also earned. Who gets more respect from you: A General or an E-4 with the MOH? Who does a General respect more: the SecDef or the E-4 with the MOH?



(6)
Comment
(0)
1SG David Niles
1SG David Niles
10 y
I disagree Maj Parker, most are our brothers and sisters, but some do not, did not live and accept the ethos. This includes officer or enlisted. The wearing of the uniform does not automatically get that title of brother or sister. Some dishonor that right, with or without their being caught. But for those with honor, I dare to call you brother
(1)
Reply
(0)
MAJ Joseph Parker
MAJ Joseph Parker
10 y
Roger, 1SGT. I hear you 5 by 5 and understand. I personally sent a number of less than exemplary soldiers to Leavenworth or to the World with a "less than honorable" ticket home, but only when they deserved it and worked hard for it over the labor of a lot of good leadership. However, I also remembered a leadership lesson once told me by General Richard Cavazos, a fellow Infantryman and airborne ranger when he commanded the 9th Infantry Division. He reflected about his days as a combat platoon leader in the Korean War, and two dirt-bag, scum-bucket troops he had that were of more value to the enemy than his unit. You know the type. He did everything in his power to get them kicked out of the Army, and this was in the middle of a war! Then one night all the Chinese in the world attacked the hill his platoon occupied, and young LT Cavazos lay badly wounded as the rest of his platoon was driven down the reverse slope. As he lay there cold, shivering, his life seeping away into the Korean dirt and Chinese troops around him bayoneting the nearby American dead; those same 2 dirt-bags suddenly came charging up the hill, throwing grenades and shooting like crazy men. Fighting like fools, the 2 scum-bucket privates beat back the Chinese, picked up their LT, and carried him back down the hill, still shooting and killing anything that wasn't GI. General Cavazos was a bit misty eyed retelling that story, but he looked up and said that a leader's job was to make the best of EVERY soldier, no matter how hopeless. Then he laughed and said that he still thought those two yard-birds were the worst soldiers ever, but they helped make him a better officer...or at least a still-breathing officer! End of true but boring story.
(1)
Reply
(0)
1SG David Niles
1SG David Niles
10 y
Not boring, good food for thought!
(0)
Reply
(0)
1SG David Niles
1SG David Niles
7 y
Grey area retirees are not subject to the UCMJ
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Stephen P.
6
6
0
Say we have a veteran who separated as a specialist back in `95. Now he is the CEO of a small company that employs 1000 people. Something tells me that he isn't going to be all that impressed with my E7ness. <br><br>Perhaps we could instead remove rank from veterans altogether? <br>
(6)
Comment
(0)
SFC Counterintelligence (CI) Agent
SFC (Join to see)
12 y
Stellar idea SFC Pate!  Veterans normally bring other qualities and attributes to OUR forum and as your example points out, they shouldn't be pigeonholed by their military rank only. 
(2)
Reply
(0)
SFC Mark Merino
SFC Mark Merino
>1 y
SFC Stephen P. Me thinks you are on to something there, big daddy SFC!
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CPT George Raileanu
4
4
0
Edited 12 y ago

SGT Blackburn,


I don't want to get too philosophical, but acting professional (AKA respecting the rank) because of UCMJ is not the same as respecting the individual (which I believe is more important). I respect soldiers for their commitment to serve. I respect NCOs/CW because I realize that they are more experienced than myself. I respect commanders because I understand their level of responsibility. I respect Veterans for their time in service. I respect civilians for their support. Personally, I have respect for myself and therefore hold myself accountable to certain standards. However, I have a much higher level of respect (regardless of rank or military status) for individuals that not only have a similar level of self-respect, but also respect myself and others because of the relationship. So to answer your question, I believe disrespect should not be tolerated not because of rank/status, but because it is wrong.

(4)
Comment
(0)
CPT George Raileanu
CPT George Raileanu
12 y
PFC Mullins, I believe you already answered the question yourself. I think self-respect allows people to remain professional. As far as what to do when it comes to dealing with a superior that cannot maintain the same level of professionalism for one reason or another, I would say continue to act as a professional to the best of your abilities as not to compromise the Army (or sister branches) Values. Unfortunately, I do not think there is a "universal" answer because of the complexity of the problem/situation. However, I believe by living the Army (or sister branches) Values, you cannot go wrong. As far as the reason you "respect" your toxic superior can become a very philosophical discussion because the mere definition of the word "respect" is not finite (in my opinion). LOL I hope I'm making some sense :)
(2)
Reply
(0)
SSgt Forensic Meteorological Consultant
SSgt (Join to see)
12 y
LT George R. - Now I am getting older because you look so young but at the same time you stated this perfectly.   Nuance can greatly complicate everything.
(0)
Reply
(0)
CPT George Raileanu
CPT George Raileanu
12 y

SSgt Olsen,

Thank you, but if you enjoy philosophy, I always like to say that time (age) is just relative. LOL

(1)
Reply
(0)
SPC Squad Member
SPC (Join to see)
12 y
Sir, you did a fine job in communicating your response! Thank you for your input.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSgt Forensic Meteorological Consultant
4
4
0

Sometimes people can be petty or have a bad day or two but that is no excuse to be rude.   No one here is as elite as they fancy themselves to be,   and respect is a two-way street.


There are a few senior posters here who go out of their way to follow the golden rule and that should be the norm.


As an aside we have Veterans passing every day and I will try  to list as many as I can.  This is just another way we can remember those who went before us.  These reports come from the Patriot Guard.   The thing to remember it will be us one day that will pass.

(4)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
PO3 Account Management Specialist
4
4
0
Respect goes both ways though. I too have thought, "why did that person say that thing in that manner?" and they are supposed to be of higher rank, and show professionalism and leadership. If you're of higher rank than me, and you're being a dick, for lack of a professional term, shame on you. That doesn't mean that I should come back and be a brat about it, but it's incredibly frustrating to see many military members who don't offer respect too.
(4)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Laureano Pabon
3
3
0

SGT B. thumbs up for your thread.

When I was a young man in intermediate school, (NYC IS 117) we had an Air Force Tech SGT come to the school to talk to us about the Air Force. A few students were rather disrespectful to what he had to say (Racially). What happened was the SGT stopped Standing in front of the auditorium and said : "If you don't have any respect for someone's nationality or race, then you have no respect for your self". 

Personally I took that for myself and made it a part of me personally. While the racial topic is not part of this thread, I still feel its the same when some one disrespects a SM whom is active duty serving and a Veteran. I do find that if a member is disrespectful to any member in RP, well they are just disrespectful. How RP elects to handle that is really up to RP. But personally I have found such actions in threads that I might have posted, but I made no big deal over it, because while a thread is not me, I personally don't allow such actions to phase me as a veteran. Now as a Veteran, I can still have UCMJ actions applied to me. I can still get court martial even though I'm not in the military. Which is why my I don't talk about my MOS much or what I did in the military.

This is a briefing that I was given when I was discharge. perhaps not in article 86 but yes I can still qualify for a court-martial.

Social media I only have about 3 or 4 Veterans and 1 SM, respect is very high there.

(3)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SPC Adam W.
3
3
0
Some people will always have attitude/respect problems.  That goes for currently serving, vets, and everyone else.  But being banned for disregarding rank structure on this webpage is pretty ludicrous though.  I'm all for it if it comes down to a violation of RP's rules, obscenity, etc.  But I did not sign up for RP to "rejoin."  But don't misunderstand my lack of enthusiasm of strictly maintaining rank structure for disrespect.  I would afford anyone here the same respect and professionalism as I would expect to receive, until shown otherwise.
(3)
Comment
(0)
PO3 Account Management Specialist
PO3 (Join to see)
12 y
"But being banned for disregarding rank structure on this webpage is pretty ludicrous though. I'm all for it if it comes down to a violation of RP's rules, obscenity, etc. But I did not sign up for RP to "rejoin.""

***slow clap*** well said.
(3)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close