Posted on Jul 31, 2015
Capt Richard I P.
11.4K
80
24
9
9
0
Edited >1 y ago
Avatar feed
See Results
Responses: 13
CPT Jack Durish
5
5
0
Sadly, given current American leadership... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KAp9sFVdERQ
(5)
Comment
(0)
SFC Mark Merino
SFC Mark Merino
>1 y
RUN AWAAAAYYY!!!
(2)
Reply
(0)
PO2 Steven Erickson
PO2 Steven Erickson
>1 y
F37a040a
CPT Jack Durish, we MUST deploy the Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch!

("Skip a bit, brother...")
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
LTC Yinon Weiss
5
5
0
I would like to say that we would respond with strength no matter what, but I think it's actually more likely to depend on which NATO member, and which conditions Putin was able to manipulate to justify the actions.
(5)
Comment
(0)
LTC Paul Labrador
LTC Paul Labrador
>1 y
I think that the Eastern NATO nations will take it seriously. After all, they've experienced Russian occupation first hand, and didn't like it. But I really have no faith in some of the western NATO nations. They've grown fat and happy living under the protection of the US, and have lost the fire in the belly to defend themselves.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Capt Richard I P.
Capt Richard I P.
>1 y
I think the article does a really good job of describing a way through brinksmanship and hybrid warfare Putin could dislodge peripheral NATO countries, undermining its overall value.
(0)
Reply
(0)
LTC Stephen Conway
LTC Stephen Conway
>1 y
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
LTC Stephen C.
4
4
0
Capt Richard I P., I would like to think that NATO would respond in a forceful manner. Frankly, I think it would be an imperative. NATO would look to the U.S. for leadership, and I would hope that we would respond forcefully as well; another imperative. I'm not sure the current administration would be so inclined. Number one.
(4)
Comment
(0)
Capt Richard I P.
Capt Richard I P.
>1 y
LTC Stephen C., Sir, I'm not sure responding forcefully is in in the National best interest. I myself fall into other 'nuclear war is really scary' camp. Violence should be a last result both in interpersonal and international relations, and potential extinction-event inducing violence should be the lastest of results, as I see it.
(1)
Reply
(0)
LTC Stephen C.
LTC Stephen C.
>1 y
Capt Richard I P., I agree that bringing world to the brink of WWIII is not the goal and that nuclear war is not the solution. Perhaps "forceful" is too strong a word, and perhaps "respond with strength" as expressed by LTC Yinon Weiss is more appropriate. However, some significant response would be required, as doing nothing would be perceived by Putin as weakness.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Avatar feed
What if Russia attacks a NATO member?
See Results
TSgt Joshua Copeland
2
2
0
If we look at recent history with Russia and the UN...#3 all day long.
(2)
Comment
(0)
MAJ Contracting Officer
MAJ (Join to see)
>1 y
So sad, but true.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CW5 Desk Officer
2
2
0
NATO might be reluctant to answer, but I hope the USA will stand up for and do what's right. I voted #1 (Game ON!), with #4 (Russia won't do it ...) a close second in my mind.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Capt Richard I P.
Capt Richard I P.
>1 y
CW5 (Join to see) I find myself pulling hard in the hope department for #4.
(1)
Reply
(0)
LTC Stephen Conway
LTC Stephen Conway
>1 y
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
LTC Stephen F.
1
1
0
Capt Richard I P., the appropriate response by NATO members including the USA depends on the type of attack, extent of the attack, provocation or lack of provocation, what else is at risk within the region, and the available options.
WWI was started because alliances formed in which obligated nations to respond to attacks on fellow members - an assassination in Serbia initiated the chain of events which became WWI.
The move to bring in many of the former east European nations, which were behind the former iron curtain, to NATO membership has taken away the buffer between NATO and Russia. Russia has been attacked several times from western Europe from Napoleonic times through WWII. Russia has a reasonable expectation that the West wants to limits its power and influence in the Baltic republics which include many ethnic Russians as well is the the former Soviet Republics which border the Black Sea.
If Russia is directly attacking a member state, NATO should respond in kind but not escalate the warfare if feasible. Non-military means should also be used to the greatest extent including embargoes, freezing of assets as appropriate, pressuring of non-NATO allies to support the effort, etc.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Mark Merino
1
1
0
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
MSG Intermediate Care Technician
1
1
0
I am certain, that NATO would look Russia dead in the eyes and say..."Tsk Tsk. Why did you go and do that?" All the while shaking the index finger at Russia
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CDR Terry Boles
1
1
0
Lack of clearly defined response with a not so assured backing. Putin plays a great game of chess. Worrisome!
(1)
Comment
(0)
Capt Richard I P.
Capt Richard I P.
>1 y
The man is reminiscent of the powerful Russian leaders of old. Ivan, Stalin, Peter, isn't he?
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
LTC Joseph Gross
0
0
0
We have already seen how NATO and the US under current leadership supports our Allies. We ignored our obligation to Ukraine and to Georgia. We spent three days discussing how to word our stern letter to Russia after they invaded Ukraine.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close