Posted on Aug 16, 2017
CPL Metal Worker
106K
1.18K
358
193
193
0
Apologies for my terrible English. Here is the question broken down and explained in what I hope is in better terms.
The situation is that a soldier was given a false pt score by a previous NCO for whatever reasons that he had. The soldier has now changed duty stations and was promoted to Sgt rank. She has not been pinned yet but took a diagnostic pt test and failed the pt test. Now the question is being raised about her really having a 300 pt score and she is scared and has been scared to say anything about the changing of her records. My question is what can she do as for this to not effect her career in a negative way? Especially in light of her not declining the promotion. I do understand that myself knowing what is going on and not saying anything can put me in the same boat as her. I know the wrong answer is to not say anything but what's the best way to go about doing something if anything to minimize the amount of damage done to her or multiple people's careers?
Edited 8 y ago
Avatar feed
Responses: 244
Votes
  • Newest
  • Oldest
  • Votes
CW2 Counterintelligence Technician
208
208
0
CPL Santos,
I'm going to be very direct. Personally, and I don't care what her MOS is, I don't want a soldier who displays an utter lack of integrity in my Army. She had at least a couple of opportunities to fix this. 1. Either she didn't know the PT test was pencil-whipped or she did. If she didn't, as soon as she became aware of it, she should have cleared the air. If she did, she is disloyal, failed in her duty, failed to show respect to both the rank, the promotion board, and her leadership, is selfish, is dishonorable, lacks integrity and personal courage. 2. When she failed the PT test, she showed a gross lack of readiness, which is unsat in our Army, especially right now. She should have cleared the air then.

I'll be honest, I am a bit irritated at the fact that there is a soldier out there somewhere who is about to be promoted to become a leader of soldiers under these circumstance. I sincerely hope she is not in the 35 CMF.
(208)
Comment
(0)
CPL José A CastroPacheco
CPL José A CastroPacheco
6 y
Chief, I couldn't agree more with your words. How can we keep having the best trained armed forces in the world if our soldiers are lacking honesty and integrity and a lack of respect for the service and our nation? We need committed military personnel that believe in what our main mission is. We are the best armed forces and is for a reason. No one should be allowed to wear those stripes under false pretenses. She's no worthy of them.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SFC Drill Sergeant
SFC (Join to see)
6 y
Okay, is the soldier injured, and didn't say anything. I doubt someone would go that far and fudge a 300 PT card, and she didn't receive or come close. That is a far stretch. I don't think the solider is being fully truthful
(0)
Reply
(0)
SFC Ernest Thurston
SFC Ernest Thurston
>1 y
PO1 (Join to see) - It's been more than a few years since I made SGT but I remember sitting down with someone in PAC and going over my entire promotion packet as they made up the score computation sheet and I had to verify the information as we went through it. The only reason I can see that a 300 PT score got into her file without her knowledge would be that the PAC didn't get it into her packet that same day which is unlikely or they had to request one from her training NCO and he couldn't find a current test so he manufactured one on the fly. Either way, it's wrong.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SGT Jim Wiseman
SGT Jim Wiseman
5 y
I have to agree, Chief! When I was in and also close to the end, I saw many E-6 and up in support MOS's that were grossly and obviously overweight. They were allowed to slide and as 11B's we were constantly (and rightly) hounded about being in shape. Being a mechanic in an Infantry unit was cause for my HHC PSG to hound them about being able to keep up with the grunts. They didn't like it, but it was valid. After about 2 years and a combat injury involving my foot and reconstruction of it, I had a permanent running profile. That limited what I was able to do and seemed to baffle some NCO's on how to keep me doing good PT. Complicating that was the missing portion of my abs which made sit-ups more difficult and no profile for it to compensate. It's a blur how it happened, but I know I was able to pass a PT test to go to the Board. I always wanted to make good on those and not get pencil-whipped.
I remember during my last year and the unit I was in was testing for EIB. With my constant problems on PT tests, I voiced to a friend with his EIB that I would have like to earn mine before leaving the Army, but wasn't sure I could even pass the PT test. He said (being a grader), "Come to my line. I'll make sure you pass." I told him flat out that I wouldn't want to earn my EIB like that.
If a soldier didn't display ability anywhere near a 300 PT score, I'd question it. They are rare enough, but if I could see someone had fallen in their ability a little, I'd say we'd have to work on it, but likely it would be passing already. Out and out falsifying is different from even a slight pencil-whip. Wanting promotion and striving for it is commendable, but abandoning integrity altogether is unforgivable. Being female and probably not among the few now serving as Infantry, it is still no excuse to slack on PT. It hasn't done for an excuse among males in non-combat MOS's, and seeing as how (despite past recruiters' ploys to sign up the reluctant with promises) all MOS's can be deployed, combat readiness is a must!
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
1SG Civil Affairs Specialist
177
177
0
The Soldier is complicit in the forging of an official training record. She then allowed that record to be used to accept a promotion.
That violates the spirit and the letter of the entire first paragraph of the NCO Creed.
She has no business accepting a promotion based upon this.
Were she my Soldier, she'd be trundled down to the PT Track for an immediate record APFT. Regardless of score, the new one would be the basis for a recalculation in promotion points. She would be flagged until it hit the PPRL and I was sure that the new score was reflected there.

I wouldn't necessarily punish her for what had happened elsewhere, but I'd sure as hell counsel her. Her actions after she arrived in my unit would be scrutinized carefully. I don't know this Soldier, but she isn't getting off on the right foot.
I need NCOs with integrity, personal courage, and selfless service. This is not that. If she gets her head right - and apparently her fitness as well - then she can move out smartly and potentially lead others.
Until then, she needs to get her mind right.
(177)
Comment
(0)
SFC Don Ward
SFC Don Ward
6 y
Always told soldiers that worked for me - Nobody can take your integrity, you have to give it away. Pencil whipping PT tests, either way, is a breach of that integrity.
(3)
Reply
(0)
SGT David Tillotson
SGT David Tillotson
6 y
SSgt Greg Willard - A soldier is a soldier, whether Army, Air Force, Navy or Marine..
(0)
Reply
(0)
SSgt Greg Willard
SSgt Greg Willard
6 y
SGT David Tillotson: In your use of the title "soldier" you forgot the Coast Guard. If you're looking for a generic application you might try "Military Personnel". Just a thought.
(2)
Reply
(0)
SFC Ernest Thurston
SFC Ernest Thurston
>1 y
SSgt Greg Willard - Welcome to the fray Marine :-)
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Joseph Gunderson
103
103
0
Well, frankly, if you cannot for certain prove that it was falsified there isn't a whole lot that you can do. However, if the soldier fails a real OR test prior to being pinned she can be flagged and that will postpone any promotion. Fail another one and administrative action can be done to separate them. Frankly, they obviously don't have the integrity it takes to be a leader anyways. I would see that they take an APFT as soon as possible and flag them if they fail.
(103)
Comment
(0)
CPL Glynnda White
CPL Glynnda White
>1 y
That is an excellent response SGT Gunderson
(5)
Reply
(0)
SFC Brigade Operations Nocic
SFC (Join to see)
>1 y
First of all, this Soldier has to acknowledge the score immediately following the APFT. During the course this Soldiers career, the APFT scores leading up to the 300 should be an indicator of especially if the Soldier failed the following diagnostic APFT. Knowing that one shows a dramatic increase in score when the effort or performance was sub par demonstrates a severe lack in integrity, especially if the score would result in favorable promotion points to the rank of SGT. The Soldier has been in the Army for more than a day and acting like they are the victim and denying much knowledge is also a test to the credibility of this individual. The NCO who forged this document in the previous unit also needs to be investigated as well since they were in the leadership position and has displayed poor judgement. Read the NCO Creed about using one's grade to attain, pleasure, profit, or personal safety. This is the problem of public pressure trying to make Military Service the same as any 9-5 job and it in no way has any similarity. I am sorry, Military Service has restrictions and limitations and not EVERYONE can participate, don't dumb down the discipline to make this all inclusive, it only lessens the ability to keep this nation safe.
(4)
Reply
(0)
SFC Lee Massey
SFC Lee Massey
6 y
CPL, I would count the previous APFT score of 300 as old news. I can tell you that getting an official determination into weather this APFT was false will be hard for you. She very well may currently be out of shape and just failed the diagnostic. There are administrative actions that you must currently take that will provide you every opportunity to either get this Soldier back into mission ready status or prepare for separation. Have an offline conversation with the 1SG and get his or her guidance on this situation. Seeing that the 1SG should most likely be aware of this already. Really your PSG should already have a pretty solid plan of action that you should be following at this point.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SFC Ernest Thurston
SFC Ernest Thurston
6 y
SFC Lee Massey - Give her a new PT test for record three weeks after the failed diagnostic. If she can't get a 300 start the process to Chapter her out. Someone needs to do some serious counseling on the NCO that signed off on her 300 PT test.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Avatar feed
What is the most appropriate way to address someone being given a false PT score, while minimizing the damage to their career?
CSM William Payne
25
25
0
Edited 8 y ago
When I was attending the United States Army Sergeants Major Academy at Fort Bliss, we were "requested" by the command of Beaumont Army Hospital to conduct their APFT. Be careful for what you ask for. Many of the USASMA students that volunteered were combat arms and a large number of those were former drill sergeants. The many different violations of form and function of doing sit-ups and especially pushups were astounding. The hospital chief, a Colonel, was one of the worse when it came to doing pushups. After being told several times that his pushups were not meeting the standard, he finally quit and then blew his stack.

He said that he had never failed an APFT previously during his career and nobody had ever questioned his pushups before. Needless to say, there were a number of the military hospital staff that didn't do well on the APFT that day. I doubt that USASMA students were ever invited back to be graders again.

I did have knowledge of a CSM that was caught falsifying his APFT card, subsequently received a field grade Article 15 and retired. When members of leadership or the command team do their PT and take the APFT separately from the rest of the Solders, that's not a good sign.
(25)
Comment
(0)
CSM William Payne
CSM William Payne
>1 y
You are conflating two issues, not passing the APFT and / or not making height and weight into the same argument. I would much rather have a Soldier that was physically fit and a little over table weight than one that easily makes weight but is not physically fit.

If you serve in any military service you have a duty obligation to meet the standards of that service. That’s part of the “discipline” required for those that serve in the sister services and to be quite matter of fact, part of what you get paid to do.

Having said that, not sure there is a provision for this in the Navy, but in the Army, if you are over the weight standard for your height, you get taped.

If you are indeed a weight lifter and not a “pencil neck geek”, this will be accounted for in this test.

But no test is perfect and until there can be a substitute for the submersion test, the gold standard for body fat, we will just have to do the best we can.

At the Army Drill Sergeant Academy, we once body taped everyone just for S&G and found a number of “slender” Soldiers that failed tape. And I’ve seen my share of thin Soldiers that couldn’t pass the APFT.

Now the Army is rolling out a new test that supposedly will be a better indicator of physical fitness and will do away with the male / female scales.

But if the requirement for you to do a successful push-up to meet the standard is that break the plane of your elbow, than that’s what you need to do, sorry, going down a few inches and then back up, doesn’t cut it.

In the new test you must put your chest on the ground and lift your hands off the ground, a little tougher to compromise.
(3)
Reply
(0)
SPC Byron Skinner
SPC Byron Skinner
6 y
Sp4 Skinner…What's the big deal here, just giving back some of the crap the Drill Sargent gave out to Recruits for eight week.The pus— can't do a push up, how about the pull up bar for the line into the Mess Hall. Do one for each year of your age…no sympathy here for DI's…An 11B was to be fit, back in the day there was no official test..you Platoon Sgt. or Squad leader thinks you dogging' it let you carry the (23.5Lb.) M-60 and the 50 rounds in the belt. Do that for a week on one or two C Rats a day. Your fit, trust me. Lighten you load, take a knee, sweep a village with waist high grazing fire before your buddies have to go in at see what was there, all Commies"…If you are killing "pejorative here", you don't love them, Soldier are entailed to hate those they are fighting."
(0)
Reply
(0)
SFC Ernest Thurston
SFC Ernest Thurston
>1 y
Wow this whole thing has gotten way off the mark. Now we are calling people names and arguing whether we're fat or not. This thing started because a soldier had their PT score pencil whipped in order to get promoted..
(1)
Reply
(0)
SSgt Greg Willard
SSgt Greg Willard
>1 y
SFC Ernest Thurston - You're a credit to your Army! Lot more I'd like to say but to what avail? If so many soldiers are displeased with, and dare I say hate, the U.S. Army, why not make them happy and give them "At the convenience of the Army" walking papers?
Semper Fidelis is a term Marines reserve solely for other Marines, but to you I say "Semper Fi!!!". You would be welcomed in the Corps' hallowed halls with open arms. I'm sure I'm going to get blasted for this one but I will consider the sources and salute the rest of you dedicated U.S. Army Soldiers!
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Sean Moore
19
19
0
Some of you may not like what I’m about to say, but many top brass and senior NCO’s are some of the most guilty culprits for “pencil whipping” their PT scores & height/weight records... ironically, they’re the same ones who’ll bring punitive action against lower enlisted for failing PT tests and being overweight.
(19)
Comment
(0)
CPO Instructor
CPO (Join to see)
>1 y
^^^This.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SSG Bfv Section Leader
SSG (Join to see)
6 y
Truth be told!!!
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Cyber Security Sme And Trainer
15
15
0
There are the policies that should be adhered to regardless of the reasons. There are consequences for actions. From the information I'm reading, I find it hard to believe a promotable E4 would not be updating their promotion points as soon as they get more, unless it is one of those MOSes where the points are really low. If that is the case, a passing PT score would probably have had enough points. 300 points can only help promotion points. If this soldier did not know, then someone else was taking care of her promotion points in the system. I'm of the opinion she knew what was going on. Shady business all around.

That being said, has this soldier consistently performed well on PT, with high 200s and happened to hit 300 this one time? Or was this a consistent 180 soldier? Could she have had a seriously beyond belief off day during this diagnostic? Will she be able to perform well on the next one or will she likely do poorly on the record, and not fail again?

I mention this because when I was an E4, my points in secondary zone was consistently 798. My only hope of promotion was that it would fall low enough to be promoted early. I did my best to max my push ups and sit ups and ran as fast as I could to get as many points towards promotion. I still needed to wait until I hit primary zone and points fell low enough. After promotion, my average PT score was in the 220s. In recent history, I was having a bad day, failed my PT test, and passed the next 2 diagnostics without issue and I have confidence for my next record. My whole chain of command was disappointed in me because if I passed that morning of the record PT test, I would have received an award later that day, and been promoted at the first of the next month. No one was disappointed more than I, but no one was going to falsify my PT test because I was 1:30 off from passing.

So if she expects her performance for a record PT test to reflect what her actual physical conditioning readiness is, and not the 300 that was falsified, the sooner she clears it up the better. Take responsibility for what happened. It is possible to discuss it as non-judicial punishment, and will likely be flagged and lose promotable status. The soldier should do what is right, as should you CPL.
(15)
Comment
(0)
1SG Civil Affairs Specialist
1SG (Join to see)
8 y
Integrity never goes out of style.
Good on you, SSG (Join to see)
(4)
Reply
(0)
SFC Kenneth Withers
SFC Kenneth Withers
8 y
Maybe she was given the score to up her points so she could get promoted in a different unit!
(1)
Reply
(0)
SSG Cyber Security Sme And Trainer
SSG (Join to see)
8 y
Well I took a PT test for record this past Monday morning. As with most people, I know what I need to pass for my minimums. I really don't know how anyone can take a test and not know how many reps of each task they need to do or time for run to get a pass. But to get a 300. Especially on the dot and not go into extended range? I am working on a packet for the 17C MOS and it requires it so I made sure to get a copy of my 705. I'm pretty sure she knew it was falsified if she's not capable of a 300 if it was part of her promotion points on record. It goes back to them f*cking up, and getting caught. The OP CPL was asking for advice and I stick to saying come clean, and deal with whatever fall out regardless of what it is.
(3)
Reply
(0)
SPC Vonnie Jones
SPC Vonnie Jones
>1 y
I loved your response!
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Information Systems Supervisor
12
12
0
Not to take the side of any wrongdoing, but there are several pieces of information that are missing here. For example, what was the time frame between the soldier reporting to the unit and the diagnostic PT test. For example, if her previous duty station was in Florida and she was PCS’d to Ft. Carson, Colorado, that is a severe altitude change that would affect her APFT score in a major way, especially her 2 mile run time, and I as an NCO, would NOT give her an APFT right after she arrived. In other words, was she allowed time to acclimate.
(12)
Comment
(0)
SGT Shannon Mauldin
SGT Shannon Mauldin
6 y
If the altitude is an issue, they give soldiers an adjustment period for pt and most certainly a pt test, speaking from experience.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CPL Metal Worker
12
12
0
Edited 8 y ago
Thanks for squaring me away 1SG it's corrected.
(12)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Shane Funkhouser
11
11
0
To be honest part of me is disgusted that you would even be looking for a way to minimizee any of the consequences of any soldier involved with this, but a small part recognizes that it is probably out of a sense of loyalty to your peer.
The bottom line is anyone involved should face the full consiqueses of their actions.
The NCO Corps does not need anymore people with a lack of integrity.
I'm sure there was no malice involved in what they did probably just trying to hook a buddy up right?
Well the problem is as a leader we are expected to lead by example and no one involved will ever have a leg to stand on if their troops find out what they did and it could be used against them by their soldiers.
How do you correct a soldier for failing p.t. If you can't pass yourself? How do you fail a soldier if they know you pencil whipped a score for someone else?
Nope we don't need NCO's like this.
(11)
Comment
(0)
PFC Elijah Rose
PFC Elijah Rose
7 y
Blahblahblah

How about facing consequences for letting perfectly good talent ho to waste? How about not letying a POG get chaptered over a technicality? How about being a buddy instead of a bully?

There's a culture of fitness in the Army, there's no malice involved, her boss will make sure the issue is corrected, how about the OP just acts as a friend and keeps his mouth shut until after all is said and done?
(1)
Reply
(1)
SGT Armor Crew Member
SGT (Join to see)
>1 y
What the NCO Corp does not need any more of are people who think they can immediately diagnose a problem like this and assume the solider in question is 100% fucked up with zero corroborating evidence. First of all, we don't know how long ago the original APFT test was taken. We don't know whether her graders were fucked up and just accepted bad form (totally common in some units). We don't know whether she had just come back from deployment or extended absence. We just don't know a ton of information. So before we get all disgusted and fall into "smoke the shit out of joe" mode, maybe sit back and think rationally about what's going on and try to get to the bottom of the situation.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Aircraft Mechanic
11
11
0
This whole scenario doesn't really make sense to me. Why would someone pencil whip a 300 knowing that the person being scored couldn't achieve that? Why would the person receiving the score allow it to be whipped that high IF they knew it was happening? Especially going to a new unit with a promotion hanging in the balance.
(11)
Comment
(0)
1SG Civil Affairs Specialist
1SG (Join to see)
8 y
^This^
I can think of a reason, but I don't like the scenario that comes to mind.
(6)
Reply
(0)
CPL Metal Worker
CPL (Join to see)
8 y
What your thinking 1sg is more than likely the same that I'm thinking as she won't stop going on about being scared to say anything.
(3)
Reply
(0)
SSG Aircraft Mechanic
SSG (Join to see)
8 y
It kind of sounds like someone is trying to set her up for failure for whatever reason.

Or she knew about it and went with it and is now realizing she can't back out of it.
(2)
Reply
(0)
SGT Team Leader
SGT (Join to see)
>1 y
Because she did it herself and thought she wouldn't be found out? Let's be real there are some stupid MF'ers in the Army
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

How are you connected to the military?
  • Active Duty
  • Active Reserve / National Guard
  • Pre-Commission
  • Veteran / Retired
  • Civilian Supporter