Posted on Aug 9, 2014
SSG Gerhard S.
7.79K
35
68
1
1
0
I have heard many call themselves political conservatives but I know of few people who can define what conservatism is. What's your definition?
Posted in these groups: 6262122778 997339a086 z PoliticsAf2d4403 Conservative
Avatar feed
Responses: 13
SSG Gerhard S.
4
4
0
Edited >1 y ago
I see these sorts of arguments often, and hear them as well from personalities on the Radio. One of the problems with those who consider themselves "Conservatives" have no idea where the word comes from, what the principles are, or more importantly, how to express what Conservatism is. Their Definitions are almost always anecdotal, relating their beliefs to their definition of Conservatism.

I think 1LT Sandy Annala came closest with her defense of the Constitution comment.

I hope the following makes sense to all of you, and I also hope this will give you cause to consider what a "Conservative" actually is.

The Word "Conservative" has it's root in the word "Conserve" which means to maintain, or to be resistive to change.

So, In the American Sense, to be Conservative means to maintain the principles upon which this country was founded. That means upon the principles put forth in our Declaration of Independence, and the Principles, Arguments, Ratification and establishment of our Constitution.

So, where "Progressives" wish to do exactly the Opposite. That is to CHANGE the Constitution, or to make it irrelevant, or diminished in favor of more seemingly "modern" and immediately pressing issues. Progressives wish to move us slowly away from our founding principles, by addressing a never ending parade of "emergent" issues which they claim are outside the scope of our Constitution, with the aim of creating a greater and more powerful state.

Conservatives on the other hand wish to Utilize those founding principles of liberty and limited governance to keep the heavy and forceful hand of the Federal government as far away from our private and business lives as is possible. In doing so Conservatives believe the Principles of economic freedom, personal liberty and freedom of association will propel us, and influence others in the world to trade freely with each other to the benefit of all.

Now, a note here. If this idea of Conservatism doesn't sound like what the GOP does.... well, that makes you very observant. The GOP, as a rule, is as uninterested with the principles of our Founding that they have long lost the ability to be labeled Conservatives.

Any Constructive comments are welcome and appreciated.

The closest thing to Conservatives one is likely to find in the Organized political spectrum are the Libertarians. If you wonder where you stand, take this "World's smallest political quiz" to find out.

http://www.theadvocates.org/quiz/quiz.php
(4)
Comment
(0)
SSG Gerhard S.
SSG Gerhard S.
>1 y
SSG (Join to see) I wouldn't have such a problem with progressives if they actually DID work for change within the existing system. All too often their mode of change relies on mechanisms such as "judicial review", "federal" laws, regulatory expansion, and "case law", when the ONLY mechanism that exists to expand the powers of government is the Amendment process, Constitutionally speaking. Regards.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SSG Program Control Manager
SSG (Join to see)
>1 y
SSG Gerhard S. - First I'd like to point out that a lot of people who call themselves Progressive or Conservative should really be called Statist or Authoritarian. Second, mechanisms such as Federal laws and regulations are a part of our system of government. I'm not always a fan of everything that the POTUS does or every law that congress passes, however I accept that is the system within which we have to work for greater liberty and equality.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SSG Gerhard S.
SSG Gerhard S.
>1 y
SSG (Join to see) - I agree with your first comment, however, regarding the balance, I would only point out that when the Federal government creates laws and regulations that expand its powers beyond those allowed it by the Constitution, they are NOT doing so "within the system". Such additions of federal power, (which come at the expense of our freedoms and our pocket books), are only permitted through the Amendment process. If you disagree I would respectfully ask you to place your finger on that clause of our Constitution that gives the government the power to expand its own power, unilaterally, by its own regulation and lawmaking.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SSG Program Control Manager
SSG (Join to see)
>1 y
SSG Gerhard S. - Ultimately it is the courts who get to decide which laws or regulations are constitutional or unconstitutional. I don't always like or agree with their findings, however that is how things work in our system of government.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SPC Senior Analyst
3
3
0
Edited 10 y ago
80 100
I self identify as a conservative, despite this little quiz defining me as a libertarian. While it's true that in a Venn diagram, there would be much overlapping, one plank in the libertarian platform prevents me from changing my affiliation towards them - I despise isolationism. I don't think it's a realistic or safe way to look at the world.

In other news, as a conservative - and a Christian evangelical one at that, (that may be important to know in a minute, given a particular view or two), I also believe the following:

1. Government shouldn't tell me what drugs I can or can't put into my body. I'm not a recreational drug user - but if I were, it's not the government's business.

2. Government shouldn't regulate who anyone can marry. I'm heterosexual, and because of my Christian beliefs, I believe marriage is one man and one woman. But those are MY beliefs. Marriage didn't originate with government...God created marriage. That makes it HIS to define, not government's. I don't condone gay marriage, but not because I have a problem with it...but because God does. Therefore, this isn't a matter to which government should involve itself, but rather one that should be between a person and God. I'm called to love my neighbor...not judge him - no matter how tempted I might be to do so.

3. Government shouldn't have the power to dictate what school my child must attend. For that matter, the Federal government shouldn't even have education on it's radar. Education is a state issue. And yes, the federal government IS involved in dictating school assignment by virtue of controlling states that take federal dollars for the education system. The threat of taking that funding away from the states for non-compliance allows DC to control local schools in a very real way.

I could go on for pages and pages...

Suffice it to say that I firmly believe that the Federal government should only have the power that was explicitly given to it in the Constitution. ALL other rights not named were reserved for the states.

However, strong politicians coupled with an uninformed and uninterested electorate have allowed the central government to usurp powers that were never granted to them. Seeing the over reach of the current administration is proof of what I'm talking about - and he is not the first, by any means.

But the fact that we seem to be deteriorating as a republic in this respect, only strengthens my resolve to remain steadfast in the face of such intrusion into my life.
(3)
Comment
(0)
SSG Gerhard S.
SSG Gerhard S.
10 y
It sounds a lot like you hold Conservative beliefs, which makes you much more a Libertarian than a Republican. Well stated my friend.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SSG Gerhard S.
SSG Gerhard S.
>1 y
SPC (Join to see) , I am curious though as to what you mean by the Libertarian plank suggesting isolationism? The Libertarians want to engage with free and equitable trade with the everybody, and to quote their platform regarding international affairs, "American foreign policy should seek an America at peace with the world. Our foreign policy should emphasize defense against attack from abroad and enhance the likelihood of peace by avoiding foreign entanglements. We would end the current U.S. government policy of foreign intervention, including military and economic aid. We recognize the right of all people to resist tyranny and defend themselves and their rights. We condemn the use of force, and especially the use of terrorism, against the innocent, regardless of whether such acts are committed by governments or by political or revolutionary groups."

And here on the use of our military "We support the maintenance of a sufficient military to defend the United States against aggression. The United States should both avoid entangling alliances and abandon its attempts to act as policeman for the world. We oppose any form of compulsory national service."

I often hear people on the radio, and on tv calling Libertarians "isolationist". I would start by saying that this country was founded on military "isolationism" i.e. to be used in defense of the United States. As Thomas Jefferson told us. America should maintain "Peace, commerce and honest friendship with all nations; entangling alliances with none." Statements such as these are directly in line with Libertarian views, and since it is one of our founding principles, it makes the Libertarian standpoint the Conservative viewpoint.

The sense I get from some of those I hear today is that we should be less isolationist by sending our military around the world to meddle in local and regional issues, while trading with other countries less, and erecting trade barriers with those whom we disagree. This is the exact opposite of the founding (Conservative) principles.

Interested in your thoughts, and I would also be interested in the planks that make Libertarians Isolationist in the Conservative sense.
Respectful Regards

https://www.lp.org/platform
(0)
Reply
(0)
SSG Program Control Manager
SSG (Join to see)
>1 y
Ae36adc0
That is a really short quiz.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
MAJ G 6 Plans Oic
3
3
0
Definition of conservative to me deals with personal responsibility and accountability.

Liberals look to be taken care of, conservatives look to take care of themselves. Liberals blame tools (guns) and try to ban them when something bad happens. Conservatives blame the person (back to personal accountability). Conservatives look for everyone to be equal at the start. Liberals look for everyone to be equal at the finish. I could keep going on, but I'll leave it at that for now.
(3)
Comment
(0)
SSG Gerhard S.
SSG Gerhard S.
10 y
Trying to blame economic woes on the rich, or on Business is misplaced for history shows us that it is Governmental policies, and interference in the marketplace that dramatically affect the economics of the individual, and of whole nations alike.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SSG Gerhard S.
SSG Gerhard S.
10 y
Maj. Dews, the article you cite states that nearly 10% of those born into the lowest quintile AND 20% of those born in the middle quintiles make it to the top quintile. when compared to the rest of the industrialized world, we are highly mobile.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Maj John Bell
Maj John Bell
9 y
MAJ (Join to see) - Yet if you look at people who do not come from affluent upbringing, on a per capita basis 1st generation immigrants are more likely to become millionaires than any other group. And that statistic like all these others, proves nothing. You cannot accurately apply scientific reasoning when you cannot isolate and control the variables.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SSG Gerhard S.
SSG Gerhard S.
>1 y
Excellent point Maj John Bell
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close