Why do some NCOs feel that they have an MD when dealing with their Troop's Profiles?
Chief this a tough topic to pinpoint any specific "correct" answer. I agree that some NCOs think they are doctors and know best! I assure you that I am not one of them.
However there are some doctors that just don't know how to write in a profile form to convey what they are really trying to make the leaders understand. I have even had civilian doctors write profiles that are just not authorized. An example: I had a Soldier who (amongst many other issues) just didn't like to shave and had a shaving profile (possibly a legit need, which I did not question) his beard was too long and I told him that it needed to be trimmed to 1/8 inch. He whipped out his profile and the doctor had put that he could have a 1/2" beard. No where is this even authorized.
Recently here in FT Lee a doctor gave a Soldier a memo stating that due to shoulder surgery he does not have to be in tolerance with AWCP. Also a no-go! If an NCO does not sometimes question "medical professionals" somewhere along the line they will be out of control with profiles.
Again, I do not think it is that NCOs think they are DRs, but that there needs to be a good checks and balances process when these "MD having doctors" are trying to implement rules for us.
If it was not for HIPPA I would post a profile that I saw a few years back. It was very clear that this Soldier told the Dr what he wanted on his profile. Stated he could not work longer than eight hours at a time, and that he could not wear a military uniform for mare than eight hours at a time. Went on to say that he could not sit, stand, lay for more than 20 minutes at a time. This particular Soldier had a 35 minute drive to work. How did he make it to work if he couldn't sit for more than 20 minutes? I let it go (with a plan) for 1 week. On week two had him re-evaluated and the profile remained in effect. So that day I made him stay on post in the barracks so that he wouldn't break his profile by sitting more than 20 minutes driving to work. By the end of the day his profile was changed.
In regards to the soldier that was excused from the AWCP, the following is an excerpt from AR 40-501 Standards of Medical Fitness:
7–13. Physical profile and the Army Weight Control Program
The DA Form 3349 will not be used to excuse Soldiers from the provisions of AR 600–9. The AR 600–9 contains a
standard memorandum for completion by a physician if there is an underlying or associated disease process that is the
cause of the overweight condition. The inability to perform all APFT events or the use of certain medications is not
generally considered sufficient medical rationale to exempt a Soldier from AR 600–9
AR 600-9 para 3-3 has a list of exemptions which include combat amputees, pregnant soldiers, and IET soldiers (for the first 180 days of service) among other things. It still states that the soldier needs to maintain a soldierly appearance.
It also includes an exception for soldiers that have been hospitalized:
3–16. Hospitalization
Personnel who meet this regulation’s standards and are hospitalized for 30 continuous days or more will be exempt
from the standards for the duration of the hospitalization and the recovery period as specified by their profile, not to
exceed 90 days from discharge from the hospital. If at the end of the specified recovery period the Soldier exceeds the
allowable body fat standard, a DA Form 268 will be initiated on the Soldier and he or she will be enrolled in the
ABCP.
The Army makes an allowance for soldiers going through hospitalization and a short time after.
The second is that, despite the urging of the most gung-ho NCO, the Army is a marathon, not a sprint. I would much rather a Soldier have the opportunity to get out of the Army on his or her own terms, and not on a medical chapter. I know what I am, and a doctor is not one of them. There is nothing so important that I have to put my Soldier's health in danger, especially for something like morning PT. If a Soldier of mine comes up to me saying he is hurt, he is going to the proper channels to get fixed, and he is going to follow that channel's guidance to the letter.
This NCO called my office to let us know that the next day was a road march day and what we were to do. "Show up at 0600 with PT uniform and boots with a rucksack that weighs 35 lbs" or something like that.
I showed up in PT uniform, but because of my profile I knew better than to try a road march so there were no boots and no rucksack. She went off. She told me she was going to see me getting an article 15 because I had disobeyed the direct order of a sergeant. I calmly asked her if I should obey her order or the major's order that gave me the profile. She said I was "full of shit" (her words) and wanted the major's number. I said, "Don't worry. He'll be calling you."
With that said, I have seen soldiers that abuse their profile. You will see soldiers that have a minor injury that are given a no run profile only to see them walking the PT track like they are taking a stroll down the beach. The point of PT is to improve (or at least maintain) your physical fitness. Just because soldiers with minor injuries have a no run profile doesn't mean that they can't walk fast to get their heart rate up and work the muscle groups in their legs. I at one point walked at 25:15 for the walk event for a record PT test. I know it is only pass/fail but I was trying to get something out of it. I can say that after 7 years with the no run profile, I was able to get my profile lifted to run at own pace and distance. I still get a lot of crap for not running in formation with the unit but I know that if I do, I will undo all the work I have put in to better myself and heal.
Long story short, only a doctor can tell what the soldier can and cannot do and how long it will take to heal. Don't group all profiles together. Not all of us are shaming or malingering. If you feel your soldier is shaming, have to commander get more information from that soldiers doctor on what the extent of the injury is, what the treatment is, and what the estimated healing time will be.
I've tried to explain the NCO job to some outside the military. Somehow, I end up describing the job as parent, coach, mentor, on the job trainer, physical fitness trainer, administrative clerk, financial planner, resource manager, and safety inspector (just to name a few)
I've also had many platoon sergeants come to be trying to prove a soldier is malingering. We had a hell of a time trying to establish a pattern of fraudulent visits for medical care. The issue, as explained to me by my PA, is that providers are supposed to treat the pain as described by the patient. There is no empirical way to prove a patient's pain is in fact a 9 out of 10. The provider has to go off that, among other things, to see if the treatment plan is working. So proving malingering in a Soldier would take a long history of ineffective treatment coupled with a fluctuating story regarding his pain scale, events leading up to the injury, or any other details along his treatment plan. It's easier to prove the soldier is violating their treatment plan than it is to say they are malingering.
If the unit is authorized a PA on it's MTOE, then that's usually the first person to go to for clarification. I've had infantry team leaders bring me their soldier's profiles looking for clarification and I pass it by the PA.
If you don't have a PA readily available, a phone call to the profiling physician may be in order. If it becomes an issue about HIPAA, the commanding officer can get involved. They are allowed more leeway due to the command position they are in.
If a soldier has physical limitations put on paper from a civilian physician, then it has to be put on a DA 689 or DA 3349 by a military physician. This ensures the physician (who is supposed follow profiling standards IAW AR 40-501, Standards of Medical Fitness) properly translates the limitations into "Army speak".
Essentially, the profiling process is a recommendation for the solider so that they can get better. There is an allowance for commanders to order soldiers to violate all or part of their profile if it is absolutely necessary to accomplish the mission. This isn't typically enforced because there are few situations (outside of combat) that a commander would take the risk of further physical damage to a soldier and having to explain it to higher (ie, higher command, or MEB members)
As for the regulation saying profiled soldiers must at all times carry a copy of their profile, I know I read it somewhere but can't, for the life of me, find it again. It would still qualify as a lawful order from any level of the NCO support channel or the Chain of Command. Even if I trust my soldier entirely, if he says he's on a profile, I need to read the exact limitations imparted by that profiling officer. It's not something I'm going to take someone's "word" for it.
Do I agree? Not at all.
As I have stated previously in other threads, I have a P2 profile, so I completely understand what a profile is, and how sometimes there are just limitations on what a Soldier can physically do. However, I also know what a profile is, and that a person can overcome certain physical limitations with determination, desire and will. There is a fine line between "pushing through the pain" and torture, and we as NCOs need to not only realize that but also understand that the line will be different with each individual Soldier.
Much like with every other individual aspect of supervision, each Soldier is going to react differently to a situation. It is up to you as a leader to recognize which method works in each situation, and target accordingly.

Profiles
Physical Training
NCOs
