Posted on Oct 8, 2019
Why do some people jump to the conclusion you're blaming all of the military for your problem, when it's unique to a specific command?
1.18K
5
4
2
2
0
Yes there are great people in our society and military in general. I did not start negative reports. In fact all my negative information comes from the government officials “We the People” DOD annual reports, Inspector General Reports, OSC Reports, BUMED Reports, Congressional Reports, MISHAP Reports, Officer Reports, and the Improvements in Laws UCMJ Commands to protect victims of assault and discrimination or other hostile work environments etc etc etc. They informed me exactly how and why what casualty illness injury happened. But if you bring it up some will jump on you.
Posted 5 y ago
Responses: 2
Problem are career civil servants. Cannot fire them. Bush wanted TSA to be contractors so they could be fired.
(2)
(0)
MSgt Michael Smith
Career Civil Servants (like me) are that way for one simple reason: So they cannot become targets of political reprisal. How could the government hire and maintain top-notch employees if they got fired every four years on the whim of the new President. I can guarantee you that Trump-esque politicians would campaign on firing half or more of the federal workforce. It's fun for know-nothings to believe and vote on the idea that Federal Employees sit around all day and don't do anything useful. That is not correct. Did you know that most Federal Employees are vets? About 1 in 5 I would say.
(0)
(0)
PO3 Aaron Hassay
Reservists are basically dual hatted civil servants I have found out giving their best I should know and this report is one of the reports that directly has something to do with the era and legal world and how it all works together. See I never wanted to read this kind of information and even think it was possible when I graduated bootcamp meritoriously 1994 Great-lakes.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B7lQ90By3XqwQW92LS1KRWM2VGM/view?usp=drivesdk
""""For example, on April 1, 1997, an Air Force Reserve C 130 aircraft crashed
at Tegucigalpa, Honduras. Seven RC crew members survived this crash with incapacitating
injuries. Although the survivors were entitled to incapacitation pay and medical treatment,
prevailing restrictions precluded them from being retained on active duty for treatment of their
injuries past the period of duty prescribed in their orders. Because length of duty status
determines entitlements, their family members were not eligible for health care through the
military
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B7lQ90By3XqwQW92LS1KRWM2VGM/view?usp=drivesdk
""""For example, on April 1, 1997, an Air Force Reserve C 130 aircraft crashed
at Tegucigalpa, Honduras. Seven RC crew members survived this crash with incapacitating
injuries. Although the survivors were entitled to incapacitation pay and medical treatment,
prevailing restrictions precluded them from being retained on active duty for treatment of their
injuries past the period of duty prescribed in their orders. Because length of duty status
determines entitlements, their family members were not eligible for health care through the
military
(0)
(0)
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B7lQ90By3XqwQW92LS1KRWM2VGM/view?usp=drivesdk
"For example, on April 1, 1997, an Air Force Reserve C 130 aircraft crashed
at Tegucigalpa, Honduras. Seven RC crew members survived this crash with incapacitating
injuries. Although the survivors were entitled to incapacitation pay and medical treatment,
prevailing restrictions precluded them from being retained on active duty for treatment of their
injuries past the period of duty prescribed in their orders. Because length of duty status
determines entitlements, their family members were not eligible for health care through the
military
"For example, on April 1, 1997, an Air Force Reserve C 130 aircraft crashed
at Tegucigalpa, Honduras. Seven RC crew members survived this crash with incapacitating
injuries. Although the survivors were entitled to incapacitation pay and medical treatment,
prevailing restrictions precluded them from being retained on active duty for treatment of their
injuries past the period of duty prescribed in their orders. Because length of duty status
determines entitlements, their family members were not eligible for health care through the
military
(1)
(0)
Read This Next