Posted on Sep 8, 2016
Why is there such a long wait for reserve component officer and warrant federal recognition/promotion?
457K
2.52K
3.17K
137
137
0
Can anyone tell me why the process takes so long for RC officer/warrant promotions to run through the FedRec cycle? I'm an ARNG officer and I've had my state promotion orders for CPT since the middle of April. I've been tracking my packet on the ARNG-G1 website and it was awaiting addition to a scroll until a month ago and last week the scroll was ready to start the approval DoD cycle. Thoughts?
Edited 9 y ago
Posted 9 y ago
Responses: 419
MAJ(P) (Join to see) that is why a lot of ARNG officers jump ship and come to the reserves. We are larger and not reliant on just the slots in the state in your AOC. Promotions tend to be faster as well.
(1)
(0)
MAJ (Join to see)
My wife is in the Reserves. It totally explains why the people from her unit were like, "Give us a call when you want to pick up MAJ."
(0)
(0)
CW3 (Join to see)
Unfortunately, there are no Special Forces reserve units because they were deactivated in the early 1990s. As such, we have no choice but to be in the ARNG, which, by the way, has very few 180As (SF Warrant officers).
(0)
(0)
MAJ (Join to see)
CW3 (Join to see) - That's the thing that gives me the greatest pause. I am not an 18 series (I'm a PA,) but I love being with 19th Group. This has been some of the most challenging and rewarding work of my career so far, and I want to stay as long as I can on one hand. On the other, I want to do this Army thing as long as the Army will let me, so that career progression is awful important too.
(1)
(0)
If U06-17 hits 300-Days in the FedRec process, will that be the same as scoring 300 on the APFT?
(1)
(0)
(0)
(0)
CW2 (Join to see)
Well we aren't far from it.........
Awaiting Dir of Army Staff Appr; U06-17; 281 Days in DoD Approval cycle
Awaiting Dir of Army Staff Appr; U06-17; 281 Days in DoD Approval cycle
(0)
(0)
CW3 (Join to see)
See my reply above from 4 days ago, but I think it may be at OSD. Do not hold me to that, although it was information I learned after calling Renee Marshal's phone number. Instead, I spoke to another lady and when I gave her our scroll, she quickly replied it was sitting at SecDef. I would call back, but if they have caller ID, they may have already blocked my number. Perhaps I should call from a different number and when they ask my first and last name, I will reply with, "First name, Chief, last name, Warrant Officer."
(1)
(0)
(1)
(0)
(0)
(0)
CW3 (Join to see)
CW3 (Join to see) - Yeah I know, I really hope it publishes before the end of the year.
(1)
(0)
On P09-17...210 Days...With Thanksgiving approaching, no chance this order comes soon. Awesome.
(1)
(0)
MAJ (Join to see)
I read on one of these threads that the average “days scrolling” was 209 for P01 thru 07. At this points it’s a joke. There is no excuse at all.
(0)
(0)
MAJ(P) (Join to see)
I was a good sport about it for the first 120 days, but this is ridiculous. This type of thing doesn't happen with promotions in the civilian world.
(0)
(0)
MAJ (Join to see)
It’s absurd. I was thinking today, how if you had a prior service person who is commissioned and is waiting on this for a retirement “high three” and how much it would screw them; pending their timeline!
(0)
(0)
MAJ(P) (Join to see)
I'm AGR and have 3 years, 9 months until I hit 20 years of active federal service. I'm still undecided if I'm going to retire at 20 AFS, but hopefully, it doesn't take another 9 months.
(0)
(0)
Has anyone made an inquiry on U11-17? We went to JAG around day 80, we are on day 142 now.
(1)
(0)
(0)
(0)
CW3 (Join to see)
Travis, we have 3 guys on your scroll in our unit. One of them is working wth Congresswoman Mia Loves office about your particular scroll. If he gets any substantive updates from them I'll post it here.
(0)
(0)
MAJ (Join to see)
CW3 (Join to see) - I am in Mia Love's district too, on P08-17. Here is the final reply that I got:
(0)
(0)
MAJ (Join to see)
Additionally, the District Director that I was corresponding with said that although he agrees that a year to process promotions is excessive, that unless the service has a recurring problem that cannot or is not being resolved internally, they are typically hands off. However, the squeaky wheel gets the grease, so the more people make this known, the greater the chance that there is meaningful change.
(0)
(0)
CW3 (Join to see)
That is, however, I found the real one lying around the hidden archives at the Pentagon, sort of like that last scene in Indiana Jones and The Raiders of the Lost Ark. Yep, "We have our top men on it, our TOP men!"
(4)
(0)
For those on U06-17, here is an update I received from Renee Marshall, who is a very nice lady. She has a very tough job fielding all of the calls about this FedRec process. I can assume that a majority of these calls are not meant to chat and shoot the breeze to see 'how things are going'. No, no, poor Ms. Marshall most likely takes the brunt of all the complaints about this process, which explains that when I spoke to her she sounded exhausted. Good thing it is a Friday. Nevertheless, U06-17 and a couple of other scrolls that are in the same predicament is on the radar in that yesterday there was a meeting held to address this issue. Ms. Marshall is tracking down what happened as a result of the outcome of this meeting, with the hopes the answer is in the positive and our scrolls are moving forward from that of a one-legged, sub-sloth pace to maybe a sloth with two legs.
(1)
(0)
MAJ (Join to see)
I don't envy Renee Marshall's position. She probably has no real control over what is happening, but is the POC for the FED REC system and is probably catching tremendous amounts of heat from it. It is great that people are having meetings and such, but action would be my preference. The meetings don't seem to be making a difference, as things are getting worse for those of us on the unfortunate older scrolls, and now the G1 trackers aren't even counting days. This process is slowly driving me insane. I have simply started referring to myself as "The Terminal LT" whenever someone asks when I am going to be promoted.
(0)
(0)
CW3 (Join to see)
You are correct inasmuch as it seems in the government sector the GSs have meetings purely to have meetings, during which they plan for follow-on meetings to discuss what happened in the previous meeting, then they plan again for another future meeting. It is, indeed, a cyclic endeavor. And then there are the GSs who remind me of Milton Waddams from Office Space, the kind of folks who are there because, well, they just are, although we have no clue what it is they do. Nor do they have a clue; they simply show up to occupy that void in the aether. They even chime in on the meetings to agree or disagree on the topic, depending on which way the scale tips, answering with, "Whatever you are thinking I am positive it is correct." Or, they throw out a bunch of disjointed facts until one of them has some semblance of relevance to the topic, sort of like throwing a handful of darts with the hopes that one of them will hit the dart board. Yes, what I have just described is what occurs in the inner sanctum of the esteemed FedRec process, one in which all of us entrusted these Milton Waddams to walk our packets through this Rube Goldberg-like process.
(1)
(0)
CW3 (Join to see)
Now that we are entering the holiday season, I expect this process will come to a standstill. Hell, if these FedWreckers can’t complete this process on a regular work week (ha, that’s a relative term), then how can we expect them to accomplish this through November and December?
(0)
(0)
I spoke with a 1 Star who provided the following information. The NGB is getting hounded weekly with complaints. They know this is a problem. Right now one solution on the table is to make smaller scrolls so they take less time. I am on scroll 13-17 and it has moved quickly to JAG within 2 months of showing up on the NGB G1 website. This is not going to help those of you on earlier scrolls, but if you are on 13-17 and later you may have gotten extremely lucky.
(1)
(0)
LTC (Join to see)
seems like the count has started again and is up to date.
P05-17 published in 201 and that was a quick scroll. P09-17 was on track for that date up till this Asst Sec Army, Man, Res Affairs office got involved...
P05-17 published in 201 and that was a quick scroll. P09-17 was on track for that date up till this Asst Sec Army, Man, Res Affairs office got involved...
(0)
(0)
MAJ (Join to see)
P01-18 hasn't had any movement since being moved from P16-17 in October. 90 zero days since that move and no other updates since my State order in August which is now over 5 months.. Over 190 days of zero day..
(0)
(0)
CPT (Join to see)
MAJ (Join to see) - I am approaching 365 days, if that makes you feel better. Hopefully they figure this mess out
(0)
(0)
I just got an email from my G1 that P03-17 published. Only took 266 days on FedRec (at least since it was last updated) and over a year since submitting my packet. I can definitely say that because of this I will be ending my career at least 4 years earlier than I intended as it has thrown me back almost 2 years in terms of timing for the next grade.
(1)
(0)
CPT (Join to see)
I wouldn't be too caught up with the time lost. Especially as a CPT and below. Might actually turn out to be a blessing later. However this wait was ridiculous. Way too long.
(0)
(0)
CPT (Join to see)
Well as a prior enlisted who already has 20 years in, the lost time from when I took the CPT slot back on 10/1/2015 to almost two years later finally getting promoted is a killer in me wanting to retire as a MAJ. I had some thoughts of going for LTC but that is all but done now. And the two years of not getting promoted has put me behind some of my peers that got promoted by the mandatory boards. And that doesn't include the $3-5K that I lost in pay over the two years.
It makes no sense that as soon as you are assigned the position and are eligible for promotion that they don't make that your DOR and back pay you to that date. If you went through mandatory boards that would be the case. Somehow we get punished for being ahead of our peers. How is that fair?
What other job do you start a new position and not get paid the rate for the position.
It makes no sense that as soon as you are assigned the position and are eligible for promotion that they don't make that your DOR and back pay you to that date. If you went through mandatory boards that would be the case. Somehow we get punished for being ahead of our peers. How is that fair?
What other job do you start a new position and not get paid the rate for the position.
(3)
(0)
CPT (Join to see)
So I thought I would actually figure out exactly how much money I lost. I had 128 drill periods in my current slot with a $47.41 pay difference for a total of $6068.48
(2)
(0)
MAJ (Join to see)
Ouch. I don't think it would bother me so much if our Time in Grade and Pay were backdated to our state's promotion date. So far I have *only* lost ~$4,000 since I have been ADOS since May.
(1)
(0)
CPT (Join to see)
CPT(P) (Join to see) - When I went through AG school I was told a scroll was comprised of 1000 names. I have never heard anything less.
(0)
(0)
CPT (Join to see)
Just a note about the submission for the correction on date of rate, if needed. I found this while perusing the ABCMR guidebook. "Members of the Army National Guard applying to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR). Many Army National Guard regulations require the members of the Army National Guard to apply first to their State Adjutant General and then to the National Guard Bureau for correction of records. If after exhausting these resources, a member of the Army National Guard still feels that there is error or injustice in their record, they can apply to the ABCMR. They should include with their application a copy any communication they have had with their State Adjutant General or the National Guard Bureau concerning the requested correction."
This issue should be big enough for the TAGs to bring up to NGB.
This issue should be big enough for the TAGs to bring up to NGB.
(0)
(0)
CPT (Join to see)
Are you sure, P07-17 was published a month ago.
I am in P08-17 still waiting in JAG, so much for talking care of guard soldiers
I am in P08-17 still waiting in JAG, so much for talking care of guard soldiers
(0)
(0)
What is your Date of Rank after Fed Rec? Is it the date on your state promotion orders, or the date the SEC DEF signs? If it actually is the date the SEC DEF signs, then what is the point of state promotion orders if CPT and above don't receive back pay and time in grade?
(1)
(0)

Suspended Profile
CPT (Join to see) - Sir, I agree. I've literally already had 4 or 5 LT friends send up packets for transfer to the reserves, just to escape the fed rec process.
MAJ (Join to see)
CPT (Join to see) - You make good points, but as alluded to earlier, a process that seems indifferent to Soldiers and their careers will push talent elsewhere. I'm ADOS now, and the FED REC process is costing me over $1,000 per month that it drags on. With no TIG/Back Pay it is incredibly frustrating. Multiply that times 3 or 4 over the span of a Guard career, and potentially that could rob someone of an entire grade. It just doesn't make sense that routine low to mid level promotions need/have to be such a source of anger and heartache. I don't know what it'll take to change the process, but if none of us make our concerns known, the only known is that nothing will change.
(3)
(0)
MAJ (Join to see)
I've brought this up to my BN and they have agreed that they should put the promotable Soldier in a para/lin of the next grade prior to taking their actual position. This would allow the Soldiers packet to start the process earlier and hopefully receive their FEDREC sooner. For example; If I am chosen to take command in 6 months from now, I am moved to a vacant O3 billet so the state can start the promotion order and submit to NGB. At least this way you would only be waiting a couple months for your FEDREC instead of 8+. I know everyone's FEDREC process time isn't the same length, but it would help for sure. THAT is taking care of Soldiers.
(1)
(0)
LTC (Join to see)
1LT Philroy Hinds - Also, if you drop dead while you are in the ridiculous FedRec quagmire, you are listed on the State Militia rolls at the rank the state promoted you to.
(0)
(0)
Active vs Reserves = Assets being sent vs number of slots and budget constraints: US is broke. And Politics willing to throw freedom to sewer to take care of people who don't take care of self in US and world.
(1)
(0)
L02-17 is going on day 160 on the tracker, anyone talk to NGB for an update?
(1)
(0)

Suspended Profile
CH (2LT) (Join to see) - I saw a scroll from last year spend about 17 days on this step. Hoping ours is here for 2 days max.
Am I the only one having difficulty accessing the antiquated, poorly designed, and sub-sloth driven G1 website (link below)? Regardless, if and when I do log in, I will continue to see the disappointing results of this comical FedRec process. In December, the state published my promotion orders, yet as of today, or so I think, my packet doubles as a coffee coaster on the JAG's desk. I would list my Scroll number, but for now I must wait until the G1 hamsters spin their wheels fast enough to generate the minimum power to bring up the servers.
http://arngg1.ngb.army.mil/SelfService/careercenter/soldierdata.aspx
http://arngg1.ngb.army.mil/SelfService/careercenter/soldierdata.aspx
(1)
(0)
CPT (Join to see)
Scroll P03-17 sat at JAG for 150+ days with the only explanation coming second hand from individuals calling NGB for updates.
(0)
(0)
CW3 (Join to see)
Thank you. It is amazing, however, that out of all of the INTs, RUMINT is the most reliable intelligence.
(2)
(0)
Scroll U10-17 Update/Comment Thread:
Check your packet status here:
https://arngg1.ngb.army.mil/SelfService/careercenter/soldierdata.aspx
As of 20170629. Day 37
Check your packet status here:
https://arngg1.ngb.army.mil/SelfService/careercenter/soldierdata.aspx
As of 20170629. Day 37
(1)
(0)
CW4(P) (Join to see)
Has anyone contacted NGB about this scroll? If not, I will we calling this week. Does anyone have CW3 Poppy's contact information? Thanks
(0)
(0)
CPT (Join to see)
CW4(P) (Join to see) - Did you ever call? I'm too afraid to. 253 days for my scroll.....
(0)
(0)
CW4(P) (Join to see)
I have reached out to NGB several times, I have not been to talk to anyone yet. I did receive a email that my Congressional inquiry is being researched.
(0)
(0)
New question. For those of you that have published orders and are at the end of this goat rope, how far back are you getting back paid? I have a CW2 in my unit that waited a week short of 365 days from state orders to published fed rec and they back paid him all the way back to the day the state recognized his promotion. I'd like to know if anyone else had that experience.
(1)
(0)
1LT (Join to see)
I'm not sure if it is entirely correct. I believe it's case-by-case and state will only go back a few months for backpay. Remember, it's state money, not federal money.
(0)
(0)

Suspended Profile
1LT (Join to see) - I have a few LT buddies who didn't get back paid all the way to state orders, though generally those were the guys who had to wait a super long time because of weird issues with their scrolls. When I commissioned, NY took forever to federally recognize me as a 2LT, so I went to AT and got paid as an E5, and they didn't even back pay me for all of that, so I have my doubts that I'll receive back pay all the way to November '16. It would be nice though, having been ADOS for most of the wait.
2LT (Join to see)
2LT(P) (Verify To See) - If you are ADOS, depending on your agency, they most likely have budgeted in your promotion- so you should see that pot of money come to you eventually... For M-Day, it does come out of State funds so most likely won't see the entire load drop.
I know for Counter Drug in the Guard they had to budget my promotion in and almost cancel my orders because I was expensive all of a sudden but it worked out :-)
I know for Counter Drug in the Guard they had to budget my promotion in and almost cancel my orders because I was expensive all of a sudden but it worked out :-)
(0)
(0)

Suspended Profile
That makes sense. I caught a glance of the cost estimate, and I was wondering why I cost my unit over 80000 for a relatively short period of time.
Anyone from this group L03-17, my state recognized me in December but I am still waiting for fed rec.
(1)
(0)
(0)
(0)
1LT (Join to see)
Im in L03-17 mine is froze at Sec Def at 140 Days has anyone else received their Fed Req from this group
(0)
(0)
(1)
(0)
CPT Michael Ludwick
Outstanding. Looking back at my notes this is day 312 of my packet hitting the NGB level for acceptance. It's hard to stay optimistic. Really thought it would be this week.
(1)
(0)
CPT (Join to see)
Now that we are in mid-May, I certainly wouldn't expect anything until June based on the approach of Memorial Day.
(1)
(0)
CPT(P) (Join to see)
Someone said that they were informed that the Scroll had been signed, but not returned to the NGB. How certain was that particular source that anything had actually been signed?
(0)
(0)
CPT (Join to see)
I went back through the posts, and someone indicated 16 days ago that they spoke with a SFC Palmer at NGB who indicated the scroll was signed by the SECDEF on May 2nd. Certainly do not have any proof or confirmation, so for what it is worth.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next