13
13
0
Without using Google,Wiki, or any other search engine...using only what you know the second you read the question -- Give your opinion why Marines, trained in Amphibious landing, were not used at Normandy on D-Day.
Let's keep this civil, because this is a topic that could easily go awry.
Thoughts?
Opinions?
Facts?
Insider information?
Let's keep this civil, because this is a topic that could easily go awry.
Thoughts?
Opinions?
Facts?
Insider information?
Edited 11 y ago
Posted 11 y ago
Responses: 131
The Pacific theater was made of multiple amphibious actions involving relatively limited numbers of men and material in a somewhat restricted area. The Normandy landings were a major invasion, the success of which, in large part depended on massive infusions of men and material. Then to be followed by numerous major land engagements. The sheer scope of those engagements would have devastated the Marine Corps. On top of the rest of it, you have to divert men and material from the pacific theater to the Atlantic, and then mix the command structure into an already incredibly complex hodge-podge mixture of different allied free forces, resistance units and sundry other "feeders from the trough".
The Pacific landings were sharp limited engagements, after which the Army could land garrison forces while the Marines reconstituted and prepared for the next landing. If memory serves, the tentative plans for the invasion of the Japanese Home Islands called for a major commitment of Army troops for the main landings with the Marine Corps. to be making strategic supporting strikes rather than having our premier amphibious assault troops being ground up in a numbers match.
So to sum it up in a compact bundle, "The Marine Corps. was simply not the proper tool for that particular job."
The Pacific landings were sharp limited engagements, after which the Army could land garrison forces while the Marines reconstituted and prepared for the next landing. If memory serves, the tentative plans for the invasion of the Japanese Home Islands called for a major commitment of Army troops for the main landings with the Marine Corps. to be making strategic supporting strikes rather than having our premier amphibious assault troops being ground up in a numbers match.
So to sum it up in a compact bundle, "The Marine Corps. was simply not the proper tool for that particular job."
(1)
(0)
Sgt Lauren Weigand
Okay, PO3 Jeeter had the best answer for me. Thanks. it is completely obvious to send marines to a more amphibious style theater then to Normandy.
(0)
(0)
Quite simply the USMC was committed in total to the Pacific theater of operations where the strategy of island hopping requires their unique training. Save for the one amphibious landing the Normandy assault was going to be an extended ground operation until the war's conclusion in Europe, more suited for the size, scope and location of U.S. Army forces.
(1)
(0)
They were otherwise indisposed at other island vacation destination locations
(1)
(0)
SSG(P) (Join to see)
Ha, no islands I'd want to ever vacation. Actually Marines hardly ever travel to, deploy or visit any place worthy of visiting twice...my experience anyways.
(0)
(0)
Ok here we go from the hip...I have not scrolled any further than this, either. The Marines were not chosen for Normandy because they were just a tad too busy to join the party in the European Theater of Operations because they were fighting the Japanese on the other side of the world in the Pacific Theater of Operations. How did I do? :D
(1)
(0)
SSG(P) (Join to see)
You pretty much nailed it Chief. That and the Corps was not a sizable force like the US Army was....
(0)
(0)
I hope this will answer your question as to why Marines were not used in Normandy
THE MARINE CORPS IN WORLD WAR II
The U. S. Marines Corps was America's amphibious spearhead of World War II. Its mission was to assault and capture enemy-held islands in the Pacific campaigns. At its peak strength in 1945, the Corps had over 485,000 Marines serving on active duty.
The 6 Marine divisions that served in the war fought, bled and died in some of the toughest battles in the long, brutal history of warfare. They won victories across the Pacific against a fanatical enemy, but at a terrible price; nearly 20,000 Marines died in World War II, and more than 67,000 were wounded.
THE MARINE CORPS IN WORLD WAR II
The U. S. Marines Corps was America's amphibious spearhead of World War II. Its mission was to assault and capture enemy-held islands in the Pacific campaigns. At its peak strength in 1945, the Corps had over 485,000 Marines serving on active duty.
The 6 Marine divisions that served in the war fought, bled and died in some of the toughest battles in the long, brutal history of warfare. They won victories across the Pacific against a fanatical enemy, but at a terrible price; nearly 20,000 Marines died in World War II, and more than 67,000 were wounded.
(1)
(0)
Sgt Frank Rinchich
Also the question could come up as to why the Army was not on Iwo Jima, Okinawa, and a few other pacific islands, same as Marines, they were busy with Normandy .We each had our jobs and we did them , we have the greatest Army in the World, And the Marines, we don't question why, we get our orders and carry them out, if we were sent to Normandy we would have taken that to.
(0)
(0)
SGT(P) Joe Zitzelberger
Sgt Frank Rinchich - Errrr, there was an Army regiment on Iwo Jima -- Ohio National Guard IIRC -- and most of the Okinawa troops were Army. Just sayin...
(0)
(0)
Sgt Frank Rinchich
you are just sayin. the Marines that died on Okinawa was just there to only help out the Army and Okinawa troops. ok good judgment on your part. probably was on the other islands to do the same. three cheers for the Ohio national guard.
(0)
(0)
if my history memory serves me well the Marine Corps was busy fighting off a fierce enemy, in the island hopping campaign against the Japanese and I think such a large movement of troops from the Pacific campaign to the European theater would have alerted Hitler that an invasion was coming and it would have basically eliminated the purpose of having the Army do it which was the element of surprise
(1)
(0)
Japan. Pure and simple, the Marines were busy island hoping their way across the Pacific Theater. While true soldiers trained in amphibious assault would have been a better tool for the invasion of Normandy, they were a necessary tool for pushing the Japanese back in the Pacific.
(1)
(0)
SFC Charles S.
Damn Skippy. Â Â I had three uncles who were Marines and a Navy Corpsman. they had their hands full.
(1)
(0)
(0)
(0)
The Marines were already involved with the landings in the Pacific theater and due to operational tempo, could not spare large units for the landings at Normandy and Anzio. Marine amphib doctrine, however, was utilized for planning the amphibious landings at Normandy and Anzio.
(1)
(0)
Because the Marines were being deploy on the Pacific front and remove the Marine and stag them off the Coast of Normandy would have alerted the German s.
(1)
(0)
Read This Next


D-Day
