Would you obey an illegal or unconstitutional order?

Simply put - No!

This isn't even a discussion. It's black and white. It is every servicemember's duty to not obey illegal orders. Especially an order that is such a blatant violation of the constitution. Even if I suffered consequences of it from leadership who agreed with the order, at least I know I did the right thing. We swear an oath to the constitution, not the president, and we swear to carry out and obey lawful orders.

I believe, given the circumstances, I would obey the order and seek justification later. Blatently disobeying a direct order can get one shot. I would not comply with an order to fire, for example, on unarmed civilians, without a convincing explanation. Much depends on the circumstances.

No

Okay, who is Judah Freed and why is he on RP without a status indicator?

Only if there is definitive proof That the election itself was a fraud in order to take power and control of the government . because That would be an insurrection from within . But i Naively think there would be a true and fair investigation and if evidence was allowed to be presented and it was proven fraud did in fact undermine the election the legislature would invalidate the election tighten and plug the holes and hold another True and fair election . Eliminating as much fraud as possible for the good of the Country and it's voting system . And Not ignore the fraud to protect a false impression of a secured process . Because that would only serve the interest of the people committing the fraud . And encourage more of the same in the future . Because with out consequences you will surely get more of the same and it will only get worse . But then whether or not it was Constitutional or not would be questionable . based on opinion or ideology And up to the courts to decide .

Obviously someone is trying to make a political statement here pointed at President Trump. First what constitutes an unlawful order? Is the order one that violates our God Given Rights Guaranteed by Our Constitution? It does not matter who gives the order it is whether or not the order is Constitutional. It does not matter who the Commander in Chief is at the time. If the order is given and is not in violation of our Constitution who decides whether it is "Lawful or Unlawful"? Is it something that the Supreme Court will need to decide on?
We are a Constitutional Republic and our Constitution is the Law of the Land and has served us well over 2 centuries plus.
So in my opinion if the order does not violate our Constitutional Rights then we must presume it to be a lawful order until decided otherwise.
This is a slippery slope we are dealing with here.

Vital topic? No US President has ever given such an order and the only people who are bringing up this ridiculous premise are know-nothing, liberal ass clowns, so why is it a vital topic?

Would that be an order like harris coming for your guns or sleepy placing mandatory double masks mandates on the American people, is that the kind of orders that you will protect?
I'm just asking, cause I don't care if they are Republicans or Democrats they don't give a shit about you or me. And media is going to portray it the best way that the can to make money from it while taking money from whichever is paying the most.
You want to find out if I will or will not, come onto my property.

One the first things I learned in the UCMJ course of study in Army ROTC 45 years ago was the right to refuse an unlawful or immoral order. The situation referred to in class was what led to the My Lai massacre during the Vietnam War. Other lesser examples were also covered. The point is that if you are sure it’s unlawful or immoral, refuse the order. But be advised that you will probably face Court Martial to prove it, unless the person giving the order backs down or rescinds the order.