Would you obey an illegal or unconstitutional order?

Our oaths were/are to defend the Constitution.

UCMJ Articles 90, 91, 92 require obedience to all lawful orders. Not only should an unlawful order not be obeyed, obeying such an order can result in criminal prosecution. Military courts have long held that military members are accountable for their actions even while following orders. "I was following orders," is not a defense. All that being said, you better be on the right side of the issue.

Well, the first thing we need to clear off the deck is the issue of the Insurrection Act. That Act is constitutional and may be invoked by the President. Now, is the Insurrection Act being properly applied? In my rarefied judicial and constitutional knowledge, I believe that the President would be in error. Now, the military is controlled by the civilian leadership not the other way around. It is not our job to second guess decisions for obvious reasons. Martial Law is a tool that would be used when the entire nation has lost all governmental control and law and order across the nation. Again, wrong tool. We are now placed in a decision conundrum that soldiers faced in 1860 when General Robert E. Lee and others faced the same question. Why do I say this? Because we will have to make a decision that asks each of us to decide was the election fair or not, and was the President given all avenues of appeal or not. If you side with the President, then you are a "Confederate" so-to-speak. If you believe the President got fair treatment, then you are a Unionist. Note: This is why President Trump did not exercise either option because it would be the start of another Civil War. Now, when considering other orders given by a superior knowing they are illegal I'd have to disobey and inform the next in the chain of my decision.

If you plan on disobeying an order because you believe it's illegal or unconstitutional...be sure you really understand the law or the constitution. What you personally think won't really matter if you can't back it up with precedent, references, and specifics of how you tried to obey as much of the order as possible without crossing the line. On the other hand, you are responsible if you knowingly obey an unlawful order.

Simply put - No!

This isn't even a discussion. It's black and white. It is every servicemember's duty to not obey illegal orders. Especially an order that is such a blatant violation of the constitution. Even if I suffered consequences of it from leadership who agreed with the order, at least I know I did the right thing. We swear an oath to the constitution, not the president, and we swear to carry out and obey lawful orders.

I believe, given the circumstances, I would obey the order and seek justification later. Blatently disobeying a direct order can get one shot. I would not comply with an order to fire, for example, on unarmed civilians, without a convincing explanation. Much depends on the circumstances.

No

Okay, who is Judah Freed and why is he on RP without a status indicator?

Only if there is definitive proof That the election itself was a fraud in order to take power and control of the government . because That would be an insurrection from within . But i Naively think there would be a true and fair investigation and if evidence was allowed to be presented and it was proven fraud did in fact undermine the election the legislature would invalidate the election tighten and plug the holes and hold another True and fair election . Eliminating as much fraud as possible for the good of the Country and it's voting system . And Not ignore the fraud to protect a false impression of a secured process . Because that would only serve the interest of the people committing the fraud . And encourage more of the same in the future . Because with out consequences you will surely get more of the same and it will only get worse . But then whether or not it was Constitutional or not would be questionable . based on opinion or ideology And up to the courts to decide .