Posted on Dec 17, 2014
SFC Michael Jackson, MBA
538K
3.26K
1.01K
808
807
1
Multicam joint
Airforce multicam
Multicam army
the closest I seen to a standard uniform for the Armed Forces was the multicam uniform when I was in Kandahar, and Air Force all wearing the uniform at one point with few deviations. Would do feel about this?
Posted in these groups: 4276e14c UniformsOfficers logo OfficersImages 20 NCOsDod color DoD
Avatar feed
Responses: 694
Votes
  • Newest
  • Oldest
  • Votes
Liz Hodges Flores
0
0
0
IT DENTIFIES ALL U.S. ARMFORCES UNIFORM CODE !!!!-!!!!-!!!!-!!!!
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
Lt Col Nurse Anesthetist
0
0
0
I think we need to go back to a single utility uniform, like we had until the USMC developed MARPAT (then the Army tried to say "hold my beer" and failed with the ACUs). Furthermore, we need to let the combat arms professionals (infantry, special ops, etc) design the uniform... not the desk jockeys who place form over function.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CW3 Greg Donovan
0
0
0
Good idea. I'm partial to multicam, myself. And a hat with a brim. Give SOF types their berets back, if they want them.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CW3 Greg Donovan
0
0
0
We're not talking about making fashion statements. One good, versatile uniform that would serve our fighters under any circumstances would simply logistics and reduce costs. They can use hats and patches to enhance identification. Save the fashion statements for dress uniforms.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Intelligence Analyst
0
0
0
This would reduce cost! One uniform for all
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SPC Geospatial Engineer
0
0
0
Awesome idea just no Velcro
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SrA Paul Pfeil
0
0
0
I am torn here. Battle dress makes sense based on theater and mission not branch. Dress uniform definitely should remain separated. Good luck getting marines to give up their blood strip or letting others wear it.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Stephanie Mitchell
0
0
0
Imagine how much money the military would save. I remember when we all wore BDU's.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
LT Charles Baird
0
0
0
As long as it's not the Army one we wore in Afghanistan - that was extremely uncomfortable and did not feel like a uniform; it felt more like pajamas
(0)
Comment
(0)
CDR Michael Goldschmidt
CDR Michael Goldschmidt
8 y
I'm not sure I know which one you mean. Do you mean DCUs?
(0)
Reply
(0)
LT Charles Baird
LT Charles Baird
8 y
38a70351
CDR Michael Goldschmidt - This one was uncomfortable
(0)
Reply
(0)
CDR Michael Goldschmidt
CDR Michael Goldschmidt
8 y
LT Charles Baird - I can't comment, because I never wore that one. I was in Afghanistan in 2003. Say hi to Cheatham Annex for me. I live in Williamsburg when I was a LT, 1989-1993, but never had access to Cheatham.
(0)
Reply
(0)
LT Charles Baird
LT Charles Baird
8 y
CDR Michael Goldschmidt - You didn't miss much there really isn't anything there but NAVELSG
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
PO2 Ray Michalak
0
0
0
After wearing the Navy's blue cammies I would say yes.....no reason we shouldn't all be in the same utility uniform all the time. Service and dress uniforms should always be service specific, however.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Former Rn
0
0
0
I feel it IS about time for a standard one for all 5 branches, but since there are so many 1-4 star Generals across ALL branches and they are all buckin for the 'next' star, this will never happen.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
Charlie Matthias
0
0
0
This is probably the most asinine thing I have ever read or heard of coming from someone in the military!!!! All countries issue their military branches different uniforms for many reasons; the least of which is to distinguish them from each other!!!! Most military uniforms have historical context that represent the continuity of the uniform and the branch itself!!!

As for the camouflage; maybe it could be justified if it meets the individual mission requirements of each branch of service, but remember that they were changed in the first place because each branch needed and wanted different patterns and styles for their personnel!!!!

The old adage "if it is not broken do not fix it" comes to mind!!!!

Stop trying to change the military!!!!

It is fine the way it is!!!!
(0)
Comment
(0)
CDR Michael Goldschmidt
CDR Michael Goldschmidt
8 y
For those with memories, it wasn't broken before the services tried to fix it.
(0)
Reply
(0)
CDR Michael Goldschmidt
CDR Michael Goldschmidt
8 y
Also interesting that at Civilian would be telling military people to stop trying to fix the military, and the military is fine the way it is. That's based on your military experience? Where to you think the term SNAFU came from?
(0)
Reply
(0)
MCPO Roger Collins
MCPO Roger Collins
8 y
CDR Michael Goldschmidt - That has occurred to me on more frequent occasions that ever based on the new civilian adds to RP.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSgt Christopher Gilbert
0
0
0
I like the idea
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CSM Chris McKeown
0
0
0
I have to say hell NO! Different uniforms between the different branches is good for morale on so many levels. Also different uniforms helps during large campaigns like Desert Storm so you know which branch of service you are seeing and dealing with. Many a time during Desert Shield/Storm I would come across troops in remote areas and would call in to report what I was seeing to make sure they were what ever branch of the US Forces and that they were authorized to be in that area.

Also if every branch has the same uniform it is easier for enemy forces to impersonate and gain a major advantage on us both abroad and here in the US.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
PO3 Chris Scheide
0
0
0
Seagoing services, Navy and Coast Guard, shouldn't have to wear camo. As a Machinery Technician I like our working blues or dungarees w/ a chambray shirt. I like what others have said about keeping the service specific dress uniforms. Lets each service keeps its identity.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSgt Jamie Ritter LeBlanc
0
0
0
Uh no there have been enough uniform changes. I honestly didn't see the need for the change before in roughly 2007. Me personally it is a waste of time and money for the changes. Only time it should change is for the mission. JMHO
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGT John Fritz
0
0
0
Doesn't the uniform requirement have to fit the needs on the specific mission? More so the environment that they will be going to to defend us.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
COL John Hudson
0
0
0
Chief, and ALLCON: I was at the last combined LOGEX held at Fort Picket back in the day. A Joint Field Ex - we had Canadian military types with us as well. They shared with us the Canadian military tried that very idea, and it was the biggest "Recruiting" disaster ever in the history of the Canadian armed forces. Young people wanting to become engaged in a specific aspect of any of the armed forces sought to be recognized by the roll-specific uniforms for that area. Turning off that inducement, exchanging it for a 'one-size-fits-all' vanilla outfit, choked off their enlistment numbers in a heartbeat. Senior military leaders couldn't get that turned off quick enough. U.S. common uniform? Didn't work for the Canadians and I REALLY don't believe it would work for us!
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Victor Pontbriand
0
0
0
Stupid idea
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
PO1 N4 Lpo
0
0
0
No way. Love my NWUs.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.