Posted on Jun 25, 2016
The National Guard is coming to a dangerous crossroads, incoming chief warns
15.2K
24
10
13
13
0
The National Guard Bureau's incoming chief warned senators this week about the department’s end strength, calling it “high risk” and suggesting that expected cuts in coming years could present significant national security challenges.
Lt. Gen Joseph Lengyel, who currently serves as the National Guard's vice chief, told members of the Senate Armed Services Committee on Tuesday that the 342,000 Army National Guard members and the 105,500 Air National Guard personnel are barely enough to cover potential demand on the force.
At any time, about 4,000 of them are mobilized. Since 2001, guardsmen have mobilized more than 780,000 times in support of the wars overseas, not including other foreign contingency demands.
“As you aggregate the threats, it becomes difficult to fight Korea, fight Russian and fight counter-terrorism,” he said. “The risk is high.”
And that risk will only rise in coming years, he said, if budget caps on defense spending push down the numbers even further.
“Sequestration would devastate the ability to generate forces and maintain readiness across the force,” he said.
Earlier this year, House lawmakers passed a plan to grow the Army Guard next year to 350,000 soldiers, in opposition to the White House plan to cut it down to 335,000 in fiscal 2017.
But funding for those extra troops was provided only for one year, and Senate backers were unable to build support for a similar boost in their annual authorization bill draft.
Even without extra troops, Lengyel said he sees opportunities to help the active-duty force with a variety of security responsibilities, including cyber security missions and logistics support.
“On the Air Force side, I would tell you that we are embedded routinely, regularly deployed,” he said. “On the Army, the last 15 years of fighting wars has [made] the Army National Guard a very capable force that I believe has excess capacity to provide more regular and routine deployments.”
But doing that may require changes in mobilization rules.
Current law requires a waiver for any mobilization assignment over 1,095 days. Lengyel said for some assignments — including drone pilots and intelligence missions — that limit has caused grief for Guard planners.
He told senators that if he is confirmed in his new role, he’ll lobby lawmakers for new rules covering those missions.
That confirmation could come in the next three weeks. Lawmakers on the committee expressed unofficial support for Lengyel to take over the role as soon as possible, and are hoping for a full Senate vote on his confirmation before Congress breaks for the summer on July 15.
Lt. Gen Joseph Lengyel, who currently serves as the National Guard's vice chief, told members of the Senate Armed Services Committee on Tuesday that the 342,000 Army National Guard members and the 105,500 Air National Guard personnel are barely enough to cover potential demand on the force.
At any time, about 4,000 of them are mobilized. Since 2001, guardsmen have mobilized more than 780,000 times in support of the wars overseas, not including other foreign contingency demands.
“As you aggregate the threats, it becomes difficult to fight Korea, fight Russian and fight counter-terrorism,” he said. “The risk is high.”
And that risk will only rise in coming years, he said, if budget caps on defense spending push down the numbers even further.
“Sequestration would devastate the ability to generate forces and maintain readiness across the force,” he said.
Earlier this year, House lawmakers passed a plan to grow the Army Guard next year to 350,000 soldiers, in opposition to the White House plan to cut it down to 335,000 in fiscal 2017.
But funding for those extra troops was provided only for one year, and Senate backers were unable to build support for a similar boost in their annual authorization bill draft.
Even without extra troops, Lengyel said he sees opportunities to help the active-duty force with a variety of security responsibilities, including cyber security missions and logistics support.
“On the Air Force side, I would tell you that we are embedded routinely, regularly deployed,” he said. “On the Army, the last 15 years of fighting wars has [made] the Army National Guard a very capable force that I believe has excess capacity to provide more regular and routine deployments.”
But doing that may require changes in mobilization rules.
Current law requires a waiver for any mobilization assignment over 1,095 days. Lengyel said for some assignments — including drone pilots and intelligence missions — that limit has caused grief for Guard planners.
He told senators that if he is confirmed in his new role, he’ll lobby lawmakers for new rules covering those missions.
That confirmation could come in the next three weeks. Lawmakers on the committee expressed unofficial support for Lengyel to take over the role as soon as possible, and are hoping for a full Senate vote on his confirmation before Congress breaks for the summer on July 15.
The National Guard is coming to a dangerous crossroads, incoming chief warns
Posted from armytimes.comPosted in these groups: Army National Guard
Posted 8 y ago
Responses: 8
Posted 8 y ago
I believe the Pentagon understands the demands and $ constraints on the Guard! Too bad congress needs to have it spelled out!
(3)
Comment
(0)
(1)
Reply
(0)
SFC Melvin Brandenburg
5 y
Personally I see a problem with the difficulty of getting prepared soldiers to NCOES such as SLC due to funding issues. We could better utilize technologies such as podcasts or blended cooperative assignments and teleconferencing for some MOSs. As we lose senior NCOs there is a choke point in the pipeline for guard soldiers.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Posted 8 y ago
Thanks for sharing the news that "Lt. Gen Joseph Lengyel, who currently serves as the National Guard's vice chief, told members of the Senate Armed Services Committee on Tuesday that the 342,000 Army National Guard members and the 105,500 Air National Guard personnel are barely enough to cover potential demand on the force." SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL
I certainly concur with him. The demand on the guard and reserve forces since 9-11-2001 has been extraordinary and well beyond what was expected when they were established or when their roles and call up requirements were modified after the Vietnam war ended.
I certainly concur with him. The demand on the guard and reserve forces since 9-11-2001 has been extraordinary and well beyond what was expected when they were established or when their roles and call up requirements were modified after the Vietnam war ended.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Edited 8 y ago
Posted 8 y ago
Yet the $160 billion wasted on the F-35 defects would have helped the ARNG be at where it should be not where it is!
http://www.businessinsider.com/f-35-cost-2014-2
http://www.businessinsider.com/f-35-cost-2014-2
Why Is The US Military Spending So Much Money On The F-35 Fighter Jet?
The jet has been plagued with delays and technical problems.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Read This Next