Posted on Sep 11, 2015
Marine Corps Times
22.8K
115
65
7
7
0
From: Marine Corps Times

Navy Secretary Ray Mabus has doubled down on his assertion that all combat jobs should be opened to women in the wake of a new study showing that all-male Marine control groups outperformed those with women in nearly every infantry task.

Mabus spoke to David Greene at NPR a day after Marine officials revealed findings from a nine-month infantry experiment that assessed the performance of male and female Marine volunteers during physically demanding ground combat tasks. A summary of data showed that mixed-gender teams completed tasks more slowly and shot with less accuracy, and that women sustained injuries at more than twice the rate of their male counterparts.

In his radio interview, Mabus suggested the Marines' study was flawed due to the caliber and mindset of the volunteer participants.

"It started out with a fairly large component of the men thinking 'this is not a good idea,' and 'women will never be able to do this,' " Mabus said. "When you start out with that mindset, you're almost presupposing the outcome."

Mabus also said the Marines could have selected female volunteers who were better suited to the task of marching under heavy loads, which accounted for many of the injuries that were observed.

"For the women that volunteered, probably there should have been a higher bar to cross to get into the experiment," he said.

Female volunteers, except for a small "provisional infantry" group, were required to graduate from the Marines' entry-level enlisted infantry training course and specific combat job schools, if applicable. They also had to get at least a third-class score on the male version of the Marine Corps' Physical Fitness Test, requiring three pullups, 50 crunches in one minute, and a 3-mile run in 28 minutes.

In a Pentagon briefing Thursday, however, officials said the female Marines who volunteered tended to be athletic, with high scores on the PFT and combat fitness tests.

"These were good Marines," said Paul Johnson, the principal investigator for the integrated task force experiment.

Despite the disappointment he expressed with the study, Mabus said it did reveal ways to set entry-level performance standards for each infantry job in order to mitigate injury risks and control for male and female Marines who are likely to execute physical tasks successfully.

"When you look at some of the outside analysis of this from the Center for Naval Analyses, they've looked at these and they've said there are ways to mitigate this so you can have the same combat effectiveness, the same lethality. Which is crucial," Mabus said.

That CNA study has yet to be released publicly.

Mabus' remarks come on the verge of a crucial decision for the Marine Corps: whether to ask to keep certain ground combat jobs closed to women to preserve combat effectiveness, or to move forward with integrating female Marines into every infantry specialty. Commandant Gen. Joseph Dunford has not revealed his thinking on the matter ahead of a final decision. Mabus, however, has been vocal about his plans to work toward full gender integration.

"That's ... my call," he told Military Times this month about the upcoming decision.

http://www.marinecorpstimes.com/story/military/2015/09/11/secnav-criticizes-marines-infantry-study-interview/72059308/
Posted in these groups: Ega Marine CorpsNavy NavyInfantry_branch_insignia_photo_cards-r4ae815fac115412683e3bff623b4440b_vgjpz_8byvr_512 Infantry
Avatar_feed
Responses: 30
MSgt Erik Copp
17
17
0
He won't have to pay for "his call" IF things don't work out. He needs to listen to the war fighters. I am not against integration when it is smart to do so. But to integrate just to be able to say "I made that happen" (which is how it looks to me), is a bad idea.
Just my opinion.
(17)
Comment
(0)
LCDR Rabbah Rona Matlow
LCDR Rabbah Rona Matlow
4 y
MSgt Erik Copp = my thoughts exactly. If someone can't meet mission readiness without changing the standards, they have no business in that particular mission, irrespective of gender, race, etc... Marine Infantry isn't the only force where this will be an issue. How many women will be able to qualify as SEALS for instance? It took the two women who passed Ranger Basic two or more tries to get through, and UDT is harder than RB...

Let's say I'm concerned. My brother is a career firefighter, and he's seen standards lowered for Affirmative Action, which only endangers the public they serve...
(3)
Reply
(0)
PO2 Brian Rhodes
PO2 Brian Rhodes
4 y
Two thumbs up on the POTUS legacy point LtCol Matthew Sutton
(2)
Reply
(0)
PO1 Glenn Boucher
PO1 Glenn Boucher
4 y
MSgt Erik Copp, your absolutely correct.
Do it properly make sure standards are not changed. Do not do it for political agendas to make people feel good and then in a few years say that "I accomplished that" in a memoir.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar_small
PO2 Jonathan Scharff
7
7
0
Leave it to the government to "forge ahead" inspite of the facts. Nothing really new here...
(7)
Comment
(0)
Avatar_small
LCDR Deputy Department Head
6
6
0
I think the article is very interesting. While Secretary Mabus may be correct about biases being introduced, the study being released and his criticism of it will come under a lot of scrutiny.
(6)
Comment
(0)
Avatar_small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close
Seg?add=7750261&t=2