Posted on Jun 8, 2021
Biden, lawmakers highlight inclusion of LGBTQ service members and Veterans
38.6K
546
152
216
216
0
As June’s Pride month kicked off, the Biden Administration and lawmakers in Congress highlighted efforts to be more inclusive of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer persons in the military and Veteran communities, addressing years of past discrimination and countering new restrictions of LGBTQ rights.
Department of Defense (DOD) Press Secretary John F. Kirby, speaking to reporters earlier this month, honored the “the service, commitment, and sacrifice of our LGBTQ personnel in and out of uniform.”
He said that one of Lloyd J. Austin III’s first actions as defense secretary was implementing President Joe Biden’s Jan. 25, 2021, executive order to ensure that eligible transgender persons can serve in the military openly and free from discrimination. Biden’s order also provided a path for service members to access gender-affirming medical care.
Kirby added that the DOD under Austin’s leadership is taking “concerted action” to promote and protect LGBTQ human rights around the globe.
Responding to a reporter’s question, Kirby defended diversity and inclusion in the U.S. military from recent political attacks. Texas Rep. Dan Crenshaw and Arkansas Sen. Tom Cotton, both Republicans, have labeled such efforts “woke ideology.”
Kirby said protecting the nation requires attracting talented volunteers to serve on — and service — aircrafts, crews and warships, and he said DOD leaders make “no apologies” for ensuring an inclusive workplace.
“If you (meet) the standards and you’re qualified to be in the military,” he said, “we want you to be able to do it free of hate and fear and discrimination.”
Inclusion is a work in progress
For the roughly 16% of active female service members and 5% of male service members who identified in a 2018 DOD survey as lesbian, gay, bisexual or some other sexual orientation, Kirby conceded these efforts are a work in progress. Indicators across several areas bear this out, both for LGBTQ personnel serving now and the estimated 1 million LGBTQ Veterans.
Military sexual assault: For instance, a RAND report released June 1, 2021, found that active duty service members who identify as lesbian, gay or bisexual or who did not identify as heterosexual are sexually assaulted at disproportionate rates. Yet DOD rarely examines this issue, the report said.
RAND researchers analyzed 2016 and 2018 data from workplace and gender relations surveys of active duty members. The data showed that lesbian, gay, bisexual or nonidentifying-as-heterosexual service members represented 12% of the active population. However, they were 44% and 43% of all sexually assaulted service members in 2016 and 2018, respectively. (The survey doesn’t ask about transgender identification at all.)
“These statistics demonstrate that assaults on the minority of service members who do not describe themselves as heterosexual constitute almost half of all service members who were sexually assaulted in each of these years,” the authors said in the report. “However, we have seen little focus on sexual assaults against LGB service members in DoD prevention materials, research, or public discussion of sexual assault in the military.”
The report recommended DOD improve data collection to understand sexual assault of LGB service members and develop more inclusive sexual assault prevention strategies and materials.
Compensation and benefits: LGBTQ advocates have long argued that policies such as “don’t ask, don’t tell,” in place from 1994-2011, and the recently reversed Trans Military Ban resulted in many harms, including the wrongful discharge from the military and denial of benefits from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).
A commission is needed to study the historic and ongoing impacts of discrimination against LGBTQ service members and Veterans, argued Rep. Mark Takano, the California Democrat who chairs the House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs. He introduced legislation to establish a panel that would hear testimony from service members and Veterans and their families, advocacy organizations and government agencies and issue remedial recommendations.
“Establishing this commission would help Americans understand the effects of anti-LGBTQ military policies, provide a path forward to rectify the injustices, and help create a welcoming culture for LGBTQ servicemembers and Veterans in the military and at VA,” Takano said.
In February, VA announced a wide-ranging review of services provided to LGBTQ Veterans and employees to ensure equity in delivery of medical and gender-affirmation care and procedures. In announcing this policy review, officials reminded LGBT Veterans that care coordinators are present at every VA facility. They can provide LGBT Veterans with access to primary care services, including hormone treatment and HIV prevention services such as PrEP.
Transgender health care: Another bill introduced in the House would prevent DOD from stationing service members who have transgender dependents in states or countries that prohibit or deny them gender-affirming health care and treatment, according to a statement by Rep. Jimmy Panetta, Democrat of California, lead sponsor of the legislation. At the state level, more than 20 new anti-LGBTQ laws have passed this year, many aimed at transgender people, according to the Human Rights Campaign.
Learn more
Biden’s Pride Month proclamation: https://rly.pt/352sgKp
DOD’s policy on military service by transgender persons: https://rly.pt/2TH9LZq
List of VA programs for Veterans who are LGBTQ: https://www.va.gov/initiatives/recognizing-lgbtq-veterans-during-pride-month.
Panetta’s news release: https://panetta.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-panetta-introduces-legislation-protect-transgender-military.
Pentagon press briefing transcript from June 1: https://rly.pt/2T6FRgY
RAND’s Sexual Assault of Sexual Minorities in the U.S. Military: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA1390-1.html.
Takano’s news release: https://rly.pt/355Wqw5
Department of Defense (DOD) Press Secretary John F. Kirby, speaking to reporters earlier this month, honored the “the service, commitment, and sacrifice of our LGBTQ personnel in and out of uniform.”
He said that one of Lloyd J. Austin III’s first actions as defense secretary was implementing President Joe Biden’s Jan. 25, 2021, executive order to ensure that eligible transgender persons can serve in the military openly and free from discrimination. Biden’s order also provided a path for service members to access gender-affirming medical care.
Kirby added that the DOD under Austin’s leadership is taking “concerted action” to promote and protect LGBTQ human rights around the globe.
Responding to a reporter’s question, Kirby defended diversity and inclusion in the U.S. military from recent political attacks. Texas Rep. Dan Crenshaw and Arkansas Sen. Tom Cotton, both Republicans, have labeled such efforts “woke ideology.”
Kirby said protecting the nation requires attracting talented volunteers to serve on — and service — aircrafts, crews and warships, and he said DOD leaders make “no apologies” for ensuring an inclusive workplace.
“If you (meet) the standards and you’re qualified to be in the military,” he said, “we want you to be able to do it free of hate and fear and discrimination.”
Inclusion is a work in progress
For the roughly 16% of active female service members and 5% of male service members who identified in a 2018 DOD survey as lesbian, gay, bisexual or some other sexual orientation, Kirby conceded these efforts are a work in progress. Indicators across several areas bear this out, both for LGBTQ personnel serving now and the estimated 1 million LGBTQ Veterans.
Military sexual assault: For instance, a RAND report released June 1, 2021, found that active duty service members who identify as lesbian, gay or bisexual or who did not identify as heterosexual are sexually assaulted at disproportionate rates. Yet DOD rarely examines this issue, the report said.
RAND researchers analyzed 2016 and 2018 data from workplace and gender relations surveys of active duty members. The data showed that lesbian, gay, bisexual or nonidentifying-as-heterosexual service members represented 12% of the active population. However, they were 44% and 43% of all sexually assaulted service members in 2016 and 2018, respectively. (The survey doesn’t ask about transgender identification at all.)
“These statistics demonstrate that assaults on the minority of service members who do not describe themselves as heterosexual constitute almost half of all service members who were sexually assaulted in each of these years,” the authors said in the report. “However, we have seen little focus on sexual assaults against LGB service members in DoD prevention materials, research, or public discussion of sexual assault in the military.”
The report recommended DOD improve data collection to understand sexual assault of LGB service members and develop more inclusive sexual assault prevention strategies and materials.
Compensation and benefits: LGBTQ advocates have long argued that policies such as “don’t ask, don’t tell,” in place from 1994-2011, and the recently reversed Trans Military Ban resulted in many harms, including the wrongful discharge from the military and denial of benefits from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).
A commission is needed to study the historic and ongoing impacts of discrimination against LGBTQ service members and Veterans, argued Rep. Mark Takano, the California Democrat who chairs the House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs. He introduced legislation to establish a panel that would hear testimony from service members and Veterans and their families, advocacy organizations and government agencies and issue remedial recommendations.
“Establishing this commission would help Americans understand the effects of anti-LGBTQ military policies, provide a path forward to rectify the injustices, and help create a welcoming culture for LGBTQ servicemembers and Veterans in the military and at VA,” Takano said.
In February, VA announced a wide-ranging review of services provided to LGBTQ Veterans and employees to ensure equity in delivery of medical and gender-affirmation care and procedures. In announcing this policy review, officials reminded LGBT Veterans that care coordinators are present at every VA facility. They can provide LGBT Veterans with access to primary care services, including hormone treatment and HIV prevention services such as PrEP.
Transgender health care: Another bill introduced in the House would prevent DOD from stationing service members who have transgender dependents in states or countries that prohibit or deny them gender-affirming health care and treatment, according to a statement by Rep. Jimmy Panetta, Democrat of California, lead sponsor of the legislation. At the state level, more than 20 new anti-LGBTQ laws have passed this year, many aimed at transgender people, according to the Human Rights Campaign.
Learn more
Biden’s Pride Month proclamation: https://rly.pt/352sgKp
DOD’s policy on military service by transgender persons: https://rly.pt/2TH9LZq
List of VA programs for Veterans who are LGBTQ: https://www.va.gov/initiatives/recognizing-lgbtq-veterans-during-pride-month.
Panetta’s news release: https://panetta.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-panetta-introduces-legislation-protect-transgender-military.
Pentagon press briefing transcript from June 1: https://rly.pt/2T6FRgY
RAND’s Sexual Assault of Sexual Minorities in the U.S. Military: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA1390-1.html.
Takano’s news release: https://rly.pt/355Wqw5
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 36
1SG John Millan
At least Biden had his priorities straight I mean, we wouldn’t wanna mess with weapons Training combative new weapon systems field training exercises, and being warriors. Some people actually wonder why people got fed up with this bullshit.
(0)
(0)
1SG John Millan
Lloyd Austin should’ve been impeached and possibly even recall back in court. Marshal is a retired general for dereliction of duty and treason for going under the knife and general anesthetic and not telling anybody. We lucked out and not having a major military incident or we would’ve been flapping in the wind. Another fucking reason why I hate liberals.
(0)
(0)
I really don’t think anyone really cares abut veterans I’m 100% three different heart diseases because of agent orange all I get is there is nothing we the VA can do, no matter what war right or wrong we served with honor and should get more than just care we should get nothing but the best
(3)
(0)
SFC(P) (Join to see)
You deserve far more than an illegal alien is getting in the way of medical services and more money than them, but your getting neither.
(0)
(0)
SGT (Join to see)
Are you on the Agent Orange registry ? Are you service connected? Have you attended any of the PACT ACT clinic's run by your local VA. Just what if anything have you attempted to rectify your situation .
(0)
(0)
With WWIII in the horizon, why the DoD will spend millions with this bullsh*t. We are the laughing stock of the world.
(3)
(0)
SFC(P) (Join to see)
Politics, power and money. It's a distraction and supports the base of the Left
(2)
(0)
SPC Clark Stinson
Yes indeed. Other countries still have their shortcomings, yet they see what's going on in the USA overall and see that they aren't in that of a hot mess.
(0)
(0)
Folks in Joe Biden's party were upset when President Trump made it a priotiy to support gay rights not only in the US, but to insist that other countries did not have the right to kill people for being gay. I guess it is okay now that the Bad Orange Man isn't saying it. Of course, he was also the first American president to go into office saying that he was okay with same-sex marriages, so...
As far as this particular puff piece, there hasn't really been a lot of controversy about gay, lesbian or bi people being in the military, since that has literally no effect on being combat effective. It reminds me a bit of the "don't ask, don't tell" stuff President Clinton tossed out there. It wasn't really changing much, but it let him put his name on something and it didn't hurt, so...
The controversial bit iof the LG+++++ is the part that was added into the grouping for political purposes: Trans... anything actually requiring extensive medication/surgery for an ongoing basis, leaving aside whether you think it is a legitimate thing or not, means you are no longer someone who can be counted on to do what is needed when it is needed. I was already long out when I became an insulin-dependent diabetic, but it still made me sad that it absolutely meant I could not be an effective soldier if we were ever desperate enough for a beat up old medic to be needed.
Of course, there are still folks who legitimately believe we are dealing with gender dysphoria here and not merely a need to put up rainbow flags and tell everyone "I'm okay, you're okay," but those folks will be shouted down anyways since those who have the power at the moment are in no way interested in actual discussion one way or the other.
As far as this particular puff piece, there hasn't really been a lot of controversy about gay, lesbian or bi people being in the military, since that has literally no effect on being combat effective. It reminds me a bit of the "don't ask, don't tell" stuff President Clinton tossed out there. It wasn't really changing much, but it let him put his name on something and it didn't hurt, so...
The controversial bit iof the LG+++++ is the part that was added into the grouping for political purposes: Trans... anything actually requiring extensive medication/surgery for an ongoing basis, leaving aside whether you think it is a legitimate thing or not, means you are no longer someone who can be counted on to do what is needed when it is needed. I was already long out when I became an insulin-dependent diabetic, but it still made me sad that it absolutely meant I could not be an effective soldier if we were ever desperate enough for a beat up old medic to be needed.
Of course, there are still folks who legitimately believe we are dealing with gender dysphoria here and not merely a need to put up rainbow flags and tell everyone "I'm okay, you're okay," but those folks will be shouted down anyways since those who have the power at the moment are in no way interested in actual discussion one way or the other.
(3)
(0)
Now, I'm not going to say that the following incident occurred, but.... IF, years ago, a gay soldier had made unwanted advancements in the shower, and IF I had turned the hot water on him, then WHO was the aggressor? Maybe if I was a member of some "offended" group, I could have gone crying to the Commanding Officer. As it was, the matter was settled "Out of Court". THAT is probably a reason why the "statistics" are so skewed in one direction.
(3)
(0)
MSG Lonnie Averkamp
This was prior to February 28, 1994. Perhaps, it would have been better if I had him put up for an Undesirable Discharge, and wear THAT around his neck for the rest of his life.
(2)
(0)
SFC Robert Walton
SPC Robert Conway - NO Wrong They were both Soldiers. The person that is the aggressor Is guilty of unwanted Sexual assault. The second was SELF DEFENSE against SEXUAL ASSAULT. KEEP YOUR HANDS TO YOUR SELF YOU HAVE PHSICALLY ASSULTED ANOTHER SOLDIER. I am pretty sure they do not teach shower groping anywhere in the Military. However they still teach self defense.
(0)
(0)
SFC(P) (Join to see)
Gays sexually harass gays. They go after each other and account for the majority of harassment cases.
(1)
(0)
(0)
(0)
(1)
(0)
SFC Robert Walton
PFC David Foster - I don't see them as equal rights i have see people discharge from the army with fixable issues but cost and lack of being deployable erased any chance of getting fix on the job but LGBTQ can just join up and get plenty of health care money spent to change them physically WOW can we say lopsided benefits? Dependent health care stopped because cost. Whitey is inherently racist this was posted about so the whole conversation has imploded into (we got to get whitey in line.) MT
(1)
(0)
PFC David Foster
SFC Robert Walton - I'm sorry fella, I can't make any sense of your argument. I wish everyone well though.... As far as I'm concerned, I have the same rights to the next person in line, no matter their skin color, sexual preference, or gender.
(2)
(0)
Conservatives have been trying to destroy this for thousands of years. While I must applaud their stick to it-ness. Give it up Jack, you failed.
(3)
(0)
Suspended Profile
Really thousands of years?
SFC(P) (Join to see)
Conservatives + thousands of year? Hilarious... The public voted overwhelmingly to stop and not to acknowledge gay marriage. It was forced through the Supreme court. Why do the rest of us need to acknowledge and support your sexual choices? Why does 95% of the population need to accommodate 5% and bow to their extreme whims regularly? DOMA was pushed forward by both parties. No one should get a month or day to celebrate their sexuality regardless of what it is.... You be you and that's your private decision, unless you have a far bigger agenda.
(1)
(0)
Things I don't want to know or need to know about you. You're sexual preference is a private matter not a leverage. Do your job and be quiet. The Alphabet people sexually prey on each other and always have. Just like minorities kill and or assault minorities. People with mental health problems (trans) need a therapist and a mental health care professional...not hormone replacement drugs or mutilation. More political correctness and Woke garbage from DOD
(2)
(0)
These people have always been fighting beside us among the ranks. Ones sexual preference, gender, skin color, religious choice, or other individual qualities have absolutely nothing to do with their patriotism or bravery....
(2)
(0)
Read This Next


LGBTQ+
Joe Biden
Policy
Law
Veterans Affairs (VA)
