Posted on Jun 8, 2021
Biden, lawmakers highlight inclusion of LGBTQ service members and Veterans
38.6K
546
152
216
216
0
As June’s Pride month kicked off, the Biden Administration and lawmakers in Congress highlighted efforts to be more inclusive of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer persons in the military and Veteran communities, addressing years of past discrimination and countering new restrictions of LGBTQ rights.
Department of Defense (DOD) Press Secretary John F. Kirby, speaking to reporters earlier this month, honored the “the service, commitment, and sacrifice of our LGBTQ personnel in and out of uniform.”
He said that one of Lloyd J. Austin III’s first actions as defense secretary was implementing President Joe Biden’s Jan. 25, 2021, executive order to ensure that eligible transgender persons can serve in the military openly and free from discrimination. Biden’s order also provided a path for service members to access gender-affirming medical care.
Kirby added that the DOD under Austin’s leadership is taking “concerted action” to promote and protect LGBTQ human rights around the globe.
Responding to a reporter’s question, Kirby defended diversity and inclusion in the U.S. military from recent political attacks. Texas Rep. Dan Crenshaw and Arkansas Sen. Tom Cotton, both Republicans, have labeled such efforts “woke ideology.”
Kirby said protecting the nation requires attracting talented volunteers to serve on — and service — aircrafts, crews and warships, and he said DOD leaders make “no apologies” for ensuring an inclusive workplace.
“If you (meet) the standards and you’re qualified to be in the military,” he said, “we want you to be able to do it free of hate and fear and discrimination.”
Inclusion is a work in progress
For the roughly 16% of active female service members and 5% of male service members who identified in a 2018 DOD survey as lesbian, gay, bisexual or some other sexual orientation, Kirby conceded these efforts are a work in progress. Indicators across several areas bear this out, both for LGBTQ personnel serving now and the estimated 1 million LGBTQ Veterans.
Military sexual assault: For instance, a RAND report released June 1, 2021, found that active duty service members who identify as lesbian, gay or bisexual or who did not identify as heterosexual are sexually assaulted at disproportionate rates. Yet DOD rarely examines this issue, the report said.
RAND researchers analyzed 2016 and 2018 data from workplace and gender relations surveys of active duty members. The data showed that lesbian, gay, bisexual or nonidentifying-as-heterosexual service members represented 12% of the active population. However, they were 44% and 43% of all sexually assaulted service members in 2016 and 2018, respectively. (The survey doesn’t ask about transgender identification at all.)
“These statistics demonstrate that assaults on the minority of service members who do not describe themselves as heterosexual constitute almost half of all service members who were sexually assaulted in each of these years,” the authors said in the report. “However, we have seen little focus on sexual assaults against LGB service members in DoD prevention materials, research, or public discussion of sexual assault in the military.”
The report recommended DOD improve data collection to understand sexual assault of LGB service members and develop more inclusive sexual assault prevention strategies and materials.
Compensation and benefits: LGBTQ advocates have long argued that policies such as “don’t ask, don’t tell,” in place from 1994-2011, and the recently reversed Trans Military Ban resulted in many harms, including the wrongful discharge from the military and denial of benefits from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).
A commission is needed to study the historic and ongoing impacts of discrimination against LGBTQ service members and Veterans, argued Rep. Mark Takano, the California Democrat who chairs the House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs. He introduced legislation to establish a panel that would hear testimony from service members and Veterans and their families, advocacy organizations and government agencies and issue remedial recommendations.
“Establishing this commission would help Americans understand the effects of anti-LGBTQ military policies, provide a path forward to rectify the injustices, and help create a welcoming culture for LGBTQ servicemembers and Veterans in the military and at VA,” Takano said.
In February, VA announced a wide-ranging review of services provided to LGBTQ Veterans and employees to ensure equity in delivery of medical and gender-affirmation care and procedures. In announcing this policy review, officials reminded LGBT Veterans that care coordinators are present at every VA facility. They can provide LGBT Veterans with access to primary care services, including hormone treatment and HIV prevention services such as PrEP.
Transgender health care: Another bill introduced in the House would prevent DOD from stationing service members who have transgender dependents in states or countries that prohibit or deny them gender-affirming health care and treatment, according to a statement by Rep. Jimmy Panetta, Democrat of California, lead sponsor of the legislation. At the state level, more than 20 new anti-LGBTQ laws have passed this year, many aimed at transgender people, according to the Human Rights Campaign.
Learn more
Biden’s Pride Month proclamation: https://rly.pt/352sgKp
DOD’s policy on military service by transgender persons: https://rly.pt/2TH9LZq
List of VA programs for Veterans who are LGBTQ: https://www.va.gov/initiatives/recognizing-lgbtq-veterans-during-pride-month.
Panetta’s news release: https://panetta.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-panetta-introduces-legislation-protect-transgender-military.
Pentagon press briefing transcript from June 1: https://rly.pt/2T6FRgY
RAND’s Sexual Assault of Sexual Minorities in the U.S. Military: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA1390-1.html.
Takano’s news release: https://rly.pt/355Wqw5
Department of Defense (DOD) Press Secretary John F. Kirby, speaking to reporters earlier this month, honored the “the service, commitment, and sacrifice of our LGBTQ personnel in and out of uniform.”
He said that one of Lloyd J. Austin III’s first actions as defense secretary was implementing President Joe Biden’s Jan. 25, 2021, executive order to ensure that eligible transgender persons can serve in the military openly and free from discrimination. Biden’s order also provided a path for service members to access gender-affirming medical care.
Kirby added that the DOD under Austin’s leadership is taking “concerted action” to promote and protect LGBTQ human rights around the globe.
Responding to a reporter’s question, Kirby defended diversity and inclusion in the U.S. military from recent political attacks. Texas Rep. Dan Crenshaw and Arkansas Sen. Tom Cotton, both Republicans, have labeled such efforts “woke ideology.”
Kirby said protecting the nation requires attracting talented volunteers to serve on — and service — aircrafts, crews and warships, and he said DOD leaders make “no apologies” for ensuring an inclusive workplace.
“If you (meet) the standards and you’re qualified to be in the military,” he said, “we want you to be able to do it free of hate and fear and discrimination.”
Inclusion is a work in progress
For the roughly 16% of active female service members and 5% of male service members who identified in a 2018 DOD survey as lesbian, gay, bisexual or some other sexual orientation, Kirby conceded these efforts are a work in progress. Indicators across several areas bear this out, both for LGBTQ personnel serving now and the estimated 1 million LGBTQ Veterans.
Military sexual assault: For instance, a RAND report released June 1, 2021, found that active duty service members who identify as lesbian, gay or bisexual or who did not identify as heterosexual are sexually assaulted at disproportionate rates. Yet DOD rarely examines this issue, the report said.
RAND researchers analyzed 2016 and 2018 data from workplace and gender relations surveys of active duty members. The data showed that lesbian, gay, bisexual or nonidentifying-as-heterosexual service members represented 12% of the active population. However, they were 44% and 43% of all sexually assaulted service members in 2016 and 2018, respectively. (The survey doesn’t ask about transgender identification at all.)
“These statistics demonstrate that assaults on the minority of service members who do not describe themselves as heterosexual constitute almost half of all service members who were sexually assaulted in each of these years,” the authors said in the report. “However, we have seen little focus on sexual assaults against LGB service members in DoD prevention materials, research, or public discussion of sexual assault in the military.”
The report recommended DOD improve data collection to understand sexual assault of LGB service members and develop more inclusive sexual assault prevention strategies and materials.
Compensation and benefits: LGBTQ advocates have long argued that policies such as “don’t ask, don’t tell,” in place from 1994-2011, and the recently reversed Trans Military Ban resulted in many harms, including the wrongful discharge from the military and denial of benefits from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).
A commission is needed to study the historic and ongoing impacts of discrimination against LGBTQ service members and Veterans, argued Rep. Mark Takano, the California Democrat who chairs the House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs. He introduced legislation to establish a panel that would hear testimony from service members and Veterans and their families, advocacy organizations and government agencies and issue remedial recommendations.
“Establishing this commission would help Americans understand the effects of anti-LGBTQ military policies, provide a path forward to rectify the injustices, and help create a welcoming culture for LGBTQ servicemembers and Veterans in the military and at VA,” Takano said.
In February, VA announced a wide-ranging review of services provided to LGBTQ Veterans and employees to ensure equity in delivery of medical and gender-affirmation care and procedures. In announcing this policy review, officials reminded LGBT Veterans that care coordinators are present at every VA facility. They can provide LGBT Veterans with access to primary care services, including hormone treatment and HIV prevention services such as PrEP.
Transgender health care: Another bill introduced in the House would prevent DOD from stationing service members who have transgender dependents in states or countries that prohibit or deny them gender-affirming health care and treatment, according to a statement by Rep. Jimmy Panetta, Democrat of California, lead sponsor of the legislation. At the state level, more than 20 new anti-LGBTQ laws have passed this year, many aimed at transgender people, according to the Human Rights Campaign.
Learn more
Biden’s Pride Month proclamation: https://rly.pt/352sgKp
DOD’s policy on military service by transgender persons: https://rly.pt/2TH9LZq
List of VA programs for Veterans who are LGBTQ: https://www.va.gov/initiatives/recognizing-lgbtq-veterans-during-pride-month.
Panetta’s news release: https://panetta.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-panetta-introduces-legislation-protect-transgender-military.
Pentagon press briefing transcript from June 1: https://rly.pt/2T6FRgY
RAND’s Sexual Assault of Sexual Minorities in the U.S. Military: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA1390-1.html.
Takano’s news release: https://rly.pt/355Wqw5
LGBTQ+
Joe Biden
Policy
Law
Veterans Affairs (VA)
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 36
0
0
0
On board Enterprise from 86-89 I had 5 gay sailors in my division! They hung out together 4 white sailors and a black sailor! They never went around pushing their sexuality on other sailors as they new the consequences of that! They all 5 did their jobs and advanced in the division along with every other sailor in the division! My 5 sailors answered the call every time something happened on the flight deck! Being gay or lesbian doesn't make you a bad person!
(0)
(0)
0
0
0
I'm sure the Chinese, Russian and N Korean armies are deeply concerned about the pervs as well. We were warned years ago our military would be destroyed from the inside. And this divisive carcinogen is doing it's job.
(0)
(0)
0
0
0
It must be mentioned that was illegal for 233 of the 248 years of US military history to fit into any of the descriptions defined by those initials. That means that it was not only immoral and unethical, but also illegal to not report your buddy, coworker, or subordinate for being within any of these categories. Even the half-opened closet of DADT required investigation AND separation if it was determined that someone had ventured out of the closet.
The transition from illegal to celebrated demonstrates a problem where the very leaders currently demanding inclusivity had also been the ones initiating discharges. From a morals/values position leaders have to 1) have been morally conflicted towards the anti-LGBT laws and still enforced them, 2) are currently morally conflicted about the pro-LGBT laws and still agree to actively or passively enforce them, or 3) are morally malleable or ambiguous or are basically “without a moral compass” on this subject and are willing to follow any directives as long as their own pensions are secure.
This moral trap was laid out for political ends and captured all the well meaning professionals and includes every member of the military who served prior to 2009. It created insurmountable moral traps for those who attempted to ignore, isolate, or justify themselves from dealing with the policies. A leader cannot choose which rules to enforce, or be blind to what doesn’t affect them and still serve under a military governed by rules, and it shows. It encompasses nearly all the senior enlisted and officers currently making policy.
Regardless of the case of moral decision making, the veterans who served entire careers where the moral imperative was to reject those initials are not wrong to point out that there are inconsistencies where the end goal isn’t clearly a safe and secure nation, and that it’s being managed by people in uniforms which the uninformed would consider that of a warfighter whose business is to guarantee a safe and secure nation.
The transition from illegal to celebrated demonstrates a problem where the very leaders currently demanding inclusivity had also been the ones initiating discharges. From a morals/values position leaders have to 1) have been morally conflicted towards the anti-LGBT laws and still enforced them, 2) are currently morally conflicted about the pro-LGBT laws and still agree to actively or passively enforce them, or 3) are morally malleable or ambiguous or are basically “without a moral compass” on this subject and are willing to follow any directives as long as their own pensions are secure.
This moral trap was laid out for political ends and captured all the well meaning professionals and includes every member of the military who served prior to 2009. It created insurmountable moral traps for those who attempted to ignore, isolate, or justify themselves from dealing with the policies. A leader cannot choose which rules to enforce, or be blind to what doesn’t affect them and still serve under a military governed by rules, and it shows. It encompasses nearly all the senior enlisted and officers currently making policy.
Regardless of the case of moral decision making, the veterans who served entire careers where the moral imperative was to reject those initials are not wrong to point out that there are inconsistencies where the end goal isn’t clearly a safe and secure nation, and that it’s being managed by people in uniforms which the uninformed would consider that of a warfighter whose business is to guarantee a safe and secure nation.
(0)
(0)
Suspended Profile
Don't go out of your way to point out differences in people and then preach inclusion. The military is the one place where it doesn't matter. We come together train as one, fight as one, and if it's our time die as one. The overwhelming emotions you see at a memorial service for a fallen brother or sister isn't because they were black, Jewish, gay, or any other PERSONAL differences. when I lost a brother in Afghanistan I was torn up emotionally. It wasn't because he was Asian, Hell I could see that, It wasn't because he was a Buddhist, that was his personal choice. He was a friend, a brother whom I knew would have my six. Stop trying to divide us while preaching inclusion. The men and women standing on the line are not and never should be PC social experiments.
0
0
0
0
0
0
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google