28
28
0
The term “professional” is a word that can be defined in many ways by differing points of view. I will be defining it from a military profession or "a profession of arms" point of view. Now we must understand that other professions will have vastly different and varying points of view.
In the profession of arms, it is our duty to do things that other Americans would, or could, not do. We, as Americans, are taught from childhood to respect the lives and freedoms of others. In turn, we want our lives and freedoms respected. This we know as the "Golden Rule". But it is our duty as professional Soldiers to, when necessary, infringe in the highest manner possible on another human being's rights by taking his/her life. The duty to lawfully take another human being's life is reserved only for those who truly understand the burden of that duty. The responsibility this duty brings is the highest, hardest and most challenging responsibility that can be given to anyone. Since the beginning of time, the Soldier has been entrusted with the burden of that duty.
Every leader must understand that it takes a certain type of character to be able to lawfully kill another. They must understand that it is not just about killing, but it is also about sacrifice. As Soldiers, we have a duty to our country to take the lives of our enemies. But the enemies that we are duty-bound to kill also believe that they are just as duty-bound to defend their beliefs with deadly force. The Soldiers selected to carry out the judgment of another man's death must understand that they do this at a risk to their own lives and to the lives of their Brothers around them. It is not until this understanding that they can truly be called Soldiers.
A Soldier is not just a person in uniform - a true Soldier forms specific character traits over the years. These traits in our profession are called "The Army Values". These values are: Loyalty, Duty, Respect, Selfless Service, Honor, Integrity, and Personal Courage. It is essential for a Soldier to have these values in order to be entrusted with the responsibility of taking the life of another human being. I'll give you an example using Star Wars. The reason a Jedi must be pure is because of their obligation to the security and welfare of the people they protect from the Dark Side. The Dark Side is the “easy wrong” where leaders conform to the Dark Side when they ignore certain regulations. They ignore these regulations because they think not obeying them is appealing, popular, and will help them gain respect in the eyes of their Soldiers. To help make my point I will use a quote from a SFC on a discussion about professionalism, "I enforce the regulations, without complaining to my subordinates […] I follow regulations not because I believe in them but because I believe in my job as an NCO, if that makes sense".
The regulations that have been placed on Soldiers have not been placed there to annoy those who think they know what being a Soldier is really about. They have been placed there to measure one's ability to conform to and maintain the values expected of us as Soldiers. If every person in uniform were loyal, would there be a need for EO? If every person in uniform understood his or her obligation to duty, would there be AWOLS or prisoner abuse such as Abu Ghraib? If every person in uniform had respect, would the SHARP Program need to exist? If every person in uniform provided selfless service, would there be need for an Army Team Building? If every person in uniform had integrity, would there be an 8th Troop Leading Procedure? If every person in uniform had honor, would there be punishments for stolen valor? And finally if every person in uniform had personal courage, I wouldn't be writing this.
In the profession of arms, it is our duty to do things that other Americans would, or could, not do. We, as Americans, are taught from childhood to respect the lives and freedoms of others. In turn, we want our lives and freedoms respected. This we know as the "Golden Rule". But it is our duty as professional Soldiers to, when necessary, infringe in the highest manner possible on another human being's rights by taking his/her life. The duty to lawfully take another human being's life is reserved only for those who truly understand the burden of that duty. The responsibility this duty brings is the highest, hardest and most challenging responsibility that can be given to anyone. Since the beginning of time, the Soldier has been entrusted with the burden of that duty.
Every leader must understand that it takes a certain type of character to be able to lawfully kill another. They must understand that it is not just about killing, but it is also about sacrifice. As Soldiers, we have a duty to our country to take the lives of our enemies. But the enemies that we are duty-bound to kill also believe that they are just as duty-bound to defend their beliefs with deadly force. The Soldiers selected to carry out the judgment of another man's death must understand that they do this at a risk to their own lives and to the lives of their Brothers around them. It is not until this understanding that they can truly be called Soldiers.
A Soldier is not just a person in uniform - a true Soldier forms specific character traits over the years. These traits in our profession are called "The Army Values". These values are: Loyalty, Duty, Respect, Selfless Service, Honor, Integrity, and Personal Courage. It is essential for a Soldier to have these values in order to be entrusted with the responsibility of taking the life of another human being. I'll give you an example using Star Wars. The reason a Jedi must be pure is because of their obligation to the security and welfare of the people they protect from the Dark Side. The Dark Side is the “easy wrong” where leaders conform to the Dark Side when they ignore certain regulations. They ignore these regulations because they think not obeying them is appealing, popular, and will help them gain respect in the eyes of their Soldiers. To help make my point I will use a quote from a SFC on a discussion about professionalism, "I enforce the regulations, without complaining to my subordinates […] I follow regulations not because I believe in them but because I believe in my job as an NCO, if that makes sense".
The regulations that have been placed on Soldiers have not been placed there to annoy those who think they know what being a Soldier is really about. They have been placed there to measure one's ability to conform to and maintain the values expected of us as Soldiers. If every person in uniform were loyal, would there be a need for EO? If every person in uniform understood his or her obligation to duty, would there be AWOLS or prisoner abuse such as Abu Ghraib? If every person in uniform had respect, would the SHARP Program need to exist? If every person in uniform provided selfless service, would there be need for an Army Team Building? If every person in uniform had integrity, would there be an 8th Troop Leading Procedure? If every person in uniform had honor, would there be punishments for stolen valor? And finally if every person in uniform had personal courage, I wouldn't be writing this.
Posted 11 y ago
Responses: 12
Isnt this Guys arm in the wrong position for a proper salute???? shouldnt he have his elbow at a 90 deg angle parallel to his shoulder? Or is it just the angle the pic was taken???? looks to me like the elbow should be higher and more to the rear, or has the salute also changed over the years as well??? Damn Im getting old !!!!!
(0)
(0)
SGT Michael Glenn
Lol.... I hear that.I did goon to post a thread about this but it has yet to show up,maybe its being screened to see if it hurts anyone's feelings prior to posting it???
(0)
(0)
SPC(P) Jay Heenan
So SGT Michael Glenn, out of the whole essay written by SFC Michael Faircloth, the only thing you can comment on is the picture of the COL saluting? Bored and wanting to pick a fight?
(0)
(0)
SGT Michael Glenn
Spc (p) First and foremost thanks for the mention. 2nd, had you looked at the post just below this one you would have noticed that I did mention and I quote......"Before it goes south on me.... I thought the write up to be awesome and was not intending do degrade what was said at all , WELL WRITTEN !!!" almost 5 months ago. So Im kinda at a loss as to why you would try to pick a fight, are you bored? Have times changed that people actually post they are a (p)? back in the day it was always omitted because it showed you were a power hungry cheese ball and not very liked by ones peers, subordinates or supervisors . It was always the ones who were but didnt advertise to try get the respect who were the best soldiers. Good luck on your career and promotion !
(0)
(0)
Through out my career I saw many Senior NCO's and officers who did not display : Loyalty, Duty, Respect, Selfless Service, Honor, Integrity, and Personal Courage. .And yet they were soldiers who held command positions and hid behind rank while destroying others careers because they did not serve with : Loyalty, Duty, Respect, Selfless Service, Honor, Integrity, and Personal Courage. Because they held the rank and had their noses so far up someone elses ass or lied their ass's off when SHTF they were allowed to remain in their positions and keep doing damage with in the ranks so I for one have a hard time understanding why : Loyalty, Duty, Respect, Selfless Service, Honor, Integrity, and Personal Courage. would be listed when all it would take to describe the characteristics of a soldier would be Honesty (not only to ones self, but to others as well and intestinal fortitude.
(0)
(0)
SGT Michael Glenn
Before it goes south on me.... I thought the write up to be awesome and was not intending do degrade what was said at all , WELL WRITTEN !!!
(0)
(0)
Read This Next


Values
Character
Command Post
