Rp logo flat shadow
Command Post What is this?
Posted on Sep 15, 2015
SGT Ben Keen
32.8K
64
27
18
18
0
Avatar feed
Responses: 13
SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL
6
6
0
SGT Ben Keen thanks for sharing, very intriquing article. Its all about the Soldier, I agree, equipment second. I know the pentagon has a lot of stuff to worry about, but they must take care of pupil first. Its the only way for success!
(6)
Comment
(0)
SGT Ben Keen
SGT Ben Keen
>1 y
Very true SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL they do have a lot to focus on. The main point I am focusing on with this article is not the the Pentagon is messed up, we all know that, but rather that we as leaders at every level from that newly promoted CPL to that time-tested dusty old General, have an important responsibility and lasting impact. While we can't change some of the craziness at the highest of levels, one more change within our lane of control can make things just that much better.
(4)
Reply
(0)
SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL
SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL
>1 y
SGT Ben Keen profoundly said and articulately expressed response! So true!
(4)
Reply
(0)
LTC Yinon Weiss
LTC Yinon Weiss
10 y
Very well said!
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SrA Daniel Hunter
5
5
0
Wise words and a bad-ass machine!
(5)
Comment
(0)
SGT Ben Keen
SGT Ben Keen
>1 y
It truly is a badass machine. It's interesting though to look back and see what the original idea was and what the current reality is. From a small, quick vehicle with just a machine gun and able to carry 11 Soldiers into combat to the current day machine, the development of this badass machine is pretty damn interesting.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
MAJ Anthony Henderson
4
4
0
Great message!!! Thanks for your words of wisdom!!!
(4)
Comment
(0)
SGT Ben Keen
SGT Ben Keen
>1 y
Thank you MAJ Anthony Henderson for the kind words.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Avatar feed
Leadership Lessons Learned from "The Pentagon Wars"
PO3 Steven Sherrill
2
2
0
SGT Ben Keen that movie was hilarious. Then it was sad. It does seem like there are those who are more interested in the flashy new technology than the people who will operate the equipment (F-35 anyone? Anyone?)

You make so many good points here. During the Viking Age, a young person could be fostered to another family. When that foster comes into that family, they would be treated as a member of the household. They would work, they would learn, and they would grow to become a stronger individual in the tribe. This would in turn make the tribe stronger. The military is a family. You may not get along with everyone in your command on a personal level. When the bullets start flying none of that matters. It is a simple matter of we protect each other, or we die with each other. That is family. Whether we admit it to ourselves, like it, or even accept it is irrelevant. When you are in a command, you are family. The CO is mom, the XO is Dad, and everyone else falls into place. We should absolutely continue this through life. I have seen many posts on RP with sentiment to the effect of "I took an oath, and there was no expiration date. Even if my service time expired, my oath did not." That sentiment could be applied here. We as veterans are the older brothers and sisters of those who are transitioning. We need to support each other. The universe knows that Washington is not going to, unless it serves them politically. So that leaves us to watch out for each other. It has taken me fifteen years to come to this epiphany. So the question becomes what do I have to offer by way of helping a fellow veteran? That is the hard question.
(2)
Comment
(0)
SGT Ben Keen
SGT Ben Keen
>1 y
PO3 Steven Sherrill - I love your comment! You are so right. We are a family. That is why I don't refer to Veterans as "Warriors" or "Heros" or whatever the next catchy phrase will be. I call them my brother and sister because they truly are. When people meet me and ask if I have any siblings, I tell yes, I have one blood related sibling and over 1 million non-blood related siblings. I have said it on RallyPoint before as well; if we, as Veterans, aren't willing to look out for other Veterans how can we expect others to do the same? Because as you so said, when the bullets are flying or when times are hard, the only thing that matters is getting through it together.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel
2
2
0
Should be interesting. The Inside the Beltway Political Battles to include inside the Pentagon can be quite fascinating.
(2)
Comment
(0)
SGT Ben Keen
SGT Ben Keen
>1 y
That they are PO1 William "Chip" Nagel. I watched this movie recently with a friend that didn't serve and they kept asking if what was shown in the movie is anything close to how it is. Sadly I had to say some of it is. I think sometimes, leaders get too focused on their own career that they forget about the impact they have on others.
(1)
Reply
(0)
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel
>1 y
Don't need to Explain to me, I'm a Beltway Bandit. 2 Years as Master at Arms to Commander Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command Washington DC. My Guys did Installations at the Pentagon, Buzzards Point and Navy Yard.
(1)
Reply
(0)
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel
>1 y
My SEA for Security at CNO WWMCCS/COMSPAWARYSYSCOM is still in DC as a Civilian Contractor after she retired.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SMSgt Tony Barnes
2
2
0
Great words...great focus.
(2)
Comment
(0)
SGT Ben Keen
SGT Ben Keen
>1 y
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
1SG Military Police
1
1
0
Focus is important. Unfortunately, sometimes this gets lost the higher up the food chain people get. Nothing is more aggravating to see than a senior NCO or a field grade officer that does not put the service member first. That is one of the responsibilities of their rank. It takes a one star or above to take their rank so they should not be fearful of repercussions for doing the right thing. At this stage of their career they have the rank and experience to stand up for those that are entrusted to their charge. The tag line above should read: "Mission first, service member always!"
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
MAJ Alvin B.
1
1
0
As I recall there was also an issue with "mission and scope creep" for the vehicle performance requirements in addition to a desire/pressure to simply get something to the field.
(1)
Comment
(0)
SGT Ben Keen
SGT Ben Keen
10 y
There was according to the book and movie.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
MAJ Alvin B.
1
1
0
I have always been a firm believer in people first. It does not matter the mission, time or place, if you have not taken care of your people (soldiers, employees, family, etc..) they will be exposed to undue risk. I believed that when I wore the uniform daily, i believe it today in my private life, work life and volunteer service life.
(1)
Comment
(0)
SGT Ben Keen
SGT Ben Keen
10 y
Great comments MAJ Alvin B.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SGT William Howell
1
1
0
Just a couple thoughts. First an Air Force Colonel helped the Army get one bad ass fighting vehicle. It says a lot about him taking seriously the job given to him and putting his heart into giving the Army what it needed.

Second, the Marines have always held this doctrine. They always seem to do more with less. They focus on the Marine and making him a warrior then giving him/her what tools they have to make him more effective. The basis that all Marines can be infantry, officers and enlisted, gives them the ability to serve multi roles as needed and quickly change rolls.

I was a MP. I was trained as an MP and that was my job. Once we hit Iraq my unit needed the skills that the infantry had as we filled in some of those rolls as needed. We adapted and were combat effective, but those small squad tactics could have been taught early in the game and made us better, quicker.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close