Posted on Mar 26, 2021
Longer Hair, Earrings, Lipstick: Army modifies some grooming standards
30K
255
75
90
90
0
It’s official: As a female soldier, you can grow your hair to any length and wear it in a ponytail or another style, as long as it’s neat, doesn’t go beyond the collar or interfere with headgear or equipment. You can wear stud earrings in the combat uniform if not deployed or in the field, and put on certain shades of lipstick and nail polish.
As a male soldier, you can join your female colleagues in highlighting your hair in a natural color, or using nail polish, as long as it’s clear. But you still must shave your facial hair (unless you have a medical or religious exception).
These are among the appearance and grooming changes the Army added on March 2, 2021, to the newly updated Army Regulation 670-1, Wear and Appearance of Army Uniforms and Insignia, which became effective Feb. 26, 2021. The March 2 additions are an official part of the AR 670-1, but due to timing issues, were tacked onto the official document in an All Army Activities (ALARACT) message.
“I think this is really good for the Army,” said Sgt. Maj. of the Army Michael A. Grinston at a Facebook town hall earlier this year, where he previewed the policy changes, which generally apply to the regular Army, Army National Guard and the U.S. Army Reserve. He was accompanied by Sgt. Maj. Brian C. Sanders and Sgt. Maj. Mark Anthony Clark of the Uniform Policy Branch.
“These (standards) aren’t about male and female,” Grinston insisted. “This is about an Army standard and how we move forward with the Army and being a more diverse, inclusive team.”
Retaining female service members
Nevertheless, many of the changes appear aimed at improving recruitment and retention of female soldiers, who make up about 18% of the 1.01 million member Army, but exit at higher rates than male soldiers. A May 2020 Government Accountability Office (GAO) report found that the likelihood of separation for female service members across service branches is 28% higher than that of males. Factors cited for leaving include child care, family planning, organizational culture, sexual assault and work schedules.
GAO recommended that the Department of Defense develop performance-based plans to improve female recruitment and retention, and DOD agreed.
In the area of child care, the AR 670-1 makes it clear:
· You can breastfeed on federal property.
· You can now wear an optional T-shirt to breastfeed or pump.
· You can unzip or remove the Army combat uniform coat to breastfeed.
· You can remove the coat and unbutton the shirt of the Army service uniform, Army green service uniform or mess uniform as needed to breastfeed.
· As you breastfeed, you don’t need to cover up yourself or your child with additional items.
Grinston commended the diverse group of soldiers for suggesting the changes to leaders and for serving on the panel that considered and voted to approve the recommendations, which he said senior leaders accepted.
The process, Grinston said, broadened his outlook. “I used to say, ‘We’re all soldiers. I just see green,’” he said. “What I learned, even throughout myself, is that when you say that you don’t see me as a soldier.”
Promoting wellness and readiness
Some policy changes were based on the advice of experts in behavioral health, dermatology and other areas. For instance, Sanders said the panel found that previous rules requiring female soldiers to create buns from short hair led some to suffer hair damage or develop alopecia, which can lead to severe hair loss. Readiness was at issue in allowing long ponytails under certain conditions, Grinston said, by letting females fit helmets more snugly.
Additional changes promote diversity and inclusion by standardizing terminology in grooming and appearance, removing potentially offensive words to describe appearance such as mohawk or Fu Manchu, and allowing accents and hyphens to nameplates.
Other revisions to AR 670-1 include:
· Authorizing the carrying of bags, handbags, purses and backpacks and allowing combat uniform sleeves to be rolled up.
· Adding the Improved Hot Weather Combat Uniform as an authorized uniform.
· Implementing policy for the new Army green service uniform.
· Adding guidance on wearing of shoulder sleeve insignia for distinctive unit and military operations in hostile conditions.
Keeping the no-beard policy
With more than 100,000 signatories to a change.org petition asking the Army to allow facial hair in a garrison environment, Grinston was asked if male soldiers will be allowed to grow beards.
Although he said this “is not one of the things we looked at” in this review, Grinston reminded leaders that there are valid, authorized exceptions to the no-beard rule.
“If there is an exception to policy to have a beard, there should be no leader out there telling a soldier to shave,” he said. “We have to be better than that.”
Learn more
· Access a U.S. Army page with answers to questions and additional resources on the grooming standards: https://rly.pt/3tY7upw
· Download the AR 670-1, Wear and Appearance of Army Uniforms and Insignia: https://rly.pt/2P0M7oZ
· Download the ALARACT supplemental to the AR 670-1 (CAC access may be required): https://rly.pt/3lYxxKv
· Read the GAO report: https://rly.pt/3w534is
· View the change.org petition about beards: https://rly.pt/3cnEZLZ
· Watch the AR 670-1 town hall: https://rly.pt/3fj0jUL
As a male soldier, you can join your female colleagues in highlighting your hair in a natural color, or using nail polish, as long as it’s clear. But you still must shave your facial hair (unless you have a medical or religious exception).
These are among the appearance and grooming changes the Army added on March 2, 2021, to the newly updated Army Regulation 670-1, Wear and Appearance of Army Uniforms and Insignia, which became effective Feb. 26, 2021. The March 2 additions are an official part of the AR 670-1, but due to timing issues, were tacked onto the official document in an All Army Activities (ALARACT) message.
“I think this is really good for the Army,” said Sgt. Maj. of the Army Michael A. Grinston at a Facebook town hall earlier this year, where he previewed the policy changes, which generally apply to the regular Army, Army National Guard and the U.S. Army Reserve. He was accompanied by Sgt. Maj. Brian C. Sanders and Sgt. Maj. Mark Anthony Clark of the Uniform Policy Branch.
“These (standards) aren’t about male and female,” Grinston insisted. “This is about an Army standard and how we move forward with the Army and being a more diverse, inclusive team.”
Retaining female service members
Nevertheless, many of the changes appear aimed at improving recruitment and retention of female soldiers, who make up about 18% of the 1.01 million member Army, but exit at higher rates than male soldiers. A May 2020 Government Accountability Office (GAO) report found that the likelihood of separation for female service members across service branches is 28% higher than that of males. Factors cited for leaving include child care, family planning, organizational culture, sexual assault and work schedules.
GAO recommended that the Department of Defense develop performance-based plans to improve female recruitment and retention, and DOD agreed.
In the area of child care, the AR 670-1 makes it clear:
· You can breastfeed on federal property.
· You can now wear an optional T-shirt to breastfeed or pump.
· You can unzip or remove the Army combat uniform coat to breastfeed.
· You can remove the coat and unbutton the shirt of the Army service uniform, Army green service uniform or mess uniform as needed to breastfeed.
· As you breastfeed, you don’t need to cover up yourself or your child with additional items.
Grinston commended the diverse group of soldiers for suggesting the changes to leaders and for serving on the panel that considered and voted to approve the recommendations, which he said senior leaders accepted.
The process, Grinston said, broadened his outlook. “I used to say, ‘We’re all soldiers. I just see green,’” he said. “What I learned, even throughout myself, is that when you say that you don’t see me as a soldier.”
Promoting wellness and readiness
Some policy changes were based on the advice of experts in behavioral health, dermatology and other areas. For instance, Sanders said the panel found that previous rules requiring female soldiers to create buns from short hair led some to suffer hair damage or develop alopecia, which can lead to severe hair loss. Readiness was at issue in allowing long ponytails under certain conditions, Grinston said, by letting females fit helmets more snugly.
Additional changes promote diversity and inclusion by standardizing terminology in grooming and appearance, removing potentially offensive words to describe appearance such as mohawk or Fu Manchu, and allowing accents and hyphens to nameplates.
Other revisions to AR 670-1 include:
· Authorizing the carrying of bags, handbags, purses and backpacks and allowing combat uniform sleeves to be rolled up.
· Adding the Improved Hot Weather Combat Uniform as an authorized uniform.
· Implementing policy for the new Army green service uniform.
· Adding guidance on wearing of shoulder sleeve insignia for distinctive unit and military operations in hostile conditions.
Keeping the no-beard policy
With more than 100,000 signatories to a change.org petition asking the Army to allow facial hair in a garrison environment, Grinston was asked if male soldiers will be allowed to grow beards.
Although he said this “is not one of the things we looked at” in this review, Grinston reminded leaders that there are valid, authorized exceptions to the no-beard rule.
“If there is an exception to policy to have a beard, there should be no leader out there telling a soldier to shave,” he said. “We have to be better than that.”
Learn more
· Access a U.S. Army page with answers to questions and additional resources on the grooming standards: https://rly.pt/3tY7upw
· Download the AR 670-1, Wear and Appearance of Army Uniforms and Insignia: https://rly.pt/2P0M7oZ
· Download the ALARACT supplemental to the AR 670-1 (CAC access may be required): https://rly.pt/3lYxxKv
· Read the GAO report: https://rly.pt/3w534is
· View the change.org petition about beards: https://rly.pt/3cnEZLZ
· Watch the AR 670-1 town hall: https://rly.pt/3fj0jUL
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 20
I have heard that the buns or pulled up gives headaches...plus it is difficult to wear caps and combat headgear. I am all for it...makes operational sense. Foreign governments have been doing this for a long time. Don't know if it helps with retention...changing hair styles and breastfeeding changes etc aren't the issues I am hearing about...I am hearing about sexual assault, harassment, just overall treatment of women in the ranks. Until we get that addressed and under some sort of control, hair styles etc won't mean a hill of beans...I don't think I will ever hear someone say "they let me keep my hair long so I am going to reup!" IMHO.
(20)
(0)
Lt Col Scott Shuttleworth
MAJ (Join to see) But in a fighter/tanker/helo helmet or in garrison it makes perfect sense. Plust it has worked for the Israelis with no known issues and to me honest I don't think I would want to go hand to hand combat with one of them.
(0)
(0)
SGT Mary G.
The article stated the hair must still not "go beyond the collar". That means that long hair, while allowable, must be "up" in a way that does not interfere with head gear. I had long hair. I braided it, and secured the braid up, to the back of my head. It was never a problem, always stayed in place, and did not interfere with any headgear. I can not envision how a pony tail would not go beyond the collar or that it would not interfere with headgear.
(1)
(0)
Lt Col Scott Shuttleworth
SGT Mary G. our female pilots live the idea of a ponytail...when they step to a jet and put on that flight helmet, they have to let their hair down anyway to wear the full helmet...before the change they would take it down, ho fly, and before they left the jet they would put it back up to walk in the squadron...same with chem gear...now I don't see it interfering with a combat helmet but I am bald so I have no say in that.
(0)
(0)
COL (Join to see)
Agree 100% regarding assault & harassment. This post is about uniforms & grooming, not crime, but the ongoing scourge of violence and intimidation against our own team members remains unsolved. I thought about as fratricide - intentionally harming members of your own team.
(1)
(0)
Beards for male Soldier will eventually be allowed at this rate, to bad I retired that would have been fun to watch a CSM explode :) Maybe even ponytails for male Soldiers, no more high and tights. Oh brave new world.
(17)
(0)
PO1 Rick Nakroshis
A1C Alexa Cosson - The thought of a "high and tight" man bun stopped me in my tracks.
(2)
(0)
I'm not sure this promotes retention or recruitment but it does seem reasonable
(10)
(0)
SFC (Join to see)
From my personal experience being able to wear posted earrings, having different "relaxed" hair styles and doing up my nails isn't making me want to stay in.
I appreciate the changes, but it's not the reason I'm pushing for the next eight years. My female trainees are loving it, but as we change generations we might see these changes help in a larger scope.
I appreciate the changes, but it's not the reason I'm pushing for the next eight years. My female trainees are loving it, but as we change generations we might see these changes help in a larger scope.
(6)
(0)
TSgt Ann Smith
SFC (Join to see) - the AF has ALWAYS had the privilege to try and look like a girl in that baggy uniform.
(4)
(0)
1stSgt Nelson Kerr
It can't hurt those thing, or the mission and makes for happier troops at zero cost
(2)
(0)
Read This Next


Policy
Grooming Standards
Readiness
Wellness
Women in the Military
