Rp logo flat shadow
Command Post What is this?
Posted on Nov 3, 2017
MAJ Montgomery Granger
102K
1.63K
529
318
318
0
Avatar feed
Responses: 239
SGT Tony Clifford
9
9
0
Well, I tend to think that we should have just left him in Afghanistan. Why is it that he's being freed in the US? He left his ID on the FOB he deserted. On deployment you ID counts as a passport. A revocation of citizenship abroad only requires that you surrender your passport to the US government, which he did. By that metric, he isn't a citizen anymore, he is a man without a country.
(9)
Comment
(0)
Capt Gregory Prickett
Capt Gregory Prickett
>1 y
We do not leave soldiers behind on the battlefield. Period.

Your comment on losing US citizenship is also incorrect.
(2)
Reply
(0)
MAJ Montgomery Granger
MAJ Montgomery Granger
>1 y
I like your comment a lot. If nothing else it shows INTENT. He knew he would be identified by the Taliban as an American, and he used leaving the ID behind as proof that he wanted to be on their side. More circumstantial evidence of treasonous behavior. Hooah!
(2)
Reply
(0)
SGM Erik Marquez
SGM Erik Marquez
>1 y
"Well, I tend to think that we should have just left him in Afghanistan."
That would be covered under something your parents likely taught you..
Two wrongs don't make a right.

No, he needed to come back to the US, we leave no one behind, friend or foe.
Im not in agreement in how the president at the time did that, but I accept it needed to be done in some way.... No one gets left behind.

Clearly I have stated my believe justice was not done after he was brought home ...and that is the topic now.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Capt Gregory Prickett
Capt Gregory Prickett
>1 y
MAJ Montgomery Granger - it's a good thing that circumstantial evidence can't be used to prove the offense of treason, not that he was charged with anything approaching that, and not that leaving the ID would even rise to the level of circumstantial evidence of treason. That would never get before the court, and if it did, under the argument proposed by the two of you as to its meaning, it would result in a mistrial.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
1stSgt Eugene Harless
9
9
0
The precedent was already set with this Scumba He deserted TWICE.
Once in Iraq and once while awaiting trial. He only served two years. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wassef_Ali_Hassoun
(9)
Comment
(0)
SSG (ret) William Martin
SSG (ret) William Martin
6 y
I remember that one.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
MSgt Wayne Morris
8
8
0
First "Chelsea" and now Bergdahl. How are military leaders supposed to enforce the rules and regulations when apparently the UCMJ has be overcome by political correctness and career officers afraid to make the right call. I for one have a hard time deciding who is the bigger failure, Bergdahl or the judge.
(8)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGM Mikel Dawson
7
7
0
What a slap in the face of justice. Wonder who got paid off? I'd put my faith in the UCMJ, but it has clearly failed this time.
(7)
Comment
(0)
PVT Raymond Lopez
PVT Raymond Lopez
>1 y
1ac3e097
I have a very strong suspicion about who got paid off!!
(3)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SMSgt Thor Merich
7
7
0
While I agree with you whole heartedly, apparently Col. Nance does not. I have to wonder which Army the Col is in. Because the professed values of the U.S. Army, and the DOD as a whole were not held up today.
(7)
Comment
(0)
MAJ Montgomery Granger
MAJ Montgomery Granger
>1 y
Hooah!
(1)
Reply
(0)
PO3 John Jeter
PO3 John Jeter
>1 y
Personally I see a trend continuing from the previous administration. Most of those officers who stood up and publicly differed from the agenda of our last 'leader' were hammered into the ground or swept aside. Though I have nothing but an opinion to go on, I'm of the belief that this "sentence" was predetermined when Bergdahl was brought home and it was just a matter of finding a compliant........instrument......to carry out the job. That is a bitter and painful idea to contemplate, as it shows a betrayal every bit as bad as the one committed by the accused.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SCPO Morris Ramsey
7
7
0
MAJ Montgomery Granger Good post Major.
(7)
Comment
(0)
MAJ Montgomery Granger
MAJ Montgomery Granger
>1 y
Thank you! Hooah!
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Mark Bailey
6
6
0
Absolutely correct on all counts

The Presiding Judge abdicated not only his ability to enforce a very simple rule of war;
"run from combat and suffer the consequences."

This was politically motivated and now we all suffer from this stupid decision...and for what it is worth. I really dont care if they beat him wet noodles or barbed wire... he put himself in that position and that decision carried its own weight.

Add this scumbag to the PVT Manning who sold secrets and was then pardoned in another misguided liberal attempt to sway how the Military works... and we have a lasting legacy of shame that will never truly go away.
(6)
Comment
(0)
COL Jon Lopey
COL Jon Lopey
6 y
SFC Bailey: You got that right - Thanks for the relevant honest, and outstanding commentary! Thank you for your service as a senior NCO as well...Jon
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
PFC Ammunition Specialist
6
6
0
I am extremely disappointed with the judges choice for no prison time. I do not care if he got busted down to a private along with dishonorable discharge and pay fines for 10 months. He should be sitting in a military prison for life. He endangered several soldiers’ lives by what he did.

Plus he is going to fight the dishonorable discharge.....that’s a bunch of......welll, you know what....... this a-hole is a waste of air and space. He needs to shot on site and buried outside of a cemetery in the ground facing down. That way, he for goes and rots in hell along with his Taliban brothers.
(6)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSgt Dean Gartman
5
5
0
Poor excuse for justice. Should at least spend the rest of his life in Levenworth. Penalty should have been Death. Men died trying to rescue him cut and dried.
(5)
Comment
(0)
MAJ Montgomery Granger
MAJ Montgomery Granger
>1 y
I agree.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
LtCol Robert Quinter
5
5
0
There was actually a precedent for Bergdahl in the Garwood case after Viet Nam. I feel the same way about Bergdahl as I did Garwood and find many similarities in the cases. Both had questionable, but brief, records prior to their leaving, or disappearing, from their posts, and both reaped the profits of having powerful politicians on their teams and courts when popular support of the war had dissolved or at least waned. Fortunately, judging from the majority of the responses to the Major's write up, the sense of duty persists in the hearts of most of us, and the leniency of Bergdahl's sentence will not have any more lasting effect upon military members as did Garwood's. True warriors know what is expected of them and will adhere to their self generated expectations of service. The threat of a court martial is not the source of dedication to duty, nor even obedience to orders; they come from within.
(5)
Comment
(0)
MAJ Montgomery Granger
MAJ Montgomery Granger
>1 y
Well said, Sir! I agree wholeheartedly. Thank you very much for your input.
(3)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close