Rp logo flat shadow
Command Post What is this?
Posted on Nov 3, 2017
MAJ Montgomery Granger
102K
1.63K
529
318
318
0
Avatar feed
Responses: 239
COL Steph Browne
0
0
0
The military judge may impose a sentence based solely upon the charges of which the accused is adjudged guilty and the evidence heard during the case. In this case the accused was found guilty of a 1day desertion, it was not during a time of war as the current conflict, as all others since WWII have not been declared wars by Congress. There was evidence presented that he suffered from mental health issues when the Army enlisted him. There was evidence of 2other SMS being injured while hunting for him. There was evidence that, once returned, the accused provided invaluable information on the movements, etc. of the enemy which is still being used by our forces. Lastly, there was evidence of unlawful command influence by the Commander in Chief. Having served as a military judge, I can attest that the hardest part of the job is fashioning an appropriate sentence. We are all free to disagree with the sentence adjudged but we must recognize that COL Nance is a professional, well regarded officer and judge. He weighed the permissible factors and made a decision. You don’t have to like it but is lawful and the result of an application of the Rule of Law. Taking pot shots after the fact from the cheap seats benefits no one.
(0)
Comment
(0)
COL Steph Browne
COL Steph Browne
>1 y
MAJ, there are no rubrics used in sentencing as we are tasked with fashioning a sentence based upon the specifics of each Dave and each defendant. The Supreme Court essentially through out the only system somewhat akin to what you suggest, the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, because it took the discretion inherent in all judicial functions away from the judges. Sentencing is the most difficult part of a judge’s job. I can tell you that having appeared in court as both a prosecutor and a defense counsel at various points in my career, it is very easy to argue for a specific sentence when you aren’t the one tasked with actually imposing it. In my book, a patriot upholds the Constitution, Judge Nance did just that.
(0)
Reply
(0)
COL Steph Browne
COL Steph Browne
>1 y
Sorry, fat fingers. It is fashion a sentence based on each case and defendant.
(0)
Reply
(0)
COL Steph Browne
COL Steph Browne
>1 y
Again, apologies for fat fingers, it should be threw out not through out.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SSgt James Holt
SSgt James Holt
6 y
With respects sir; I believe it was a time of war as Congress voted to authorize the President the authority to carry out offensive military action. There is no specification constitutionally speaking specifying the wording of required of a declaration of war. The Congress voted to grant the President means to execute his war powers as CINC of the US Mililtary Services and that sir I am satisfied is the definition of a declaration of war.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Psychological Operations Specialist
0
0
0
I don't question the judgment of the officer appointed over his court-martial and I think it's inappropriate to make assumptions about his case based on media sensationalism. Justice, military or otherwise shouldn't be politicized, either. I'm more worried about the politicization of our justice system than some stupid kid who spent years in captivity because he made some bad decisions when he was a private.
(0)
Comment
(0)
MAJ Montgomery Granger
MAJ Montgomery Granger
>1 y
"Some stupid kid" was a soldier in the United States Army, sworn to defend his country. It's no small act to desert your comrades in a war zone. To say so betrays your own misunderstanding and appreciation of the value of LOYALTY, DUTY, RESPECT, SELFLESS SERVICE HONOR, INTEGRITY and PERSONAL COURAGE.
(2)
Reply
(0)
SSG Psychological Operations Specialist
SSG (Join to see)
>1 y
Edit: Nevermind
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
LCDR Naval Aviator
0
0
0
"Kneeling for the national anthem and the absence of even one American flag on the opening night of a national political convention are not simply warning signs, they are signs of the apocalypse that feed the idea that Bergdahl did nothing wrong."

I was mostly with you until that absolutely insane sentence. And moreover, since you weren't a part of the proceedings, it's more likely than not there are circumstances or information to which you're not privy. Don't make a mountain out of a molehill.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
PO1 Fire Controlman
0
0
0
I think that had certain twitter superstars had kept their thumbs off the keyboard, we might have had at least the prison time that he needs. I do believe that had he pleaded not guilty, I would have been fine with a firing squad. Since he pled guilty, I thought that he would at least get some time. But instead, someone got involved and tainted the proceedings with command influence. That is how I see it. Anything other than what he got would have been fodder for the appeal that certainly was going to happen regardless of the sentence.

There is no secret that I'm not pleased with the current POTUS. But don't put me into the HC camp either.

Thoughtful comments welcomed. Trolls troll elsewhere.
(0)
Comment
(0)
MAJ Montgomery Granger
MAJ Montgomery Granger
>1 y
I think undue influence from then President Obama was light years more than anything President Trump has done since becoming elected. A dog and pony show in the Rose Garden at the White house, with Bergdahl's father praising Allah in Arabic, and releasing of five Taliban LEADERS, and LYING about Bergdahl having served "honorably" poisoned the water for a fair sentencing hearing.
(0)
Reply
(0)
PO1 Fire Controlman
PO1 (Join to see)
>1 y
The moment Trump tweeted his thoughts on what the judge should do, he forever tainted the due process. In my humble opinion. I said the day it happened that it was bad for a just sentence. I know what the wartime penalty is. As it should be. He deserved a one-way ticket to the afterlife. But POTUS ensured that would not happen.
I wasn't a fan of the dog and pony show either. Sent and sends the wrong message.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SPC Christopher Perrien
0
0
0
To honest and Devil Advocate. Bergdahl should have never joined or allowed to stay -in. Then he got hit by the truth of US presence in Af-Pak and the "War on Terror. (It is a joke) He should have just waited his time and got out. I did. But since he didn't he broke contract and got other people killed. For that he deserves alot of punishment to maintain morale of others. However here is the clue, since the army did nothing to him, it is apparent the army does not care about the morale of the people in. It doesn't need to , to perform its mission of making money for the MIC or ensuring the security of a Middle eastern nation. we got too many generals as politicians and waiting their for their 2nd job at some big defense contractor. The army ain't around to fight wars no more for the American people, It is the security arm for the New World order. A security guard wanders off and a few get hurt/killed? BFD. The big green machine doesn't worry about Bergdahl, because it doesn't worry about any of its soldiers. They are mops in the closet of a big Corporation.
(0)
Comment
(0)
MAJ Montgomery Granger
MAJ Montgomery Granger
>1 y
That's one view. I do not share it. I doubt if most military people share it. We are patriot volunteers in the greatest, most powerful and effective military ever known to man. Because people profit from war in a capitalist society some think the profit is evil. It's business. The Army can't sustain itself. It can't grow its own beans nor make its own bullets. Those things cost money. As for the New World Order, we have military in over 200 countries world wide. Why? Power projection in order to influence others in the best interests of the USA.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SPC Christopher Perrien
SPC Christopher Perrien
>1 y
MAJ Montgomery Granger - In the longrun- all wars are trade wars, though we may be getting into something else now (a religious war). But even that is a trade war.
The marine have nicnkame from their days of the Banana Wars,-War Dogs of Capitalism
Anyway, wars are fought by poor people, the rich benefit. And it is done by waving the flag of patriotism.

I BELIEVE IN DEFENDING THE COUNTRY. What I don't believe in is being in other countries forcing anything on people. What if a military force was in our country forcing an alien view on us? Yea, you fight them them too. We are making enemies that way, and we ain't making friends so something is wrong with our method.

Once you get older maybe you'll see it, or you'll carry that "patriotism" all that way , no matter.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Bde Mobility Nco
0
0
0
He didn’t anytime lol. Everyone should choose court martial the next time you are in the commanders office lol.
(0)
Comment
(0)
SFC Bde Mobility Nco
SFC (Join to see)
>1 y
*get
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Sgt Ramon Nacanaynay
0
0
0
War is insane. War is obsolete in resolving differences. War does not prove who is right or wrong. War does not prove who is good or bad. Soldiers are suppose to protect their country and its people not the interest or fears of the country's status quo and go on pre-emptive invasions. Truth is the first casualty of war and history is written by the victor. We are insane and we suspect that we are.
(0)
Comment
(0)
MAJ Montgomery Granger
MAJ Montgomery Granger
>1 y
Yet here you are, living free in the greatest country ever known, created for you by the sacrifices of those who came before you who so believed in it's principles that they were willing to lay down their lives for . . . you. Thank you for your service and your opinion.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Sgt Ramon Nacanaynay
Sgt Ramon Nacanaynay
>1 y
MAJ Montgomery Granger - We can do better. I am studying Nonviolence and nonviolent communication. Depending on who you listen to there have been many successes with nonviolence.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Edward Tilton
0
0
0
The soldiers shot while attempting to rescue Bergdahl are his responsibility but the four killed in Niger knew what they signed up for.
(0)
Comment
(0)
MAJ Montgomery Granger
MAJ Montgomery Granger
>1 y
That comment is taken out of context. Maybe you never read the whole thing, but it was an empathetic expression from the Commander in Chief to the grieving widow of an American hero. Politicizing it is an act of cowardice.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Capt Gregory Prickett
Capt Gregory Prickett
>1 y
MAJ Montgomery Granger - except that it wasn't taken by the widow as empathy, it was taken as an insult.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SFC Intelligence Analyst
SFC (Join to see)
>1 y
MAJ Montgomery Granger - How was it taken out of context? Were you there when it was said to the widow and his mother? I doubt it. I believe them over anyone else. She was offended. She said she cried after she got off the phone with him and was much more upset. But what does she know right? How is anyone supposed to "read the whole thing?"
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Cpl Tou Lee Yang
4
0
4
It is sad that people has to die to search for him...but "they knew what they signed up for".
(4)
Comment
(4)
Cpl Tou Lee Yang
Cpl Tou Lee Yang
>1 y
PFC (Join to see) - Joyce, it doesn't matter if you prefer to be called by your first name by a stranger. If your name is label somewhere, i.e. on your shirt if you work for a company, that's exactly what I'm going to call you. In the matter between me and Erik, you didn't know the situation yet you wanted to voice your opinion. I wonder if you ever heard of the quote "stay out of people's business". Anyway, at least you added your ten cent worth of comments. And I like to hear people assertion that they would willingly re-enlist again. Well, there's nothing stopping you from doing that if you have a RE-1A on your DD-214, otherwise refrain from mentioning it to sound patriotic.
(0)
Reply
(0)
PFC Ammunition Specialist
PFC (Join to see)
>1 y
Cpl Tou Lee Yang - then in my honest opinion of you Mr Yang, you are a disgrace to the uniform you once wore, and a disrespectful jerk who just wants attention. That is my humble and honest opinion of you because you cannot pull your head out of your behind long enough to see that someone was being respectful towards you but yet you remain a complete jackass.

As far as minding my own business....when you post on a public forum and attack a person who I respect and consider a friend I will say something to defend him and his honor. You disrespected his title, and ethnicity. So grow up.

good luck on the lowly life you you. since you think everyone on here and around owes you respect when in reality no of us owes you jack shit!
(0)
Reply
(0)
Cpl Tou Lee Yang
Cpl Tou Lee Yang
>1 y
PFC (Join to see) - Joyce, the feeling is mutual. I'm not here to make friends with you nor Erik. Clearly your political values and belief is worlds apart from my own just as it is with Erik. He may be a Sergeant Major to you, but to me, he's Erik. I don't care what rank he is nor do I care what rank anyone else is, in the end, we're all just man that needs a tittle to validate our authority over others. If I insulted you by displaying no respect towards Erik, then you need a new hobby. I never claimed that you or anyone owes me anything, it's you that believed I owe Erik some from of respect due to his title. You need to stop contradicting yourself.
(0)
Reply
(0)
PFC Ammunition Specialist
PFC (Join to see)
>1 y
Cpl Tou Lee Yang - then why are you even on RallyPoint at all if you are going to be nothing but disrespectful towards anyone that questions you? Why not just start your own political incorrect hate filled group that post whatever you and people that have the same views as you can all go to? That way you won’t feel threatened by someone like SGM ERIK MARQUEZ or myself.

You are the one that accused me of a trump lover and all sorts of other things when you know nothing about me. I made an true and honest observation and opinion based on your responses to others on here before I even engaged contact with you. So my opinion seems to be pretty spot on about you and it must be killing you for someone calling you out on it.

Your behavior is of a child that has not been corrected growing up and got away with throwing temper tantrums in the middle of a store for attention.

Until you can grow up, stop with the b.s. because you are really the TROLL they labeled you as!
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close