6
6
0
http://Op-Ed: It's not the rifle, it’s the round: Considerations for the US Army’s future battle rifle: http://americanmilitarynews.com/2017/08/op-ed-its-not-the-rifle-its-the-round-considerations-for-the-us-armys-future-battle-rifle/
I can't wait to see the result of this.
I can't wait to see the result of this.
Posted from Op-Ed
Infantry
Weapons
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 2
1
1
0
Good article, but I still prefer to deliver ordinance from around 400' in increments from 500#s and up. :-)
(1)
(0)
Lt Col John (Jack) Christensen
Ya agree, recent events prove that we can piss off sources for 7.62 NATO round.
(1)
(0)
PFC (Join to see)
Lt Col John (Jack) Christensen - I mean big fan of the 7.62x51mm but we need newer designs for them like FNH SCAR MK17 is a step in the right direction.
(1)
(0)
PFC (Join to see)
Lt Col John (Jack) Christensen - I mean I'm not bashing the m14 at all great weapon it's just has limitations it's heavy its not designed well for room clearing it was just built in a different time were that wasn't as much of a consideration.
(1)
(0)
1
1
0
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google