Responses: 4
I agree with the author. The chances of this not being a man made manipulated virus are truly remote
(4)
(0)
Very interesting. I doubt if we will be told the true origins, especially if it was specifically manipulated to infect humans by China.
(3)
(0)
SrA John Monette
SGT (Join to see) - I know absolutely nothing about genetics and things like that. But what if there were multiple alterations? Would all of them be able to be traced back to the source?
(0)
(0)
I agree,SGT (Join to see). Imho, the vax or not vax issue is about vagueness associated with everything about covid. Vagueness is always an obvious intent to NOT provide facts people need. In this case, facts not only about vaccinations that are not, yet, approved by FDA, which makes everyone a test subject, but also about who should avoid them and why (i.e. what medical conditions, what allergies etc.). Either that information is unknown (i.e. everyone is being used as a test subject) or it is being withheld (i.e. something nefarious is the end goal).
Is there a third possibility? When mistrust has been created by vagueness it seems unlikely. And nothing about confident news reporting that changes direction from day to day creates trust, particularly early on which only came across then and still, as reactive fear-mongering.
Add to that demonizing respectable knowledgeable people who are educated about what they share, who choose to share information that focuses on preventative measures to strength the immune system (a good choice no matter what) and known treatments not being used that minimize fatal damage, and the demonizing of practical good sense does lead people to consider vax or not vax as their mistrust level increases in direct proportion to the relentless mindless pushing to vax. One size does not fit all. Different circumstances result in different choices. "Persuasion" in the form of pay-offs and celebrity sound bites that provide celebrities an income and nothing more, create additional mistrust and so do the shaming efforts. There is already a big business in fake credentials which will only increase if people really, really, really want to go somewhere or do something that requires a health certificate checkpoint and they don't have one.
Then there are highly educated experienced immunologists who can and do talk about the vaccines, having researched the viruses and the vaccines. The details presented by these folks are useful for decision making (like the "ingredients" that are actually part of the vaccines and what they do in the body) since they shared important information (citing available research) as if people are bright enough to understand clear detailed explanations that obviously make sense. Most adults understand clearly presented information when spared emotive vagueness about anything as a bad substitute for omission of needed facts.
Is there a third possibility? When mistrust has been created by vagueness it seems unlikely. And nothing about confident news reporting that changes direction from day to day creates trust, particularly early on which only came across then and still, as reactive fear-mongering.
Add to that demonizing respectable knowledgeable people who are educated about what they share, who choose to share information that focuses on preventative measures to strength the immune system (a good choice no matter what) and known treatments not being used that minimize fatal damage, and the demonizing of practical good sense does lead people to consider vax or not vax as their mistrust level increases in direct proportion to the relentless mindless pushing to vax. One size does not fit all. Different circumstances result in different choices. "Persuasion" in the form of pay-offs and celebrity sound bites that provide celebrities an income and nothing more, create additional mistrust and so do the shaming efforts. There is already a big business in fake credentials which will only increase if people really, really, really want to go somewhere or do something that requires a health certificate checkpoint and they don't have one.
Then there are highly educated experienced immunologists who can and do talk about the vaccines, having researched the viruses and the vaccines. The details presented by these folks are useful for decision making (like the "ingredients" that are actually part of the vaccines and what they do in the body) since they shared important information (citing available research) as if people are bright enough to understand clear detailed explanations that obviously make sense. Most adults understand clearly presented information when spared emotive vagueness about anything as a bad substitute for omission of needed facts.
(2)
(0)
(2)
(0)
SGT Mary G.
SGT (Join to see) - Thank you, I have. I subscribe to the thought that the devil is in the details ONLY if the devil is present, lol.
(2)
(0)
Read This Next