Posted on Dec 10, 2016
Ex-CIA boss amazed Trump doesn't believe Russia hacked US election
12.5K
72
42
11
11
0
If my reports were not being believed by a person that clearly does not have the background or knowledge to refute, I would be worried. If it started looking like they were not being believed because it is politically inconvenient to do so, I would be upset as well. A leader can't make good decisions when he won't accept realities he doesn't like; and in some ways even worse, he can influence his supporters not accept them as well.
For years we have seen an effort to attack the credibility of our news organizations for political purposes. Now we see the credibility of our intelligence services being attacked for much the same reason.
This will not turn out well for us.
For years we have seen an effort to attack the credibility of our news organizations for political purposes. Now we see the credibility of our intelligence services being attacked for much the same reason.
This will not turn out well for us.
Ex-CIA boss amazed Trump doesn't believe Russia hacked US election
Posted from money.cnn.com
Office of the President (POTUS)
Donald Trump
Intelligence
Fraud
Edited 9 y ago
Posted 9 y ago
Responses: 15
7
7
0
If the proof is there, let's have it. Obama is just now launching a "review" to determine if anything happened. If the CIA is so sure why is Obama launching a "review" rather than just presenting the evidence Hayden seems to think exists???
I love the actions they recommend for Trump to take against Russia in the article. Interesting how Obama has done none of them but he is supposed to know this has happened because the CIA knows it did but Obama still sits idle. Does anyone feel like we are not getting the entire story here?
I love the actions they recommend for Trump to take against Russia in the article. Interesting how Obama has done none of them but he is supposed to know this has happened because the CIA knows it did but Obama still sits idle. Does anyone feel like we are not getting the entire story here?
(7)
(0)
Maj William W. 'Bill' Price
I don't, Cpl Jeff N.. You are correct I think; if the proof is there, let's have it. At least some of it. There are a myriad of ways to document a solid case without fully revealing your techniques and capabilities. Right now all we are being given is a narrative. And a one-sided one at that. Not a good way to make a decision.
(2)
(0)
SGT Damaso V Santana
Maj William W. 'Bill' Price - This is all part of the Progressive Vitriolic narrative, as you well explain, let's have it then, let's ask the liar in chief why is it that he has done absolutely nothing about it. Are they trying to create a manufactured crisis, are they looking to impose a state of emergency? Are they looking to create civil strife? It goes with the rest of their agenda to divide, they have already created a racial issue, destroyed from within as much as they have been able to, this last move should not surprise anyone who has followed the last 7+ years.
(0)
(0)
4
4
0
In other useless data about the election, Trump won 3084 counties to Clinton's 57, BUT that is why Trump won the electoral college..
(4)
(0)
SSG (Join to see)
There is a lot of misinformation out there from less than reputable sites, this being one this cycle. Clinton actually won 487 counties, significantly more than what you are stating. A quick search will pull up the info.
(1)
(0)
3
3
0
This is a non-story as far as I am concerned. First of all actually proving the Russians hacked the DNC emails is nearly impossible. The evidence they have now are indicators that the Russians "might" have done it. Or at least Russian criminals "might" have done it. Second, the United States hack (spy) on all sorts of other countries all the time and have been caught (Germany and Israel). I would wager that we are not trying too hard to find the actual culprit as doing so we may expose our own hacking as well.
Most importantly, there is no evidence that the Russians (or whomever hacked the emails) produced false emails. No one is denying the veracity of the emails themselves. All they did was expose the failings of the DNC and Hillary Clinton.
This story is more about the anti-Trump folks trying to hammer away at the President elect.
Most importantly, there is no evidence that the Russians (or whomever hacked the emails) produced false emails. No one is denying the veracity of the emails themselves. All they did was expose the failings of the DNC and Hillary Clinton.
This story is more about the anti-Trump folks trying to hammer away at the President elect.
(3)
(0)
SPC Kevin Ford
The evidence seems to be that the IPs are tied back to Russian groups associated with hacking for the government. That's about as good as evidence for this type of thing usually gets.
The interesting part isn't that it is what the intelligence community thinks happened, the interesting part is Trump dismissing it out of hand because it doesn't agree with his narrative.
The interesting part isn't that it is what the intelligence community thinks happened, the interesting part is Trump dismissing it out of hand because it doesn't agree with his narrative.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google