Simple Justice’s Rebuttal, My Response

Capt Gregory Prickett - I would agree with part of what you are saying. I do think this should stay at the state level. I really don't want the feds getting involved in this. There are many different ways that states handle officer involved issues some states have a state agency that handles that other use internal police. I think that is should depend on the state and the department.

SSG (Join to see) - The only time the Feds should be involved is if the US Attorney intends to prosecute a criminal case against the officer(s) under 18 USC 241 or 242. Other than that, it is a local matter.

Florida Title X Chapter 112 Section 532 Outlines LEO and Corrections Officers Bill of Rights when under investigation. LEO are not guilty until proven innocent. LEO are not normal citizens. They carry a heavy burden of power. And, their personal lives must be protected during investigations. Certain information made public can put the officer, his/her family, and friends at risk. Their future professional conduct and career be greatly influence through improper questioning and reprisals.

LTJG Richard Bruce - I'm very aware of what police officers need as far as protection, I wore a badge and a gun for over twenty years, I was heavily involved in our union/association, I testified numerous times at the Texas Legislature on police bills. I support good police officers, which are well over 99% of them.

Having said that, in many states, including Florida, the way that police misconduct investigations are handled needs to be changed. The officer should have the same rights in a criminal investigation as the normal citizen, and no more. The idea that officers are entitled to see the complaint, all other witness statements, including the statements of other involved officers before he is interviewed is stupid, as it the requirement that only one person can ask questions of the officer.

Unless you're willing to allow normal suspects to have the same rights, those need to be repealed.