Avatar feed
Responses: 3
SGT David A. 'Cowboy' Groth
1
1
0
Whatever it is, it's uglier than a wildebeest.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel
1
1
0
Nastier Looking than the Japanese Double Ugly Fish we used to Catch in Adak and Uglier than the Dog Fish My Son would Catch in Bremerton.
(1)
Comment
(0)
SSG(P) Photographer/Owner
SSG(P) (Join to see)
>1 y
This looks like the whale version of a goblin shark almost.
(1)
Reply
(0)
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel
>1 y
SSG(P) (Join to see) - That was along the Way of what I was Thinking.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
LTC Stephen F.
0
0
0
Edited >1 y ago
0aba366c
Thanks for sharing SSG(P) (Join to see)
I think the British ichthyologist Ben Frable who tagged it as Aplatophis chauliodus AKA fangtooth snake eel is probably correct.
here is an image
(0)
Comment
(0)
SSG(P) Photographer/Owner
SSG(P) (Join to see)
>1 y
To small
(0)
Reply
(0)
LTC Stephen F.
LTC Stephen F.
>1 y
SSG(P) (Join to see) - I am trying to indicate the correct size of this sea creature which dwells at the bottom. If you do a search you will see other data and images.
1. Bottom dwellers tend to live under a lot of pressure.
2. If those creatures come to the surface expect they would expand in width not in length.
3. I read through the more creditable material on this creature and British ichthyologist Ben Frable has the most reasonable answer. Granted the observed creatures are no longer that 0.83 meters.
4. I expect the correct answer will be in the snake eel family.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close