Tax reform is on track and Democrats want to derail it. Don't believe these myths about the...

About half of what it was under Obummer. Now ... explain what that has to do with taxpayer vs nontaxpayer ratio

When you mention fake in a fox article and not referring to Fox, then you are a fake yourself.

Sgt Wayne Wood - You are lying about the unemployed numbers under Obama, why lie when you can so easily be proven to be lying?

Sgt Wayne Wood - Half what is was under Obama? You mean when the numbers were "fake", and then magically became "real" once Trump was inaugurated? The level of cognitive dissonance is amazing.
What does it have to do with it? Well generally, when speaking about income tax, people's income is generated through employment, or "working" as some call it. So with more people working, earning an income, and paying taxes on said income, there are more "pulling the wagon" as you call it. Not sure if I can make it any more simple than that, but if you need me to, I can give it a try. I know you do your best.
Though, to be fair, there are plenty of working poor in the country, not because they don't have jobs, but because the jobs they do have don't pay well, or employers keep their hours low to avoid extending benefits... you know, so the CEOs can have two houses and a nice boat or two.

Liberals assume that Fox News is a conservative version of Russian television. Liberals, be specific on something you don't agree with. Don't make assumptions just because it's from Fox News that it's hundred percent wrong. We all remember or you guys choose to forget where Peter Arnett and Dan Rather both put their foot in their mouths on two different stories that they didn't check out and they both were fired! If anything, Peter Arnett was wearing the tin hat saying that special operations did rapes and chemical warfare in Laos at 1970 or Dan Rather blew it because he didn't realize that the fake report about first lieutenant President Bush had not invented a font like that for the memorandum forgery That was supposed to look like that era. Liberals, it's okay to have some kind of untrustworthiness of the news, but you need to be specific and refuted point-by-point. Right now, we have climate change scientists that kicked out the top leading climate change scientists because she disagreed with their findings and she can prove it!
Just because it's Fox News, Pravda, RT, or the New York Post doesn't mean that every single story has to have a tin hat. Maybe just those particular stories from Peter Arnett and Dan Rather. To that, you can add most of the Kyoto Accord people that just want to tax the hell out of you like I do in Canada for climate change when the Earth has been warming anyway.https://youtu.be/GujLcfdovE8

"We all remember or you guys choose to forget where Peter Arnett and Dan Rather both put their foot in their mouths on two different stories that they didn't check out and they both were fired!" - and that is the difference. When people at Fox report incorrect information, they are retained and likely rewarded, depending on how well they did it.
Point by point? Here are some good ones...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kMZgC-aidZA

True, because the idiots will still be voting for the REpublican becasue they hate Obama that much. That black guy who destroyed the U.S.

Really put some thought into that one.

Not so much President Obama, it's just he's the Pied Piper or he's been fooled by other pied pipers of blaming climate change on man alone since 1800. I found out last week that volcano eruptions actually mitigate climate change so why should I have to pay $0.25 a gallon more for gasoline California governor Jerry Brown or prime minister Trudeau when we have volcanoes are offsetting the CO2?