Avatar feed
Responses: 9
Lt Col John (Jack) Christensen
10
10
0
Well known incident but I'm still on Patton's side on this one. Makes no sense in today's military but makes complete sense curing WWII.
(10)
Comment
(0)
SGT Retired
SGT (Join to see)
>1 y
SFC David Reid, M.S, PHR, SHRM-CP, DTM - Patton was playing games. Ike most definitely wasn’t.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Lt Col John (Jack) Christensen
(0)
Reply
(0)
Lt Col John (Jack) Christensen
Lt Col John (Jack) Christensen
>1 y
SGT (Join to see) If you think so, check your history on this cowardly soldier and remember we were at war.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SGT Retired
SGT (Join to see)
>1 y
Lt Col John (Jack) Christensen - first, a few points. The loudest in the room is usually the weakest. Leading from fear is usually self-defeating. Having been to war, I’m confident in stating that pulling a sidearm on a soldier should usually be a last resort, life saving type of action. Regarding the infamous slapping incidents, particularly the one described above that took place in a hospital and brandishing a weapon, I don’t believe it meets my personal standards for pulling a weapon on a soldier. It would appear as though you disagree, so perhaps you could clarify your standards.

I think my history is ok. Please correct me where you think I’m off base. The soldier above was a kid named Paul Bennett. He had served through North Africa and Sicily during his then 4 year Army career. After some long stretches of combat (during which, his wife had a newborn son who he had never seen), he watched one of his better friends get wounded pretty badly. He was noticeably shaken. Hey, it happens.

Against his wishes, the medic sent him off the line for the night. After a short time in the rear, Bennett was ordered (again against his wishes) by medical staff to the 93rd Evacuation Hospital. According to the medical staff, Bennett begged not to go, because he didn’t want to leave his unit. He actually only arrived to the Hospital a short period of time before Patton did.

Patton was having a bad week. He had already slapped Kuhl a few days earlier. (Who had malaria and a 102*+ fever). He saw Bennett, and the conversation is well known. Slapped him. Threatened to shoot him. Actually pulled his pistol out. The doctor had to physically separate them and then hide Bennett after Patton demanded him to be sent away. The doctor then admitted him after Patton left. Rightfully so. Bennett had only been there about a half hour, and hadn’t even been fully evaluated by hospital staff. The doctors then put in motion the necessary paperwork and phone calls, as they found Patton’s behavior dangerous and unacceptable.

Patton’s reprimands are history. But what about the ‘cowardly soldier’, Private Paul Bennett? Long story short, after some down time, he recovered. Went back to service. Fought in Korea. Ended his career honorably several years later as a Sergeant First Class. Perhaps you find any or all of that cowardly. Or perhaps you disagree with my abridged version of events. Either way, please clarify, as I’m genuinely interested in your ideas on the events and the notions of leadership and cowardice.

***

For a few fun facts, it’s interesting to see how some soldiers of his day viewed Patton. Private Kuhl (the first of the infamous slapping incidents) later noted that, “...at the time it happened, he (Patton) was pretty well worn out ... I think he was suffering a little battle fatigue himself." Only once did a higher ranking soldier ever put their hands on me, albeit in a much different, less dramatic, less public scenario. I can assure you that I wasn’t (and still am not) as understanding of that Soldier as Kuhl was of Patton’s actions.

Omar Bradley, who could be considered an authority in leadership and war, wrote regarding Patton, “Canny a showman though George was, he failed to grasp the psychology of the combat soldier." That’s not high praise.

Bradley described how Patton would negatively provoke his men by showboating and extolling the pageantry of his command. "These exhibitions did not awe the troops as perhaps Patton believed. Instead, they offended them as they trudged through the clouds of dust left in the wake of his (Patton’s) procession." Also, not high praise.

When victory in Europe was finally secured, Patton repeatedly requested to be sent to the Pacific. His requests were repeatedly denied. Not because he wasn’t a capable battlefield commander, but because he was no longer worth the headache.

I never subscribed to the mythologized version of Patton’s history. Doing so generally requires disregarding the actual history.

Best of luck
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
LTC Stephen C.
7
7
0
Edited >1 y ago
SGT (Join to see), here’s George C. Scott in the titular role of the 1970 movie, Patton, delivering the first (most likely) or second apology!
Lt Col John (Jack) Christensen SFC David Reid, M.S, PHR, SHRM-CP, DTM

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=HR-QHIXol6s
(7)
Comment
(0)
Lt Col John (Jack) Christensen
Lt Col John (Jack) Christensen
>1 y
Do what the boss ordered, like it or not!
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SPC Margaret Higgins
7
7
0
Edited >1 y ago
I agree with General George S. Patton: visiting his wounded Soldiers. SGT (Join to see)
(7)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close