Avatar feed
Responses: 6
SGT Retired
4
4
0
Hard no.
Why would we want a 50+ yr old boat in need of massive modernizations/upgrades with decades worth of history of accidents and unreliability? Carriers traveling with a complement of tugs is something our rivals do, not us.

We have 20 aircraft carriers in service. 3 more are under construction. 3 more ordered after that. 13 more planned after that.

Have we ever come up just one carrier short of the desired power we wished to project? And if so, would this 50+ yr old problem boat really be the solution if you answered ‘yes’ to the previous question?

You’ve noted that our adversaries are adding more carriers in the near future. If we were to invest anything into this, it should be into a variety of ordnance. Carriers have proven difficult to sink, and we should refine our skills. Continue to find the most efficient way to drop a carrier.
(4)
Comment
(0)
MCPO Roger Collins
MCPO Roger Collins
>1 y
Besides, it would be more advantageous to bring an older decommissioned American carrier in service and don’t decomm any more, if we need more now. Heck, we can’t get the Ford up to operational effectiveness.
(3)
Reply
(0)
Lt Col John (Jack) Christensen
Lt Col John (Jack) Christensen
>1 y
MCPO Roger Collins Isnt new technology great!! :-))
(1)
Reply
(0)
MCPO Roger Collins
MCPO Roger Collins
>1 y
Lt Col John (Jack) Christensen Could you imagine this situation during WWII? We would be speaking German or Japanese.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Lt Col John (Jack) Christensen
Lt Col John (Jack) Christensen
>1 y
MCPO Roger Collins Foutunately Japanese technology was inferior and only for a few strokes of luck combined with technology did we avoid speaking German.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
LTC Self Employed
4
4
0
(4)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Steve McFarland
3
3
0
Melt it down for scrap-iron.
(3)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close