Responses: 7
Absolutely unconstitutional because it bars those who can't afford the insurance from exercising the right to keep and bear arms.
(7)
(0)
SFC Jim Ruether
Hey Cpl McMiller I don't see these legislators really carryabout gun rights. I think they are just throwing #$% at the wall to see if anything sticks?
(3)
(0)
Cpl Mark McMiller
SFC Jim Ruether - They're just dumb asses who have never read the Constitution and aren't intelligent enough to understand it if they did.
(2)
(0)
A right has to be insured? What should the insurance be for free speech???
(7)
(0)
SPC John Smith
The premium should be high enough that, as a risk pool, physical damage to persons or property, which is caused by the named peril, can be fully indemnified. $0.00 should cover it.
(2)
(0)
1SG Dennis Hicks
Only rights that make others feel all triggered and pouty. They would tax air if they could.
(2)
(0)
Read This Next

Firearms and Guns
Firearms Sales
Gun Control
