61% Think Trump Should Concede to Biden

This is no longer about who won, Trump or Biden. It's about the election process with many Constitutional overtones. No local judge is going to decide that regardless of who appointed him. And I can't wait to see your response when you learn that the Chairman of the Federal Election Commission who has looked at the evidence of voter fraud has concluded that it was rampant. Of course, you'll have to wait until the news media succumbs to pressure to cover the story

I'm glad He tossed it so quick. The president now has a quicker trip to SCOTUS.

"And I can't wait to see your response when you learn that the Chairman of the Federal Election Commission who has looked at the evidence of voter fraud has concluded that it was rampant. "

1. The Federal Election Commission is tasked with enforcing federal campaign finance laws. Not election validity.

2. James Trainor is a Trump puppet.

A little evidence about the Chairman:
In the 2016 Republican primaries, Trainor initially supported Ted Cruz, but later worked for Donald Trump.[2][3] As general counsel to the 2016 Republican National Convention platform committee, Trainor led the party's efforts to stymie last-ditch Never Trump efforts from anti-Trump Republican convention delegates.

After Trump became president, Trainor joined his administration as special assistant to Secretary of Defense James Mattis

On September 14, 2017, Trump nominated Trainor to be a member of the Federal Election Commission
Read more:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_E._Trainor_III
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/11/19/fact-check-fec-commissioner-has-no-role-election-integrity/ [login to see] /

CPT Jack Durish - I'm not sure why you commented "I can't wait to see your response when you learn that the Chairman of the Federal Election Commission who has looked at the evidence of voter fraud has concluded that it was rampant." My comment was simply about how both parties would react. One of them has already happened. The Rs have already responded that Judge Brann was an Obama appointee. No mention of the fact that he was a Republican official in Pennsylvania before becoming a judge. Since you brought it up, I saw that Trainor said that. I was not surprised, this has become a pattern. Making a charge without evidence is typical political modus operandi. Precisely what I hate about politics. I believe no charge from a politician or anyone else for that matter, until it is proven. I actually believe in innocent until proven guilty. I don't traffic in rumor and innuendo. Will you be surprised when you discover that the Republican officials are no more likely to tell the truth than the Democrats? That is the difference between you and I, you trust a political party to tell you the truth. I trust neither. 31 lawsuits and 30 have failed. The one successful was that poll watchers could be closer to the people doing the ballot work in Pennsylvania. Trainor needs to start a club with Sidney Powell or they can join QAnon

CPT Jack Durish - Perhaps you should take a closer look at your Federal Election Commissioner. (it was not the commission, it was just that one Trump ally). And, the Federal Election Commission has noting, repeat, nothing, to do with the validity of an election. Their mission is election finance.

CPT Jack Durish - Also, if there is all this evidence, why have the courts continually thrown the cases out for lack of evidence?

MSG Stan Hutchison - Which courts have thrown out the cases for lack of evidence? They are passing the buck up to appellate courts where Constitutional questions are decided

CPT Jack Durish - Not sure where you are getting you misinformation.
Here is one source about a number of cases tossed. And this was 6 days ago. There has been more since then.
https://courthawk.com/trumps-court-cases-largely-sputter-out/
More sources:
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/11/20/trump-lawsuit-pennsylvania-claims-fraud-but-provides-no-evidence/ [login to see] /
https://www.wsj.com/articles/trumps-legal-path-to-challenge-election-is-closing [login to see] 5
https://www.ft.com/content/20b114b5-5419-493b-9923-a918a2527931

NO EVIDENCE = NO FRAUD = TRUMP LOST = BIDEN WON!

SFC Kelly Fuerhoff It is the people's house.