Posted on Dec 9, 2020
Trump touts Texas Supreme Court case as 'the big one,' says 'we will be intervening'
1.92K
97
54
11
11
0
Can you imagine the outrage Texans would have if some other state sued them in order to invalidate their certified votes? But, Texas thinks IT has that right with other states?
And why in the world would POTUS think intervening was a good idea?
And why in the world would POTUS think intervening was a good idea?
Trump touts Texas Supreme Court case as 'the big one,' says 'we will be intervening'
Posted from foxnews.com
Election 2020
Donald Trump
Supreme Court
Edited >1 y ago
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 13
7
7
0
He knows how to work a series, for drama and ratings. Final episodes are often thrillers.
Edit: The time has passed for any meaningful intervention on POTUS. We'll have to settle for his thumb on the scales until a last plane ride to anywhere.
Edit: The time has passed for any meaningful intervention on POTUS. We'll have to settle for his thumb on the scales until a last plane ride to anywhere.
(7)
(0)
1stSgt Nelson Kerr
SN Greg Wright - And Texas has no right to challenge how other states run their elections, the States themselves have already gone through the courts and the changes found valid. Now show in the US Constitution how how PA holds their elections is of any LEGAL concern to Texas.
(1)
(0)
SN Greg Wright
1stSgt Nelson Kerr - Another state cheating dilutes the votes of any other state. Please consider going to 2nd grade and getting an education that will allow you to understand basic, fundamental facts?
(0)
(0)
1stSgt Nelson Kerr
SN Greg Wright - It turns out you think that at least 7 SCOTUS judges need top go back to 2nd, grade and even Republicans like Sen Cornyn and others,
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/texas-gop-senator-cornyn-criticizes-legal-theory-behind-states-election-lawsuit/ar-BB1bNwwO?ocid=uxbndlbing
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/texas-gop-senator-cornyn-criticizes-legal-theory-behind-states-election-lawsuit/ar-BB1bNwwO?ocid=uxbndlbing
(2)
(0)
4
4
0
The SCOTUS will do everything possible not to rule on the merits of these mail in voting issues
(4)
(0)
SFC (Join to see)
MAJ Bryan Zeski - This one may be a little more difficult for them as the States have the right to go to them directly. It will be very interesting to see how they avoid this. No matter what they do there will be hard feeling on either side.
(0)
(0)
SSG(P) (Join to see)
One of their stated duties is to settle disputes between the states.
In a military equivalent, it would be like if a Division Commander decided to just let his/her Brigade Commanders to do whatever they wanted, regs, no regs, whatever, just because s/he was going to retire soon.
In a military equivalent, it would be like if a Division Commander decided to just let his/her Brigade Commanders to do whatever they wanted, regs, no regs, whatever, just because s/he was going to retire soon.
(1)
(0)
(0)
(0)
4
4
0
MAJ Bryan Zeski This should be very interesting if it, indeed, is accepted for adjudication by the Supreme Court of the United States!
(4)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google