Avatar feed
Responses: 2
CSM Charles Hayden
4
4
0
Is that why ammo is so scarce? MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D.
(4)
Comment
(0)
MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D.
MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D.
3 y
One reason.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SGM Retired
3
3
0
C06be06d
I don't want this to get to civil war. I think that secession will resolve the issue. If Texas goes, how many states will choose to join them?

But if it does come to civil war, who the heck are the Liberals going to get to fight for them? Antifa? They'd last about 15 minutes, before they started running like rabbits.
(3)
Comment
(0)
SGM Retired
SGM (Join to see)
3 y
CW3 Dick McManus - You went to the 2nd Gulf War because [snip]

ONLY in your mind
(0)
Reply
(0)
CW3 Dick McManus
CW3 Dick McManus
3 y
SGM (Join to see) - I don't understand what you are saying or asking me. I do know a lot about the lies leading up to invading Iraq both times. Regarding the second time, I have information from a CIA contract agent who says So Damn Hussan was willing to do ANYTHING to prevent a US invasion. Send me an email and I send you the paper I wrote about this agent. And then there is this: Resolution regarding the behavior of former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper Jr.

Whereas we believe members of the Democratic Party have a duty to insure the law is faithfully executed,

Whereas on March 12, 2013, after telling under oath US Senator Ron Wyden that the National Security Agency (NSA) (did, not) does not collect data on millions of Americans, former National Intelligence Director James Clapper Jr., …answered the question about classified information in the “least untruthful” manner possible,”

Whereas Clapper replied, “No.” “Not wittingly. There are cases where they could inadvertently perhaps collect, but not wittingly,” yet without a warrant, NSA did in fact violate the US Constitution,

Whereas Clapper told Senate Intelligence Committee Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein that his statement was "clearly erroneous,"

Whereas Sen. Wyden, a senior member of the Senate Intelligence Committee said, “One of the most important responsibilities a Senator has is oversight of the intelligence community. This job cannot be done responsibly if Senators aren’t getting straight answers to direct questions,”

Whereas US Sens. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) and Dutch Ruppersberger (D-CA) did not call for the removal of and/or persecution of then Director of National Intelligence James Clapper Jr. for lying under oath to Congress and they only declined to comment,

Whereas as Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said, “This (Obama) administration views Edward]Snowden as the problem, not Gen. Clapper, and and the president’s pursuit of Snowden rather than the defense of the Bill of Rights, is perhaps part of the reason Clapper will get off scot-free”,

Whereas US Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky) wrote in an op-ed, “If the Constitution is to continue to apply, citizens must maintain their close watch on the eyes of government whose sleight of hand is making our rights no more than an illusion… there is no reason that Americans should sit idly by while their federal representatives let Clapper skate.,”

Whereas Clapper said, “We were shocked. … The trucks we had identified as “mobile production facilities for biological agents” were in fact used to pasteurize and transport milk,”

Whereas Clapper was in charge of the Directorate of CIA’s National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) which is responsible for analyzing imagery collected by satellites and hid the truth about the Iraqi threat in order not to impede the planned attack on Iraq,

Whereas Clapper wrote in his book, …“the administration members who were pushing a narrative of a rogue WMD program in Iraq and on the intelligence officers, including me, who were so eager to help that, we found what wasn’t really there!”

Therefore Be It Resolved, the members of the WA State Democratic Party are troubled that Congress and the Obama administration did not hold James Clapper accountable.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SGM Retired
SGM (Join to see)
3 y
CW3 Dick McManus - I don't understand what you are saying

It's SIMPLE. I'm saying that you don't know didly squat about why I went anywhere. I know why you THINK I was sent, but that's only true in YOUR MIND.

I know why I went. I KNOW. I don't need your fantasies of why you think I went.

You don't seem to get it. Some people RESENT it when you try to rope them into your fantasies. You'll have a lot more friends if you accept that they know why they did what they did, and quit trying to tell them something different.
(0)
Reply
(0)
CW3 Dick McManus
CW3 Dick McManus
3 y
You are probably right, I should stop asking what you mean less than I do.
You wrote, "you don't know didly squat about why I went anywhere."
Damn right and I don't give shit.

You are probably right, I could have fewer fantasies than I have.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close