Avatar feed
Responses: 3
CW3 Harvey K.
4
4
0
Edited 3 y ago
Hey! What's a little forgery when there is so much good at stake? The gungrabbers are just exercising their moral principle "by any means necessary" to accomplish their oh-so-noble goals.
Another possibility -- they may have "deemed" opposition to Constitutional carry was unanimous with all those instructors, who certainly do have a business interest in keeping a requirement for their instruction in the law.
(4)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
MSgt Richard Randall
2
2
0
I hate to be a contrarian but I do understand why many LTC instructors here in Texas are opposed to constitutional carry. There are a lot of goobers in the world who would love to strap on a 44 six shooter and act like Matt Dillon. Unfortunately, many of these folks haven’t a clue how to safely and responsibly handle a weapon. I was talking with an LTC instructor (former Marine and LE) and he was saying a lot of his students scare him to death. I’m all for the 2nd Amendment but I’m also for responsible ownership as well.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
Cpl Mark McMiller
1
1
0
I don't believe for one second that any of the signatures were forged. It only makes sense that they would all sign the letter in opposition to constitutional carry because if it passes it will adversely effect their businesses. But now that the gun-owning public is aware of the letter, I think a few of them are falsely claiming their signatures were forged because they're probably losing business over signing the letter.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close