Avatar feed
Responses: 5
CPT Jack Durish
6
6
0
"At this point, what does it matter?" [Forgive me. I love quoting Hillary]
(6)
Comment
(0)
CW3 Harvey K.
CW3 Harvey K.
3 y
My favorite Hillaryism, the “Vast right-wing conspiracy" to attack her husband's character and morality.
(4)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Senior Civil Engineer/Annuitant
3
3
0
Hopefully this will band people realize all votes matter, and they can’t make unsupported statements that fraud wouldn’t have changed the election until a full forensic audit is performed, with anyone performing any wrongdoing charged in court for their crimes regardless of if it would affect the election or not. If someone walked into the bank and stole $10 they would still be arrested and charged, not letting them walk because $10 will not break the bank.
(3)
Comment
(0)
SFC Senior Civil Engineer/Annuitant
SFC (Join to see)
3 y
MSG Stan Hutchison Stan you are lazy. A forensic audit is an audit performed to a standard that will be accepted by the courts. When you see the word forensic that’s pretty much what it means.
(0)
Reply
(0)
MSG Stan Hutchison
MSG Stan Hutchison
3 y
SFC (Join to see) - OK,,, and please tell me what elections were not accepted by the courts. Also, where in the Constitutions of the US and the various states requires or even authorizes an external audit such as is going on now in Arizona?
(1)
Reply
(0)
SFC Senior Civil Engineer/Annuitant
SFC (Join to see)
3 y
MSG Stan Hutchison - Stan! Stan!! Stan!!! Please wake up and be honest or I'm just going to stop speaking with you. There were major voting irregularities reported in 5 states. No complete audit was performed in any of the 5 states, they just said that even if there were, it wouldn’t have made any difference. Next time someone steals $100.00 from your checking account I hope the bank says… well you were able to cove all your bills this month so forget about it, no harm done. Would that be OK Stan? I don’t think so. Why should voting crimes be any different? The answer is they shouldn’t. In addition to voting irregularities there is the matter of governors not having the authority to change the voting laws they did: there were drop boxes under no supervision, no signatures required by some, I can go on and on but I won’t bore you. The SCOTUS punted and made excuses not to hear the cases so there never was any judgment. I personally believe the SCOTUS did not hear the cases because they would have to rule against the governors and then there would basically be lawlessness in 5 states.

I’m serious Stan. Stop the bull or I’m just going to stop replying to you. I have better things to do with my time other than to explain stuff to you that you already know. It's childish.
(0)
Reply
(0)
MSG Stan Hutchison
MSG Stan Hutchison
3 y
SFC (Join to see) - See, Bernard, you are posting claims, not proven facts.
and do you really believe Trump's Supreme Court "punted and made excuses?"
If you wish to stop communicating with me, that is fine. But if you want to continue, and keep making unproven claims, then expect me to challenge you on every one of them.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
MSG Stan Hutchison
2
2
0
This is over 4 moths old,, got any results?
Make any difference?

Well, it is on the Internet,,,,,,,

BTW, the so-called "investigator" was from Seven Hills Strategies which "represents driven clients on and between coasts. Our firm specializes working with social enterprise, impact investing, and nonprofit clients to develop strategies that empower them to more effectively implement their mission and achieve their strategic vision." WTF that means.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close