Avatar feed
Responses: 8
1SG Signal Support Systems Specialist
6
6
0
Parents are expected to care for their children and not put their children in danger.
(6)
Comment
(0)
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel
>1 y
1SG (Join to see) Makes Sense to Me!
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SrA John Monette
3
3
0
The judge made the right decision. The health and safety of the child must be first and foremost for a parent. If the father doesn't want to get vaccinated, fine. But don't endanger your child, whom you claim to love.
(3)
Comment
(0)
SFC Casey O'Mally
SFC Casey O'Mally
>1 y
How is that endangering the child? The father has not tested positive. It creates a far lower risk for the child than driving down the road.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Intelligence Analyst
2
2
0
Edited >1 y ago
Play stupid games...

@Charlie Brown - no it wasn't a poor decision at all. Not sure what Canada's rules are on appealing custody rulings but in the US you get 30 days...
(2)
Comment
(0)
SFC Casey O'Mally
SFC Casey O'Mally
>1 y
Depends on the state. Each state runs it's courts differently.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close