Avatar feed
Responses: 5
Lt Col Charlie Brown
8
8
0
No Congressperson should be allowed security at taxpayer expense.
(8)
Comment
(0)
Lt Col Charlie Brown
Lt Col Charlie Brown
2 y
Maj John Bell - If that's the case, she should be required to keep those donating to her campaign informed of what she's spending their money on.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Maj John Bell
Maj John Bell
2 y
Lt Col Charlie Brown - I'm not an expert on campaign finance laws, but I think they are required to.... if asked. But honestly, I think most voters don't and won't take the time to ask. A substantial number of voters don't feel the need to know anything beyond party affiliation or position on one single issue.
(1)
Reply
(0)
MAJ Byron Oyler
MAJ Byron Oyler
2 y
Maj John Bell - So her supporters will pay for her security while she takes away theirs? That is a new level of stupidity.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Maj John Bell
Maj John Bell
2 y
MAJ Byron Oyler - If nothing else, they are consistent.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
LTC David Brown
8
8
0
Police for me and none for thee….
(8)
Comment
(0)
SFC Senior Civil Engineer/Annuitant
SFC (Join to see)
2 y
Yes, that is her attitude sir.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Sgt Self Employed
6
6
0
I'm gonna take away your protection and I'm gonna use your money to pay for my protection. I'm more important.
"Suck it up" - Yep. She said that.

And people are still gonna vote for her.
(6)
Comment
(0)
SFC Senior Civil Engineer/Annuitant
SFC (Join to see)
2 y
You mean sheep are going to vote for here who can't think.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close