2
1
1
Posted 2 y ago
Responses: 6
If it is so revelatory, why do Fox News and other conservative outlets refuse to publicize or support it?
https://www.newsweek.com/dsouza-targets-fox-news-says-network-banning-mention-2000-mules-1706047
https://www.newsweek.com/dsouza-targets-fox-news-says-network-banning-mention-2000-mules-1706047
D'Souza targets Fox News, says network banning mention of '2000 Mules'
The conservative political commentator and filmmaker is now going after Fox News for its coverage of "2000 Mules."
(4)
(0)
For Lt Col Charlie Brown, you may believe the election was stolen, but you don't "know" it was. If you did, you would bring forth the evidence to prove it.
NO EVIDENCE = NO FRAUD = BIDEN WON = TRUMP LOST!
Plain and simple.
NO EVIDENCE = NO FRAUD = BIDEN WON = TRUMP LOST!
Plain and simple.
(4)
(0)
(0)
(0)
Capt Gregory Prickett
MSG Stan Hutchison - John doesn't care about evidence. The Trump campaign had over 60 chances to show fraud, and failed to do so even once.
(5)
(0)
Downvoted for: 1) linking to a site that is stealing the intellectual property of others, in its entirety; and 2) spreading false information about the 2020 election.
https://www.denverpost.com/2022/05/08/2000-mules-fact-check/
https://www.denverpost.com/2022/05/08/2000-mules-fact-check/
Fact-checking “2000 Mules,” the movie alleging ballot fraud
A film debuting in over 270 theaters across the United States this week uses a flawed analysis of cellphone location data and ballot drop box surveillance footage to cast doubt on the results of th…
(3)
(0)
Read This Next